'The Celebrities and Science Review 2008, prepared by the group Sense About Science, identifies some of the worst examples of scientific illiteracy among those who profess to know better – including top politicians.' The Independent

__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire.
"All your bias are belong to us" Ara Pacis.

I don't think it is fair to evaluated scientific knowledge with answers on controversial subjects.

This is propaganda disguised as a cross examination of people opinions.This "Sense about Science" group is a lobbying group.

Galacsi, these are the topics mentioned in the article.

* The claim that vaccines cause autism.
* Research using fruit flies (a good candidate for genetic research, shares 50% of their genes with humans, rapid generations)
* "Natural" good, "unnatural" bad.
* "Mind meals"
* Eliminate all sugar from diet
* Detoxification using diet and/or "highly trained medical leeches".
* And the supposed (but unsupported) "benefits" of vitamin supplements.

I find myself curious as to which one of those topics you consider to be (scientifically) controversial.

__________________
And you, to whom adversity has dealt the final blow
With smiling [faces] lyin' to ye' everywhere ye' go
Turn to, and put out all your strength of arm and heart and brain
And like the Mary Ellen Carter, rise again.

There is no scientific controversy on vaccine just ones made up by quacks. The increase in autism is because they changed the defination of autism to include several other disorders.
the only comment I have to make about politicians and celebraties knowing nothing about science is, no really.
yes there are esceptions but very few it seems nowadays.

__________________
If it's just us, it seems like an awful waste of space.
Contact Carl Sagan

http://davidsuniverse.wordpress.com/

The last five , I have no opinion about autism. The Palin remark on fruit flies is clearly from ignorance.

Added remark : You did not speak of PSYCHIATRY. A problem with it ?

BBC News presenters take great delight in appearing to know or care nothing about science.

Radio 4 has the 'Today' show from 7.30 to 9 am every day, it's supposed to be the 'Flagship' news prog. Brian Humphreys the main presenter seems proud he knows nothing about any of the science or technology news or features.

IN the the UK the Middle Classes would be ashamed to display any ignorance of the Booker Prize shortlist or Turner Prize entries. Ask them about the LHC and they will be proud of the fact they know nothing about it.

There are even some who think Oxbridge should get rid of science and concentrate on the 'Classics', that's what is important. Who needs Calculus when you should be studying Latin, Greek or Ancient Literature.

__________________
All Moderation in Purple
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
◄Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice ►

I don't have that impression. They hosted a series of programmes on the Nobel winners, for instance.

__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire.
"All your bias are belong to us" Ara Pacis.

yeah, it's just awfu, they don't know any more than the rest of us when it comes to the complete span of human knowledge. Let us all castigate them for that!!

YOu are conflating the BBC with the Radio 4 News Presenters. ALso a series of Biographies of famous people is right up their street as long as they don't have to understand all that difficult science stuff. Radio 4 as a whole is very pro science. 'In Our Time is a first class prog, it covers history, science, philosophy etc. When it's trailed in the preceding 'Today Program' the science episodes are always met with bafflement and jokes.

__________________
All Moderation in Purple
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
◄Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice ►

You wrote 'BBC News presenters'. I watched this on BBC News. Perhaps you meant 'BBC news presenters'...

__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire.
"All your bias are belong to us" Ara Pacis.

How do you train a leech to begin with, much less 'highly train' one for medical practices?

David.

Well, now there's an open-minded comment. If someone said that about one of the beloved scientific heros of this forum they would be banned immediately. But as long as one slurs the unwashed it's ok. No banning offense here, its just some common ignorant donkey that's under discussion!!

What on Earth are you talking about...

Agreed. THY, what are you talking about?

"Highly trained medical leeches" is a silly description of a concept (previously known as "restoring one's humours") that routinely killed people in the 1700s. And it would remain a silly and dangerous proposition had a Nobel laureate uttered it.

Either way, it's not wrong to call people on dangerously wrong statements. The ignorance of these people are demonstrably getting people killed.

__________________
And you, to whom adversity has dealt the final blow
With smiling [faces] lyin' to ye' everywhere ye' go
Turn to, and put out all your strength of arm and heart and brain
And like the Mary Ellen Carter, rise again.

Well, I don't know where the "highly trained" comes from, but (apparently back in 2004) the U.S. Food and Drug Administration gave clearance to a French firm to market the bloodsucking aquatic animals as medical devices.

FDA reports that leeches can help heal skin grafts by removing blood pooled under the graft and restore blood circulation in blocked veins by removing pooled blood.

