Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 06-May-2008, 06:16 PM
tony873004 tony873004 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mugaliens View Post
...As for the oribital stability, if the smaller moon is close enough to the planet and the larger one aroub three times more distance, it should be a stable setup.
Seems like you nailed it.
__________________
www.gravitysimulator.com
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 06-May-2008, 07:43 PM
DyerWolf DyerWolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Dark Side of the Sun
Posts: 1,002
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mugaliens View Post
No problem. Here's a trig primer with enough basic trig to solve your eclipse problem.

As for the oribital stability, if the smaller moon is close enough to the planet and the larger one around three times more distance, it should be a stable setup.
Hey cool! Thanks for the link (amazing what's on Wiki these days...).

@ Tony: Thanks to you too. I presume your sim had the moon in its standard orbit - which is why the farther particles got flung?

FWIW: My thought experiment doesn't require reference to current theories of our moon's formation. My theoretical planet wouldn't necessarily have had to acquire its moons in the same way Earth did. As far as I know, none of the other planet's moons require an impactor-theory to describe why they have moons in the first place.

I am only guessing, but they probably got their moons through a capture process or as left over material from the planet's own formation that did not get absorbed into the planet itself. Something similar could account for the two-moon system I describe in the OP.

Your thoughts on retrograde moons is interesting, and something I hadn't thought about, considering there is only one or two moons (IIRC) in our solar system that have retrograde motion.

Doesn't retrograde capture require flinging another similarly sized object out of the planetary orbit?
__________________
Talent develops in quiet places, character in the full current of human life.
- Goethe

Jump in with both feet!
- Me, indulging my inner eight-year-old


*** *** ***

"Are you a mad-hatter that just types what he wishes, or have you actually any physics training?"
Occam's Ghost to Grant Hutchison.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 06-May-2008, 08:32 PM
grant hutchison grant hutchison is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DyerWolf View Post
Your thoughts on retrograde moons is interesting, and something I hadn't thought about, considering there is only one or two moons (IIRC) in our solar system that have retrograde motion.
Eighty-nine, by my quick count. Jupiter alone has 48 retrograde moons.
In fact, most of the outer moons of all the giant planets are retrograde: as Tony says, retrograde orbits are more stable, so they can persist at distances where direct orbits are unstable.

Grant Hutchison
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 06-May-2008, 09:32 PM
DyerWolf DyerWolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Dark Side of the Sun
Posts: 1,002
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grant hutchison View Post
Eighty-nine, by my quick count. Jupiter alone has 48 retrograde moons.
In fact, most of the outer moons of all the giant planets are retrograde: as Tony says, retrograde orbits are more stable, so they can persist at distances where direct orbits are unstable.

Grant Hutchison
Amazing what you learn when you blindly assert. Thanks for the update!

(I knew about Triton, but thought it was relatively unique. After your post, I googled and read the Wiki...)
__________________
Talent develops in quiet places, character in the full current of human life.
- Goethe

Jump in with both feet!
- Me, indulging my inner eight-year-old


*** *** ***

"Are you a mad-hatter that just types what he wishes, or have you actually any physics training?"
Occam's Ghost to Grant Hutchison.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 06:49 AM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 4,544
Default

So it would be not unreasonable to have an Earth-sized planet with two moons, one at 140K and one at 380K? Or one at 50K and one at 380K?

How about orbital periods for these worlds? Using this calculator
http://www.ajdesigner.com/phpgravity...ion_period.php
I get a period of about 1.3 days for the 50Kmoon, and about 6 days for the 140K moon. But that calculator assumes the moons are massless, I think.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 08:32 AM
Tog_'s Avatar
Tog_ Tog_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 2,875
Default

Okay, using Earth time scales here, could the second moon have been a captured body, like Ceres where it only exists as part of the system for about 100,000 years? It just happens to be the 100,000 year period where civilization developed.

Or could a it be captured after recorded history had begun? I'm thinking here of a system where a culture, say in the Bronze Age, had one sun and one moon and had all the appropriate myths in place, then all of the sudden this other moon swoops in and begins to assert control over the "established truths". What effect would that have had?
__________________
A Nerd can figure out how long it will take the original Enterprise traveling at warp 6.5 to travel from Regulus to Antares.
A Geek will think he can use that to pick up a girl in a bar.
A Dork knows he can't pick up the girl with it, but will hang around for hours anyway, just in case she asks.
She might. You never know.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 01:22 PM
DyerWolf DyerWolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Dark Side of the Sun
Posts: 1,002
Default

Either way, I'm seeing a strong influence on culture via religion, mythology, what have you.

If the moons are with the planet from around formation - every society will have a tradition that accounts for two peers to the sun god.

If the moon is a later capture, every society will have a tradition regarding the arrival of the Destroyer (presuming the new moon is not, in fact massless, its arrival will change the planet's tidal system; considering most people live in the littorals, the tides will affect them pretty strongly).
__________________
Talent develops in quiet places, character in the full current of human life.
- Goethe

Jump in with both feet!
- Me, indulging my inner eight-year-old


*** *** ***

"Are you a mad-hatter that just types what he wishes, or have you actually any physics training?"
Occam's Ghost to Grant Hutchison.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 03:17 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dortmund
Posts: 6,634
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by tony873004 View Post
Seems like you nailed it.


It's amazing what can occasionally be had through intuition.
__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol.

Mine: "Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often not a very good one at that."

Heinlein's: "Staying young requires the unceasing cultivation of the ability to unlearn old falsehoods." "Freedom begins when you tell Ms. Grundy to go fly a kite."
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 04:35 PM
tony873004 tony873004 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tog_ View Post
Or could it be captured after recorded history had begun?
Actually, this happened last year, but the additional moon was only about 4 meters across, and only stuck around for a few months. That's the biggest problem with this scenerio, with rare exception, a captured moon is not that stable:
http://www.orbitsimulator.com/cgi-bi...num=1182030550

Quote:
Originally Posted by eburacum45 View Post
I've never seen that link. Thanks. I've got my own collection of calculators I wrote, including a period calculator here: http://orbitsimulator.com/formulas . Mine has nicer units of mass
__________________
www.gravitysimulator.com
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 07:45 PM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 4,544
Default

Nice calculators, Tony! I'll add them to our list at OA.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are the Earth and moon a double planet? Jakenorrish Astronomy 27 11-January-2005 03:07 PM
HD 28185 exoplanet habitable? astro_kct Astronomy 42 12-October-2004 10:07 PM
Did Tiny 4inch Scope just Find "Goliath" Planet ? Launch window Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 6 29-August-2004 07:47 PM
Planet-X or Niburu, Nibiru, Nemesis or Marduk - hoax teegeeack Against the Mainstream 12 23-June-2003 01:28 AM
Transcript: Nancy On Lou Gentile (LONG) John Jones Against the Mainstream 15 15-June-2003 02:20 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today