Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 26-August-2006, 07:24 AM
taolung taolung is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3
Default Shrinking Sun

Hello all,

I'm debating a YEC (I hate myself...) and he tossed out some nonsense about how the sun is shrinking at such a rate that a few million years ago, it would have to have been so large that life on Earth couldn't have even survived.

Of course this assumes that the sun had to have been shrinking at a constant rate all that time. And I know that the information Creationists used to obtain this projection was quickly discredited - it's simply not accurate.

But it did get me to thinking - it makes sense that the sun is decreasing in mass as it's throwing out all the radiation, solar wind, etc. that it is. So my question is - how much mass is it actually loosing?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 26-August-2006, 07:41 AM
snarkophilus's Avatar
snarkophilus snarkophilus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,094
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taolung View Post
But it did get me to thinking - it makes sense that the sun is decreasing in mass as it's throwing out all the radiation, solar wind, etc. that it is. So my question is - how much mass is it actually loosing?
It's absorbing a bit of mass, too... after all, that's how it formed in the first place. A lot of what it ejects probably ends up inside it again.

I couldn't find any reliable sources in a quick initial search. I remember that Arnold Boothroyd at CITA published something about stellar evolution (I think in 2003), suggesting that the Sun was heavier in its young stages and predicting its future... you might see if you can find his web site and a link to something containing that information there.
__________________
"It's turtles all the way down."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 26-August-2006, 07:57 AM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,599
Default

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CE/CE310.html--when in doubt, Talk Origins should have your answer.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

Last edited by Gillianren; 26-August-2006 at 07:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 26-August-2006, 08:29 AM
cjl's Avatar
cjl cjl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: University of Colorado - Boulder
Posts: 2,294
Default

Gillian:

Did you mean to link to this?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 26-August-2006, 08:43 AM
Ken G's Avatar
Ken G Ken G is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,341
Default

The Sun loses mass at so slow a rate that in the next billion years it will still lose only about a thousandth of one percent of its mass, due to the solar wind. The mass loss due to nuclear burning is about the same.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 26-August-2006, 09:16 AM
Jeff Root Jeff Root is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 3,772
Default

And -- surprisingly -- it is probably now extremely rare for the Sun
to gain mass. Anything that falls into it is completely vaporized
before reaching the photosphere. The resulting vapor is blown
away by the solar wind.

There must be some minimum size body which can partially hold
together all the way into the photosphere to become part of the
Sun, but I don't know what that size is. Probably on the order
of kilometers in diameter even for a stone or iron body.

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis
__________________
http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

"The other planets?
Well, they just happen to be there, but the point of rockets is to explore them!"
-- Kai Yeves
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 26-August-2006, 09:54 AM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,599
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjl View Post
Gillian:

Did you mean to link to this?
Yes; apparently, the copy/paste didn't work. How odd.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 26-August-2006, 10:56 AM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,269
Default

It worked, you just included extraneous text within the URL tags.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 26-August-2006, 07:07 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,599
Default

No, I didn't; I let the computer add the extraneous text all by itself. I don't bother with url tabs, since the board'll do 'em automatically. I have gone back and edited, though.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 26-August-2006, 08:40 PM
Tim Thompson's Avatar
Tim Thompson Tim Thompson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,236
Lightbulb The Sun is not Yellow, it's Chicken

Here's something I wrote on the topic a few years ago: A Response to the Shrinking Sun Argument. It might use an update, but everything there is still correct. Since then there have been several more precise studies of the solar radius, and they are all in agreement with the same conclusion. The sun is not shrinking systematically in any observable manner.

In theory, over timescales of 10s or 100s of millions of years, the sun should contract slightly, in response to the decreasing efficiency of fusion in the core, as the hydrogen supply dwindles. But of course that will reverse itself dramatically when the sun swings into red giant mode, in 4 or 5 billion years.
__________________
Don't try this at home - We're what you call "professionals" - MythBusters.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today