Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Off-Topic Babbling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 04:04 PM
Doodler's Avatar
Doodler Doodler is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 9,464
Send a message via AIM to Doodler Send a message via MSN to Doodler
Default Oil prices in freefall

To BBP and company,

Just curious what your thoughts are about the last week or so in the markets.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 04:33 PM
jt-3d's Avatar
jt-3d jt-3d is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,800
Default

They have, once again pushed the prices until the consumer cryed uncle. And now they've dropped them. They always push the prices up until the consumers start cutting back and then they stop and back down a few cents and there the price stays. Seen it.

Only this is the greediest I have ever seen them. This is a complete exploitation of a monopoly. Now we're all supposed to breathe a sigh of relief because of a few glowy headlines that tell us the pricese may fall. Blah blah blah

Trade in your SUVs for little cars and watch the oil moguls start to sweat for a change.
__________________
You're a coward and a liar and a thOOF - Bart Sibrel
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 04:36 PM
samkent samkent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 382
Default

That's called supply and demand. Nothing else.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 04:36 PM
banquo's_bumble_puppy's Avatar
banquo's_bumble_puppy banquo's_bumble_puppy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alpha III
Posts: 1,968
Default

it's a blip that will soon reverse...throw in a hurricane or 2/some tension over Iran and voila.....$200.00 barrel oil
__________________
The world breaks everyone and afterward many are strong in the broken places. ~ Ernest Hemingway ...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 04:48 PM
777 geek's Avatar
777 geek 777 geek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Aberdeen, UK
Posts: 886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jt-3d View Post
They have, once again pushed the prices until the consumer cryed uncle. And now they've dropped them. They always push the prices up until the consumers start cutting back and then they stop and back down a few cents and there the price stays. Seen it.

Only this is the greediest I have ever seen them. This is a complete exploitation of a monopoly. Now we're all supposed to breathe a sigh of relief because of a few glowy headlines that tell us the pricese may fall. Blah blah blah

Trade in your SUVs for little cars and watch the oil moguls start to sweat for a change.
Well your right to say that a market reaction has occured. The high price caused a drop in demand. However, the crap about monopolists is rubbish. No one nefarious entity is setting the price. It's simply supply and demand. I know it's more comforting to blame a person or organisation, but sometimes SJH.
__________________
2 good 2 need 4 engines
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 04:59 PM
Heid the Ba' Heid the Ba' is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dłn Eideann
Posts: 266
Default

It is speculators driving the price down to suit their evil ends.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 05:07 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jt-3d View Post
Trade in your SUVs for little cars and watch the oil moguls start to sweat for a change.
Little cars that run on batteries which are recharged off the nuclear-power-fed grid.
__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol. Human.

Whoever says "perception is reality" is daft. It's merely an abstraction, and often not a very good one.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 05:37 PM
Jason Jason is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Centerville, UT
Posts: 1,213
Default

How about dropping the Congressional ban on off-shore drilling and ANWR? Knowing that several billion barrels of domestic oil will be available in 5 or 6 years will drop the price.
__________________
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 05:55 PM
SeanF's Avatar
SeanF SeanF is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 5,381
Default

It's too early for this, isn't it? I thought "they" were supposed to drop the price of gas closer to November...
__________________
SeanF

"Ask to understand, but don't challenge unless you have the knowledge."--NEOWatcher

The contents of this post are ©2008 by SeanF and may not be copied or retransmitted in any form without the express written consent of SeanF
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 06:32 PM
jfribrg jfribrg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: 40N 75W mag 4.1 sky at best
Posts: 1,243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heid the Ba' View Post
It is speculators driving the price down to suit their evil ends.
I agree that the speculators are driving much of the cost, but that is not the entire story. The demand from China and India has placed a permanent upward pressure on the cost of oil. Also, every time things start stabilizing, Iran intentionally reminds the world about its nuclear ambitions in order to raise the uncertainty about disruptions to the middle east oil supply.

I've always been fascinated by oil economics. For most commodities, raising the cost of the raw material hurts the profits of the companies that buy the raw material. Not so with oil companies. Depending on circumstances, sometimes oil has an inelastic demand and other times it has an elastic demand. Right now, it is inelastic. Back in the late 70's it was inelastic. Sometime around 1983 or 1984, it became elastic and stayed that way until about 2000 or 2001.

Becoming entirely energy self sufficient is not going to be the wonderful utopia that everyone expects. It costs a lot less to produce oil domestically than to buy it on the foreign market. If we had enough oil to meet our needs, the domestic oil would be sold to the highest bidder, which would be overseas. Many problems, such as the trade deficit, would be solved, but we would still be left with the same high oil prices that we are currently dealing with.

If we make large investments in alternative energy, such as wind and solar, we get a different problem. Much of the energy will be generated in the western portion of the US, while much of it will be consumed in the East. Meanwhile, the West has always been desperate for large quantites of fresh water. The folks out West will want to trade water for energy, while the folks in the East ,who are usually not awash in fresh water (except for every 15 years when the Mississippi has a 100 year flood) will simply want the energy without giving up the water. With geographical animosities like that, it won't be long before a cecessionist movement starts. Terrible idea, but then again, so was the confederacy.

