First: this quote about the HUP should give you some insight into my thoughts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delvo
Durakken, your problem seems to be with the way that the uncertainty principle is usually expressed. It's normally described as a limit on what we can know about the particles, but what they really mean by it is that it's a limit on the particles themselves. It's not that the questions we might ask about the particles have real answers and we just can't know what those answers are; it's that the answers really don't exist. The particles don't exist in a hidden or secretive state; they exist in a physically truly undetermined state themselves. If we were to anthropomorphize them, the correct analogy would be not that they're keeping secrets from us, but that they haven't made up their own minds and thus don't know what they're up to themselves. The undeterminedness is a physical phenomenon inherent to the particles, not just a logic puzzle inherent to our experimental methods.
|
The uncertainty principle shows that particles first 'exist' in an undetermined state. As they enter their definite state, they do so in a semi-random manner. A manner which is determined by probabilities and the physics that are acting on them. And so... we get a vast universe of variety and oddness.
My question is this:
Could life be the random occurrence of a control mechanism for these particles? Similar to the way a transistor is able to control the state of a current (try not to cloud your brain with the specifics of that crude analogy) This control mechanism wouldn't have infinite power, b/c it would still be severely limited by probability... but... perhaps it could have the ability to make simple decisions ... and therefore the ability to evolve into complex organisms over the course of millions of years.