|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Focal Ratio.
Focal ratio, or f number, is the focal length of a lens, or mirror, divided by its diameter. A focal ratio of 8 would be written as f/8. An f/8 telescope is "slower" than an f/4. Fast telescopes give wider, brighter images with a given eyepiece than slower ones. In general, the slower the telescope, the more forgiving it is of defects in the objective / mirror and eyepiece. From: http://www.r-clarke.org.uk/telescope_glossary1.htm See Also : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-number |
|
||||
|
Thanks, but I don't think that's actually what I'm looking for. I'm not looking for something to do with the focal point or anything like that, just the physical dimension that basically corresponds to the diameter, but in the other direction. So in other words, if you were to put the lens in a box, the length and width of the box would be the diameter of the box; how tall would the box have to be? It may be that the word I'm looking for is simply "height".
If it helps, the manufacturer (a Japanese company) uses ET for "edge thickness," CT for "central thickness," and the acronym "DH" for this measurement. I guess it would be something like "drop height"? Edited to add part about acronym.
__________________
As above, so below |
|
||||
|
Wouldn't it just be the center thickness, with the apparent exception of negative power lenses (whatever that is)?
__________________
Lighten up! This is a stellar board! Author: duh. "The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the universe to do..." Author: Galileo supposedly. |
|
||||
|
No, because the thickness is the actual thickness of the lens itself. If I can give you an analogy, suppose you have a frisbee sitting on the ground. The center thickness would be the thickness of the plastic at the center of the frisbee. But I'm not looking for that. I'm looking for the thickness of the plastic plus the air that's under it (because of the rim).
__________________
As above, so below |
|
||||
|
He means this:
![]() No idea if there's a specific name for lenses or anything, but "saggital height" is the name for the height of the "cut" of a circle.
__________________
"I am accustomed, as a professional mathematician,
to living in a sort of vacuum, surrounded by people who declare with an odd sort of pride that they are mathematically illiterate." — David Mumford |
|
||||
|
Is that a "negative power lens"?
__________________
Lighten up! This is a stellar board! Author: duh. "The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the universe to do..." Author: Galileo supposedly. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|