If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2007, 06:16 AM
The Bad Astronomer's Avatar
The Bad Astronomer The Bad Astronomer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,932
Default Q & BA Questions thread

This thread is for questions BABlog readers have for me for the "Q & BA" feature on the Bad Astronomy Blog. If you have a question, post it here along with your name and region if you want me to use them (otherwise I'll use your BAUT handle).

Try to be succinct! I'll be reading the question on the video, and I might have to paraphrase.

Enjoy, and thanks!


Phil Plait, aka The Bad Astronomer
__________________
Phil Plait
The Bad Astronomer
http://www.badastronomy.com
badastro@badastronomy.com
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2007, 07:20 AM
ritchards's Avatar
ritchards ritchards is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5
Default

Okay, I'll go with a question (and, oh, my first post here!):

We know(*) that black holes exist, but what about white holes? Do they exist? Could they even theoretically exist?

(*) For a given value of "know".

Hmm...now, do I want to give my real name, being pretty sure you won't be able to pronounce it properly... let's see:

Jamas Enright, Wellington, New Zealand
(Jamas is like Shamus, but with a J.)
__________________
Cheers,
Thad Ritchards

"I reject your reality, and substitute my own." - Adam Savage, Mythbuster
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2007, 09:51 AM
Serenitude's Avatar
Serenitude Serenitude is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southeast Ohio
Posts: 2,422
Send a message via MSN to Serenitude
Default

I have a question. With space expanding faster than the speed of light, does a photon moving through space move in what a removed observer would see as a straight line, or is a photon moving through space affected by the expansion of space (ie, a straight line through expanding space, which to a removed observer would not appear straight?), and is this taken into account in observations of distant objects. Why or why not is light affected by expanding space?
__________________
"I have this theory that the Apollo missions were faked when NASA found out that general relativity was wrong because the Earth was expanding due to the Sun's iron core being influenced by magnetic waves from the electric universe after being perturbed by Planet X and thereby causing global warming. Where should I start a thread about this?" ~ ToSeek

"Those are the people that wonder how a thermos knows whether to keep something hot or keep something cold." ~ NeoWatcher

Last edited by Serenitude : 29-January-2007 at 09:52 AM. Reason: Succintiness :-)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2007, 10:52 AM
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Posts: 3,487
Send a message via MSN to Sticks
Default

Change of pace here, although I suspect it may have been covered in astronomycast so we are after your take on this one.

How do you get started in astronomy, what kind of equipment should you start out with, what is the best way to use a scope, (especially if you wear glasses do you look through the eyepiece with your glasses on or try and focus the eyepiece to your prescription)

And finally how can the dedicated ameteur contribute any discoveries to the main bodies of science.

forgot to add

Graeme Stickings - Newcastle upon Tyne, England
__________________
Van Rijn's original Invisible Elf was running for the North Carolina Senate, but dropped out of the contest after the paparazzi snapped him with a cute pixie just outside Disney World in Florida. Now he has settled down with her as they await their first child, writing his biography of life in Van Rijn's backyard, - Now you prove me wrong

Last edited by Sticks : 29-January-2007 at 10:54 AM. Reason: add name and location
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2007, 11:54 AM
Laguna2's Avatar
Laguna2 Laguna2 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Reiskirchen, Germany
Posts: 1,927
Send a message via ICQ to Laguna2
Default

Could you answer me where the ultra high energy cosmic "radiation" (I know its particles) comes from. I heard a video blog about it several years ago, but the astronomer said, back then, they where not quite sure about it and just had some ideas.

Martin Köster, Reiskirchen, Germany
__________________
"Who does not know anything, must believe everything."
Baroness Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach
1830-1916
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2007, 01:23 PM
maryccc's Avatar
maryccc maryccc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 169
Default

Can you explain galaxies to me. What is the easiest galaxy to view through a telescope and can I find a galaxy in my cheap tasco telescope? Will I actually be able to see it. I have heard that many galaxies have collided with us and we have eaten them up but will we ever be eaten up by another bigger and stronger galaxy? What does a galaxy consist of?
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2007, 01:56 PM
Thad Hatchett Thad Hatchett is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4
Default Q & Ba

I'll throw my hat in with a first time post. I have a timely question about comet McNaught. I read in a couple of places where comet McNaught was visible (at that time, unfortunately no longer) as both a morning comet and an evening comet. How could any object that sets after the sun, possibly rise again the following morning prior to the sun? Space.com listed both morning and evening finder charts.

Appreciate the help!

Thad Hatchett
Columbus, IN
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2007, 02:48 PM
Grand_Lunar's Avatar
Grand_Lunar Grand_Lunar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Earth-Moon system
Posts: 2,201
Default

Here's one that really has had me scratching my head:

Why does Saturn's moon Titan have a thick atmosphere, but Jupiter's Ganymede does not, even though they are similar in size (both being larger than Mercury)?