Bottom line is that everything involves tradeoffs. Anyone who claims to have a simple solution certainly doesn't understand the issues.
__________________
True is the question
Derived from the Shakespeare Postulate (2b)|| !(2b)

Last edited by jfribrg; 25-July-2008 at 07:32 PM. Reason: type
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 06:39 PM
Argos's Avatar
Argos Argos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 22°20'42"S / 49°03'14"W
Posts: 6,766
Default

Time to go shopping [and get the reward by christmas].
__________________
If you're careful enough, nothing bad or good will ever happen to you.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 07:40 PM
redshifter's Avatar
redshifter redshifter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wa state - Seattle area
Posts: 728
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason View Post
How about dropping the Congressional ban on off-shore drilling and ANWR? Knowing that several billion barrels of domestic oil will be available in 5 or 6 years will drop the price.
How about working towards getting off fossil fuels altogether, or enough such that our own supplies will be sufficient? Seems like just drilling for more only perpetuates the status quo. I realize it will be more that 5 - 6 years before new infrastructure can be developed, but we should start now (we should've started 20 years ago...) I've also read that it will be 7 - 10 years before we see any increased supply and even that increased supply won't do much for prices. Not sure who I'm supposed to believe these days regarding why oil has gone up and what we can do about it.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 08:04 PM
Jason Jason is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Centerville, UT
Posts: 1,213
Default

How about we do both? Drill for the current need and work towards new tech. Fill the immediate need and look towards the futrue.

You might want to keep in mind that oil is used for more than just energy. Even if we all converted to fuel cells tomorrow we would still need oil for plastics, for instance.

Also, if speculation is a major cause of the current prices, as many theorize, then a promise of future supply, even if it will take 7-10 years to actually arrive, will drop prices now.
__________________
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 08:12 PM
cplradar cplradar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 29
Default

Canada is the main supplier of oil to the United States, at least that's what the EIA says. I find it odd that the U.S. does not have the leverage to force Canadian companies to lower prices. I would assume allowing them to have sports franchises in the American National Hockey League, the American National Basketball Association, as well as in American baseball (which is not a sport, but the media considers it one), would be enough to coax them into things.

Or do I not understand U.S.-Canadian relations?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 08:16 PM
tdvance's Avatar
tdvance tdvance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bowie, MD
Posts: 2,182
Default

Why not both? drill now (the sure thing) and work on ideas for reducing the need for oil.
__________________
-----
Todd (Bowie, MD, US, North America, Earth, Sol System, Vega region, Local Bubble, Orion arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo A Cluster, Virgo supercluster, the universe in which spock is clean shaven)

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

personal page: http://blog.astrosketches.info
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 08:40 PM
redshifter's Avatar
redshifter redshifter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wa state - Seattle area
Posts: 728
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdvance View Post
Why not both? drill now (the sure thing) and work on ideas for reducing the need for oil.

I personally think that is probably the best solution. Oil's gonna be around in some way or another for the forseeable future. As one poster said, oil's used for other things besides energy.

The problem I have is that there seems to be a lot of people out there that think we can just drill our way out of our energy problems, but that simply perpetuates the issues with burning fossil fuels, not to mention the worldwide socio-economic problems. I'd like to see increased drilling sold to the american people not as a panacea, but as a short term stopgap until more sustainable solutions can be developed.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 08:42 PM
Torsten Torsten is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 951
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cplradar View Post
Or do I not understand U.S.-Canadian relations?
Clearly not.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 08:49 PM
Jason Jason is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Centerville, UT
Posts: 1,213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cplradar View Post
Canada is the main supplier of oil to the United States, at least that's what the EIA says. I find it odd that the U.S. does not have the leverage to force Canadian companies to lower prices.
Time to invade Canada, I guess.

Quote:
American baseball (which is not a sport, but the media considers it one)
I think the Japanese would disagree with you.
__________________
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 08:53 PM
cplradar cplradar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 29
Default

Actually, I misread the EIA website. The U.S. is the largest supplier of oil to the U.S., and Canada is the largest foreign supplier of oil. Also the largest foreign consumer of refined oil products is Canada. I would assume it would behove them to lower their prices to the U.S. so that the U.S. could then lower their prices to them.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 08:59 PM
Parrothead's Avatar
Parrothead Parrothead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 1,792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cplradar View Post
Canada is the main supplier of oil to the United States, at least that's what the EIA says. I find it odd that the U.S. does not have the leverage to force Canadian companies to lower prices. I would assume allowing them to have sports franchises in the American National Hockey League, the American National Basketball Association, as well as in American baseball (which is not a sport, but the media considers it one), would be enough to coax them into things.

Or do I not understand U.S.-Canadian relations?

IIRC, NAFTA already has some regulation where oil supplied to the US from Canada is at wholesale prices, not market.
__________________
" The universe is running away
I heard it on the news just the other day
There's this new stuff called dark energy
We can't measure and we can't see..." - from Jimmy Buffett's What if the hokey pokey is all it really is about?
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 25-July-2008, 09:05 PM
cplradar cplradar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 29
Default