__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.

Right. "Highly trained" would be the medical professional who knows the circumstances in which leeches can be used. For example, the son of a friend of mine had a finger sawn off in an industrial accident two years ago. It was successfully reattached. The post-surgery treatment included the regular application of leeches to remove pooling, clotting blood as the various tissues and blood vessels regrew.

Missed it, apparently.

__________________
And you, to whom adversity has dealt the final blow
With smiling [faces] lyin' to ye' everywhere ye' go
Turn to, and put out all your strength of arm and heart and brain
And like the Mary Ellen Carter, rise again.

Yes. Leeches do have valid medical uses. "Detoxification" is not even remotely one of them.

__________________
And you, to whom adversity has dealt the final blow
With smiling [faces] lyin' to ye' everywhere ye' go
Turn to, and put out all your strength of arm and heart and brain
And like the Mary Ellen Carter, rise again.

Funny, I was re-reading my reply and thought to add that using leeches as described by that particular celeb to "detoxify" and "make you bleed" was simply ignorant.

Of course I don't like it--but to be fair, we don't expect scientists to be actors but of course I understand the point--scientists rarely pretend to be actors.

__________________
-----
Todd (Bowie, MD, US, North America, Earth, Sol System, Vega region, Local Bubble, Orion arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo A Cluster, Virgo supercluster, the universe in which spock is clean shaven)

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

personal page: http://blog.astrosketches.info

For God's sake people, at least read the article before getting your knickers in a twist.

Quote from the article:
Kate Moss, Oprah Winfrey and Demi Moore all espoused the idea that you can detoxify your body with either diet (scientifically unsupportable) or, in the case of Moore, products such as "highly trained medical leeches" which make you bleed.

Now TheHalcyonYear, tell me what is so offensive to 'one of the beloved scientific heros of this forum' in my question?

I ask again, just what the hell is a "highly trained medical leeche", and how do they train them.

David.

As you say. Scientific illiteracy is a problem, but I respect those who _try_ to learn nonetheless.

Cruise, McCarthy, Stein, Winfrey (among many) actively misuse their influence to spread dangerous and sometimes deadly misinformation. The greater their influence, the greater their responsibility to _understand_ what it is they advocate.

__________________
And you, to whom adversity has dealt the final blow
With smiling [faces] lyin' to ye' everywhere ye' go
Turn to, and put out all your strength of arm and heart and brain
And like the Mary Ellen Carter, rise again.

I wouldn't lump Obama with the rest. He seems-refreshingly-pretty nerdy.

__________________
I want to go back to the moon.
I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear.
"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek

Since we're talking about applying them to Kate Moss, I guess the first thing to do is to get the leeches addicted to illegal substances so they are more attracted to her blood vessels.

__________________
‘To those who regard “crime fiction” as some sacred icon which must follow a rigid formula, I will always be the man who writes 18-syllable haiku.’Trying to make sense of computers, The Error Log.

Leeches are coming back , you can read it in the internet.

http://www.blutegel.org/sangsue/sangsue.htm (For example)

Exactly they are not trained of course but raised and conditioned.

This is just a small funny error IMO. And detoxify is only a wrong choice of word. that's all.

You're right about double-standards at this board, but in this case, the reference is to actual leeches. I don't think they will be offended if we call them what they are.

Har Har Henrik! nice one!

By the way, Captain Swoop. Today programme on Radio 4 starts at 0600 hours, not 0730.
You've been missing out on an hour and half's fun!

And I think John Humphreys and Co are fabulous. And they do not deride Science, Sir.

__________________
clear skies

If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. CARL SAGAN

Mak: Pass the pepperoni please.
Fazor: "Hail, Bautainia! We pledge our hearts to thee! Science and woo, some babbling too, and astron-oh-meee!"
slang: And it made ash out of yew and tree.

Any relation to the Today presenter John Humphreys

__________________
Moderations in purple

Fame, glory, adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things.

To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
◄ Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄ Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice ►

I'm 39 years old and remember as a small child hearing that "leeches are coming back". It's kind of like cold fusion....

__________________
-----
Todd (Bowie, MD, US, North America, Earth, Sol System, Vega region, Local Bubble, Orion arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo A Cluster, Virgo supercluster, the universe in which spock is clean shaven)

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

personal page: http://blog.astrosketches.info

For specific post-surgial procedures where they help to keep at least minimal blood-flow going to make healing possible, they are coming forward rather than back, as that's a new use of old technology.

For the wooistic purifying the humours thing they are unfortunately coming back, but even if they are espoused by the Church of Oprah that don't make them work any better.

__________________
‘To those who regard “crime fiction” as some sacred icon which must follow a rigid formula, I will always be the man who writes 18-syllable haiku.’Trying to make sense of computers, The Error Log.