(you might have trouble with my last name. pronouced "okra-gles-key")

Scott Okragleski
Fort Lauderdale, FL
__________________
I calculated the odds of this succeeding versus the odds I was doing something incredibly stupid...and I went ahead anyway. - Crow T. Robot

Godspeed, John Glenn. - Scott Carpenter

And these atomic bombs that science burst upon the world that night were strange even to the men that used them.
- H.G Wells, The World Set Free

To the conspiracy crowd, radiation is a big Boogey Man that inspires terror and death in all who encounter it. - JayUtah

Last edited by Grand_Lunar : 04-February-2007 at 05:01 PM.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2007, 05:34 PM
George's Avatar
George George is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio, Tx.
Posts: 7,089
Default

1a) Care to offer a general heliochromological prognostication? [You might explain why false color is indeed far superior to troublesome true color, too.]

1b) Due to solar atmospheric opacity issues, the central region of the solar disk is 1390K hotter in appearance than the limb (~6390K vs. 5000K), so would the solar disk not appear to have a slightly bluish-white center? [Assumes an astronaut is seeing the sun from space and at a light level within the normal photopic range of the eye.]

2) Will the classification of stars ever be revised significantly?
__________________
Lighten up! This is a stellar board! Author: duh.

"The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the universe to do..." Author: Galileo supposedly.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2007, 05:47 PM
rdaneel rdaneel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 117
Default

As an astronomer, what is your take on the recent spate of books criticizing string theory's dominant position within physics? This would seem relevant to cosmological theories that are highly relevant to astronomy. I am thinking here of Lee Smolin's book "The Trouble with Physics", and Peter Woit's book "Not Even Wrong".
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2007, 07:19 PM
Dr Nigel's Avatar
Dr Nigel Dr Nigel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North-East England
Posts: 1,381
Default

Here's a couple* for you to think on, BA:
1) How were gamma-ray bursters first discovered/noticed/identified?
2) What are they?
3) How did we find this out?

Nigel Depledge
County Durham, England

*Edited to add: alright, three.
__________________
The quarrelsome oarsmen were rowing,
The great violinist was bowing;
But how is the sage
To tell, from the page:
Was it pigs or seeds that were sowing?
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2007, 07:31 PM
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Posts: 3,487
Send a message via MSN to Sticks
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Nigel View Post
Here's a couple* for you to think on, BA:
1) How were gamma-ray bursters first discovered/noticed/identified?
2) What are they?
3) How did we find this out?

Nigel Depledge
County Durham, England

*Edited to add: alright, three.
apologies for stealing Phils thunder on this one, but I posted a link here to a Horizon programme that covers this.
__________________
Van Rijn's original Invisible Elf was running for the North Carolina Senate, but dropped out of the contest after the paparazzi snapped him with a cute pixie just outside Disney World in Florida. Now he has settled down with her as they await their first child, writing his biography of life in Van Rijn's backyard, - Now you prove me wrong
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2007, 03:54 AM
JonFM97 JonFM97 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
Default

I was wondering about your opinion on the idea that the universe is not only stranger then we image but stranger then we can image. I know that's more of a Cosmology question but I'd like to know what the general opinions are among the scientific community on this idea. Thanks.
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 31-January-2007, 02:01 AM
Mr. Maxwell Mr. Maxwell is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1
Default Question From One Of My 4th Graders

I am a 4th grade math and science teacher. One of my students, Ashllee Garza, (it would be cool if you could say her name on your reply) asked me, "Why is it the larger planets that have the rings around them, not the smaller ones?"

I told her that I thought it was because the larger planets have stronger gravity allowing them to grab more stuff as it floated by, thus forming rings, but that I should probably ask a real astronomer.

Hope you choose this question.

Regards,
Jason Maxwell
Houston, Texas
Tipps Elementary
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 31-January-2007, 02:46 AM
bassmanpete bassmanpete is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4
Default

How do spacecraft make use of the slingshot effect? I can understand how the pull of a planet will accelerate the craft but once it's passed by won't the planet decelerate it by a similar amount? Or does the craft fire it's rockets to add to the effect?
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-February-2007, 10:14 PM
Matty Matty is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
Default

I have read that if you take a teaspoon of a neutron star it will weigh around 1000kg.

My question is that if you could actually extract a teaspoon of neutron star, what would happen to it?
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2007, 03:14 AM
thaumaturge's Avatar
thaumaturge thaumaturge is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4
Send a message via MSN to thaumaturge
Default Battlestar Galactica question

What did you think of the "supernova" depicted in the recent Battlestar Galactica episode (3x12)? It seemed kind of hokey to me.
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2007, 07:21 PM
satori's Avatar
satori satori is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Umnak, Aleutes
Posts: 539
Default

I threw this question allready at the community but got little resonance :
What about blowing a (glas-) bubble in space to confection a HUGE spherical mirror.... Could that work ? Could it be of any use ? Is that a total whacky scrab sort of an idea ?
Assemble an expert commission , please .........
(and remember you got it from me )
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-February-2007, 11:19 AM
Charlie in Dayton Charlie in Dayton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ...three guesses, and the first two don't count...
Posts: 2,009
Default Do we 'celebrate' the beginning of the seasons on the wrong days?

