When I look at Mars & Venus, both dry planets, I wonder if there is a ratio of the area covered by water on the surface and the area represented by dry land that determines the future status of the planet. When the newly formed planets cool (and I am going to leave alone for the time being where the water comes from) doesn't it follow rationally that a planet that is cooling & out-gassing would have a certain threshold for water retention? Mars clearly had water. If it were covered in , say 50% water, perhaps that wasn't enough to keep it there. Earth has a ratio of roughly 70% water to 30% land, I believe. I think that life may not have been as varied if the whole planet was water covered. Artificial land would require a high state of development. Also it seems that too low a percentage of land would not allow the explosion of evolution to happen quickly enough, before the planet becomes uninhabitable. Too much land would be too dry to retain any water at all, except what was in the soil or as ice caps. Both extreme ends of the ratio wouldn't allow a timely development of a varied mix of lifeforms. Sooo, I wonder if there is a narrow range where the developing planet keeps its water, dependant upon the atmospheric pressure, distance from the sun & other planets or bodies, temperature, & the water/land ratio? Your thoughts?
|