Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Off-Topic Babbling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 10:07 AM
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Posts: 3,757
Send a message via MSN to Sticks
Default Return to Sail?

Whilst doing my media sweep for work.

(Bringing transport related stories to the attention of senior officers)

I came across this story from the Times Online

Quote:
A British schooner docked in Penzance yesterday carrying 30,000 bottles of wine on a voyage that enthusiasts believe will herald a return to wind power in merchant shipping.

The first commercial cargo of French wine to be transported by sail in the modern era is due in Dublin this week after a six-day journey, which is being touted as a green and ultimately cheap alternative to fuel propulsion.

The 108-year-old, wooden, triple-masted Kathleen & May has been chartered by the Compagnie de Transport Maritime à la Voile (CTMV), a shipping company established in France to specialise in merchant sailing. “This is beyond anybody's dreams,” said Steve Clarke, the owner of the Kathleen & May, which was built in 1900 in Ferguson and Baird's yard at Connah's Quay near Chester.

“When I bought this boat in 1966 it was going to be cut up with chainsaws. Nobody ever imagined it would ever sail again.” He said that amid high fuel costs and concern over carbon emissions, commercial sailing ships could have a future. “I think they might have hit on something.”
I vaguely remember that some clipper ships like the Cutty Sark could out run some of the early steam ships of its day.

So perhaps it is time to bring back these clipper ships as it was a proven design.
__________________
Fame, glory adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things.

Last edited by Sticks; 24-July-2008 at 10:08 AM. Reason: Problems creating thread
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 10:40 AM
sarongsong's Avatar
sarongsong sarongsong is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,559
Default

Ah, "Return to Sail?"; at first thought something to return to a store.
Nice find---clipper ships are gorgeous, and the Cutty Sark itself made headlines just last year here.
__________________
*
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 10:48 AM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,456
Default

I think if you want wind powered cargo ships, charging an onboard flow battery using electricity from wind turbines might be more practical. Using biodiesel is also another option and one which works in current ships.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 01:28 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 7,692
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
...I came across this story from the Times Online
... So perhaps it is time to bring back these clipper ships as it was a proven design.
I was almost expecting the "gotcha" that makes this just another meaningless expensive green story best suited for hype... but this one actually sounds promising (at least for non perishibles)
Quote:
“We are 5 per cent more expensive than standard merchant shipping companies at the moment. But we are going to build our own ships and when they enter service, we will be cheaper.”
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 01:59 PM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,456
Default

From the article:

Quote:
It travels at a top speed of eight knots, about half as fast as a modern cargo vessel.
That's comparing its top speed to the average speed of a bulk cargo carrier. (About 13-16 knots.) A container ship might average around 23 knots. A clipper could average around 9 knots, depending on route. The largest clipper was about 4,000 tons, most much less. A typical container ship might be 8,000-15,000.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 02:31 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 11,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
So perhaps it is time to bring back these clipper ships as it was a proven design.
Modern cargo and container ships are a proven design too.

If the modern use of clipper ships is going to be anything more than a stunt, it comes down to time and money. The company I work for ships tons of product overseas, by both airfreight and ship. The choice comes down to time/money - airfreight is faster but much more expensive. If we are pressed for a delivery date, we eat the cost, otherwise it goes by ship.

The clipper ship is even slower, so the only way we would even think of using it would be if it was a lot cheaper. I haven't looked at the economics, but I doubt it will be.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 03:06 PM
Jim's Avatar
Jim Jim is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clear Lake City, TX
Posts: 4,301
Default

A fellow here in Texas had a similar idea, but it didn't work out as planned.

They had hoped the boat would be the beginning on an environmentally friendly business importing coffee to the United States. RedCloud was bringing its first cargo home from Belize when the Butchers and Joe’s brother, Doug Butcher, 47, lost their engine and then encountered heavy weather in the Gulf.
(edit)
All indications are that the 42-foot steel sailboat and its cargo of about 4,000 pounds of Central American coffee sank in the Gulf of Mexico about 240 miles south of Galveston.

http://galvestondailynews.com/story....bd56eeb07bdcd7
__________________
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity.
Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 03:10 PM
Jim's Avatar
Jim Jim is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clear Lake City, TX
Posts: 4,301
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sarongsong View Post
Ah, "Return to Sail?"; at first thought something to return to a store.
Okay, fixed. And lay off Sticks. Being British, he has problems with the English language.
__________________
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity.
Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 03:16 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 7,692
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim View Post
Being British, he has problems with the English language.
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 03:50 PM
tofu tofu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: florida, USA
Posts: 2,390
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
I vaguely remember that some clipper ships like the Cutty Sark could out run some of the early steam ships of its day.
You might find this interesting
In 1854, the Northern Light participated in the only head-to-head race of the clipper ship era, leaving San Francisco two days behind two highly regarded clipper ships from the New York school of clipper ship design, all three headed for the East Coast of the United States. Even with the communications technology of the day, the whole nation was able to follow the race as other ships would sight the three contestants and then telegraph their sighting from the nearest port. When the Northern Light was spotted charging into Boston harbor under full sail, days ahead of the competition, it touched off a wild victory celebration that rocked through the streets of the city for four days.