Do we 'celebrate' the beginning of the seasons on the wrong days?

The traditional first day of summer is around June 21, the 'longest day' of the year...but that ought to be the MIDDLE of summer, being the high point of the curve...

The traditional first day of winter is around December 21, the 'shortest day' of the year...but that ought to be the MIDDLE of winter, being the low point (so to speak) of the curve.

Some quick calculations and/or googling the concept 'cross quarter days' gives us the following information and "corrected" seasons:

A cross-quarter day is a day falling approximately halfway between one of the four main solar events (two solstices and two equinoxes) and the next one. These originated as pagan holidays in Northern Europe and the British Isles, and survive in modern times as neopagan holidays.

The cross-quarter days traditionally mark the start of spring, summer, autumn, and winter, respectively, and are:

* Imbolc or Imbolg (February 1) RELIGIOUS: Candlemas
* Beltane or Bealtaine (May 1) Walpurgis Night (Apr 30) / May Day (May 1)
* Lughnasadh or Lunasa (August 1) Lammas
* Samhain (November 1) Halloween (Oct 31), All Saints' Day (Nov 1), All Souls' Day (Nov 2)

Technically, the cross-quarter day is the start of a season -- the equinox or solstice marks the MIDDLE of a season.

Summer Solstice -- June 21
Winter Solstice -- December 22
Spring Equinox -- March 20
Autumn Equinox -- September 20

NOTE -- the above are for the Northern Hemisphere. In the Southern Hemisphere, the Equinox seasons are reversed -- Spring in Sept, Autumn in March

The Year Wheel
Winter Solstice -- December 22 -- midWinter
Imbolc -- February 1 -- first day of Spring
Spring Equinox -- March 20 -- midSpring
Beltane -- May 1 -- first day of Summer
Summer Solstice--June 21 -- midSummer
Lughnasadh -- August 1 -- first day of Autumn
Autumn Equinox -- September 20 -- midAutumn
Samhain -- November 1 --first day of Winter


SO -- are our seasonal celebrations about 45 days off from where they really ought to be?

Charlie Cotterman
Dayton OH
__________________
"If a tree is cut down in the rainforest, and is used to make paper to print a book, and the book is really bad, and there's nobody that will read it, do you still hear a sucking sound?"
Charlie in Dayton, A.AsC.
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 03-February-2007, 11:33 AM
Charlie in Dayton Charlie in Dayton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ...three guesses, and the first two don't count...
Posts: 2,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maryccc View Post
Can you explain galaxies to me. What is the easiest galaxy to view through a telescope and can I find a galaxy in my cheap tasco telescope? Will I actually be able to see it. I have heard that many galaxies have collided with us and we have eaten them up but will we ever be eaten up by another bigger and stronger galaxy? What does a galaxy consist of?
I'm going to steal a tad of the BA's thunder too...
1 -- the easiest galaxy to see at all is the Milky Way, because we're inside it. It's visible to the naked eye on a dark night as a band of stars running from Sagittarius up across the sky to Canis Major on the other side, according to my northern hemisphere star wheel (the MW continues on past these constellations, but is below the horizon then).
The easiest galaxy to see other than ours is M31, the Andromeda Galaxy. It is approximately 2.7 million light years away (ballpark math -- 186,000 miles per second X 60 seconds X 60 minutes X 24 hours X 365 days x 2,700,000 = miles), and is the furthest object visible to the naked eye. It is visible to the naked eye on a dark nite from a dark site, and easily visible even in small binoculars (the ubiquitous 7x35's).

2 -- in a few odd billion years or so, if I have the figures correct, the Andromeda Galaxy and the Milky Way will "collide" and rearrange each other. At this stage, no one's sure if the end will be two new galaxies, or one. See below for additional on this.

3 -- a galaxy consists mostly of empty space, so there are few if any actual planetary/star collisions. Other than that, there are hundreds upon thousands of stars (and there's no doubt that some of those stars have their own planets), and large clouds of dust and gas. There is a lot of change in orbits due to gravitational interactions, but there's not expected to be anything(s) running into each other.

Hope this helps, and an in-advance 'sorry about that, chief' to the BA if i'm in error somewhere or a toe got stepped on.
__________________
"If a tree is cut down in the rainforest, and is used to make paper to print a book, and the book is really bad, and there's nobody that will read it, do you still hear a sucking sound?"
Charlie in Dayton, A.AsC.
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-February-2007, 04:54 PM
VoijaRisa's Avatar
VoijaRisa VoijaRisa is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 4
Send a message via AIM to VoijaRisa
Default

Here's a simple but rather deep one that I think might be worthwhile:

How has being a skeptic improved your life?
__________________
  #22 (