If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Off-Topic Babbling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: What are the chances of a 9/11 style attack; say within the next 2 years and what effect do you thin
Not very likely. No effect 2 22.22%
Somewhat likely- greater than 50% and will cause economic damage similar to 9/11/01 3 33.33%
Very likely- greater than 75% and will cause worse economic damage than 9/11/01 2 22.22%
Imminent- and catastrophic 2 22.22%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2003, 04:48 PM
banquo's_bumble_puppy's Avatar
banquo's_bumble_puppy banquo's_bumble_puppy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alpha III
Posts: 1,897
Default What are the chances of a 9/11 style attack?

How likely is a 9/11 style attack; say within the next 2 years and what effect do you think it will have on the US economy?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2003, 05:10 PM
Stuart Stuart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 692
Default

The options for questions here are a bit skewed since they don't reflect varying combinations of probability and effect. Really there ought to be two polls here - one is how likely is another terrorist attack, the second would be how damaging to the economy.

I believe the probability of another major terrorist attack within the next two years is so high that it reaches certainty. It's quite possible (again reaching certainty) that there have been such attacks attempted and the parties making the attempt are now no longer with us.

Its possible that a relatively minor attack could have a major financial impact; also that an apparently massive and damaging assault could have much less. Just too many variables to judge.

But, there will be another attack; my guess is probably biological. Get your smallpox shots up to date.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2003, 05:20 PM
banquo's_bumble_puppy's Avatar
banquo's_bumble_puppy banquo's_bumble_puppy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alpha III
Posts: 1,897
Default

I agree that another attack is a virtual certainty. The psychogical affect alone will be devasting, (IMHO).
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2003, 05:24 PM
Ripper Ripper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 430
Default

I think it is a given that there are many terrorist orginizations currently engaged in plots against the US and other western nations. The best we can hope to do is make it difficult for them, and mitigate any damage they do. We have come a long way, and learned a few hard lessons, but we still have a long way to go.
__________________
That which cannot be remedied must be endured.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2003, 06:13 PM
tuffel999 tuffel999 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 843
Default

Yeah I would have to say damn near a sure thing but I don't know how much damage it would cost. Heck the peron or persons who do it could even be citizens, Tim M. anyone. All you can do is live your life and not let it ruin your life.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2003, 07:38 PM
SollyLama SollyLama is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 185
Default

It really depends on several factors. One being who wins in 2004. No one would like to see another democrat in office more than bin laden. It worked out so well for him last time.
Essentially none of the dem hopefuls have anything to offer national security except Lieberman and Clark. Clark has no qualification for president and having seen him flip flop on issues so often makes me doubt his commitment to any one agenda. Lieberman is a jew. Not only a jew but very vocal about it. Can you see the ramifications for the middle east if America is run by a jew? How can we even pretend to be honest brokers of peace when our own leadership would be one of 'the enemy' to the palestinians? The election of Lieberman would all but guarantee an all out jihad against us. We do such a poor job of hiding our preference for Israel now that our 'road map' is barely more than terms of surrender for the palestinians. Putting Joe in charge would deal a death blow to any hope of a US brokered peace. There is just no getting around his religion when it comes to islamic fundamentalism.
Bush needs to knock off his clinging to superstition because quite frankly it comes across as another Crusade anytime we have to get tough with arabs.
Then comes the issue of passing real laws that take serious action to protect the US. But you see how much love people have for the Patriot Act. So again, even given the tools to fight terror, it's politically incorrect, and that's what most Americans care about. They want to stop terror, but not offend anyone in the process. Idiocy. Exactly the same thinking that made the INS completely useless and sponsors stupid ideas like prop 187 in CA.
I mean look, we have a serious problem when people can come here, stay without bothering with the law and even use our own institutions (like flight school) against us. Yet there are still dopes like Davis that want to give illegals a free pass. Now Mass wants to do the same asinine thing.
We're fighting ourselves as much as the bad guys.
So I say the chances of successful attack go strait back to who is in office and where. If the dems gain any power at all, you might as well paint a big target on some buildings. History has already proven that a dem in office is a breeding ground for terror against us.
Being safe means we can't always be nice anymore. We can't live in an idealogical Never Never Land anymore. If you try it, reality will come slamming into our buildings at 450 mph and set us strait.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2003, 07:50 PM
dgruss23's Avatar
dgruss23 dgruss23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 4,128
Default

Quote:
sollylama wrote: Being safe means we can't always be nice anymore. We can't live in an idealogical Never Never Land anymore. If you try it, reality will come slamming into our buildings at 450 mph and set us strait.
That's exactly the case. We need to look no further than the recent bombing of the UN headquarters in Iraq to see the effects of linguini spined fantasy land thinking. Gee, they thought they'd be safer if they disassociated themselves from the United States Military.

"Yes, we're the UN. We're nice. They won't hurt us because we're here to help. Its the "evil" Americans they're after. We'll be safe as long as we stay away from the Americans." :roll:
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today