The record for that voyage from San Francisco around Cape Horn to an east coast port of 76 days 8 hours stood until the 1990s when the record was broken by a high-tech catamaran using satellite navigation, modern weather reporting, and being purpose built for speed (the clipper ships were freighters and carried a full load of cargo on every trip). How many other vehicle speed records have stood for 150 years?


The article doesn't say, but I presume the record is for the fastest sail-powered ship. What's the distance from San Francisco to Boston around Cape Horn?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 04:03 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 7,692
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tofu View Post
...The article doesn't say, but I presume the record is for the fastest sail-powered ship...
That would be my presumption. But; I also thought; who would be trying to go quickly on that route once the Panama Canal was completed?
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 04:32 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 11,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim View Post

All indications are that the 42-foot steel sailboat and its cargo of about 4,000 pounds of Central American coffee sank in the Gulf of Mexico about 240 miles south of Galveston.
The Gulf gets warm enough in the summer that you just had to sink some boat loads of sugar cane and non-fat dry milk and we would have had some wake-up for all those oil platform personnel.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 06:12 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,937
Default

Several large cargo ships have experimented with moden sails, essentially, airfoils, to augment propulsion and save energy. With the cost of diesal through the roof, it makes even more sense these days.
__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol. Human.

Whoever says "perception is reality" is daft. It's merely an abstraction, and often not a very good one.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 09:33 PM
danscope's Avatar
danscope danscope is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: R.I.
Posts: 1,716
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
Whilst doing my media sweep for work.

(Bringing transport related stories to the attention of senior officers)

I came across this story from the Times Online



I vaguely remember that some clipper ships like the Cutty Sark could out run some of the early steam ships of its day.

So perhaps it is time to bring back these clipper ships as it was a proven design.
********************

Hi Sticks, I like to sail. Earlier this month, I was a guest on my
sister's power boat, a Pacemaker...maybe 55 feet long. Twin detroit 92's.
In view of the fuel, we just trolled along with a couple of lines out.
Her husband ,Stanley , winked at me and said that the sailboat people were laughing at him.
To which I replied that " No, Stanley. They aren't laughing at you.
......but......they are 'a little smug' !"

When fuel gets high enough, sail starts looking better and better.
Nice to have a kicker to manuver in port, against wind and tide, but let the wind do the lion's share of the heavy lifting.
Best regards, Dan
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 09:37 PM
Argos's Avatar
Argos Argos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 22°20'42"S / 49°03'14"W
Posts: 6,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swift View Post
If the modern use of clipper ships is going to be anything more than a stunt, it comes down to time and money.
Yeah. Don´t use them to distribute the Beaujolais Nouveau...
__________________
If you're careful enough, nothing bad or good will ever happen to you.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 09:59 PM
korjik korjik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,279
Default

I dont see sails taking the place of container ships, but if they are right, and can build and maintain the sailing ships and then actually ship cheaper, I can see them being very good in certain niches. Short range coastal work could be a good spot. I dont think they will get much traction in transoceanic shipping because they will still be a little too dependent on the wind.

On the other hand, it might be cool to take a sailing ship on a cruise.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 24-July-2008, 11:44 PM
cjl's Avatar
cjl cjl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: University of Colorado - Boulder
Posts: 2,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
That would be my presumption. But; I also thought; who would be trying to go quickly on that route once the Panama Canal was completed?
Well, quite a few of the largest cargo ships are too big for the Panama Canal.

Of course, they still wouldn't do that route. Cargo for that route would probably go by rail instead.
__________________
WANTED:

Schroedinger's Cat

Dead And Alive
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 01:04 AM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,456
Default

Let's see, if a clipper could carry around 500 tons of cargo and averages one third the speed of a container ship, then you'd only need about a hundred or so to do the job of one large modern container ship. And ports would need to be expanded to deal with the congestion and maintenance and repair.

A wooden clipper might last 20 years before being scrapped, if they didn't come apart before that. Modern steel hulls might last 25-35 years. Since so many more tons of sail ships will be needed to move the same amount of cargo as today, a lot more money and energy would have to be spent on building them.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 01:19 AM
cjl's Avatar
cjl cjl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: University of Colorado - Boulder
Posts: 2,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Brak View Post
Let's see, if a clipper could carry around 500 tons of cargo and averages one third the speed of a container ship, then you'd only need about a hundred or so to do the job of one large modern container ship. And ports would need to be expanded to deal with the congestion and maintenance and repair.

A wooden clipper might last 20 years before being scrapped, if they didn't come apart before that. Modern steel hulls might last 25-35 years. Since so many more tons of sail ships will be needed to move the same amount of cargo as today, a lot more money and energy would have to be spent on building them.
They could easily be larger than 500 tons, and use steel hulls. Just because they would use wind power wouldn't mean that you would have to abandon all other parts of modern shipbuilding.
__________________
WANTED:

Schroedinger's Cat

Dead And Alive
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)