|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello all,
I'm debating a YEC (I hate myself...) and he tossed out some nonsense about how the sun is shrinking at such a rate that a few million years ago, it would have to have been so large that life on Earth couldn't have even survived. Of course this assumes that the sun had to have been shrinking at a constant rate all that time. And I know that the information Creationists used to obtain this projection was quickly discredited - it's simply not accurate. But it did get me to thinking - it makes sense that the sun is decreasing in mass as it's throwing out all the radiation, solar wind, etc. that it is. So my question is - how much mass is it actually loosing? |
|
||||
|
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CE/CE310.html--when in doubt, Talk Origins should have your answer.
__________________
Gillian "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'" "You can't erase icing." "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!" Last edited by Gillianren; 26-August-2006 at 07:06 PM. |
|
|||
|
And -- surprisingly -- it is probably now extremely rare for the Sun
to gain mass. Anything that falls into it is completely vaporized before reaching the photosphere. The resulting vapor is blown away by the solar wind. There must be some minimum size body which can partially hold together all the way into the photosphere to become part of the Sun, but I don't know what that size is. Probably on the order of kilometers in diameter even for a stone or iron body. -- Jeff, in Minneapolis
__________________
http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/ "The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Gillian "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'" "You can't erase icing." "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!" |
|
||||
|
It worked, you just included extraneous text within the URL tags.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong? Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability. The Leif Ericson Cruiser |
|
||||
|
No, I didn't; I let the computer add the extraneous text all by itself. I don't bother with url tabs, since the board'll do 'em automatically. I have gone back and edited, though.
__________________
Gillian "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'" "You can't erase icing." "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!" |
|
||||
|
Here's something I wrote on the topic a few years ago: A Response to the Shrinking Sun Argument. It might use an update, but everything there is still correct. Since then there have been several more precise studies of the solar radius, and they are all in agreement with the same conclusion. The sun is not shrinking systematically in any observable manner.
In theory, over timescales of 10s or 100s of millions of years, the sun should contract slightly, in response to the decreasing efficiency of fusion in the core, as the hydrogen supply dwindles. But of course that will reverse itself dramatically when the sun swings into red giant mode, in 4 or 5 billion years.
__________________
Don't try this at home - We're what you call "professionals" - MythBusters. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|