Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 15-June-2008, 06:44 AM
Jens's Avatar
Jens Jens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,913
Default Discovery of Uranus

I just read somewhere that in the pre-Buddhist folk religion (the Nat Cult) in Burma, people believed that there were eight planets. Is it possible that they knew of Uranus? I wonder if this has been explored somewhere, but couldn't find any good information.
__________________
As above, so below
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 15-June-2008, 01:38 PM
JimJast JimJast is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 233
Default

They might since Uranus is visible to the naked eye.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 15-June-2008, 02:02 PM
Eroica's Avatar
Eroica Eroica is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dubh Linn
Posts: 3,639
Default

According to this website the Moon is the eighth planet in Burmese astrology...?
__________________
- Learn a lot teaching others.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 15-June-2008, 02:14 PM
Jens's Avatar
Jens Jens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eroica View Post
According to this website the Moon is the eighth planet in Burmese astrology...?
That makes sense in a way. But that doesn't solve the problem. Because (in arbitrary order) ancient people tended to recognize the following planets (in the loose sense of objects that move in comparison to the fixed stars, so that the sun and moon end up being planets):

1. sun
2. moon
3. mercury
4. venus
5. mars
6. jupiter
7. saturn

So what is the eighth? The possibilities are (1) that the Burmans saw the earth as a planet. This is something that seems unusual among ancient civilizations. Not necessarily because they didn't understand the earth as being similar, but that since we live on it, the earth doesn't move in the sky. Hence, there is no need to track it as an astronomical object. Then, possibility (2) is that there was something else, other than the 7 listed above, that the Burmans saw as a planet. What could it have been? Uranus is the only obvious candidate.
__________________
As above, so below
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 15-June-2008, 02:37 PM
Romanus Romanus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,348
Default

Though I think it's definitely possible, for my part I doubt that any ancients would notice a sixth-magnitude object with only a third of the sidereal motion of Saturn. Unfortunately, what we don't know about ancient astronomy is so much greater than what we do that there may never be an answer to such pre-telescopic questions.
__________________
"Call me old-fashioned, but I think fire is magic. And it scares me a lot."

--The State
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 15-June-2008, 02:41 PM
AndreasJ's Avatar
AndreasJ AndreasJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Linköping, Sweden
Posts: 276
Send a message via ICQ to AndreasJ Send a message via Skype™ to AndreasJ
Default

According to a book about stellar myths by astronomer Peter Nilson*, ancient Indian astronomers considered the lunar nodes (ie. the points where the Moon's path cross the ecliptic) as "planets". While they're of course imaginary and invisible, they do behave planet-like in that they circle the ecliptic in 18 and a bit years. May the Burmese have had the same idea?

(FWIW, the WP article says they're important in Vedic astrology, but doesn't say anything about being considered "planets".)


* Himlavalvets sällsamheter, ISBN 91 29 61697 2. I have no idea wether it was ever translated into English.
__________________
"Illuminati's Razor - The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer."
-- Fazor
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 15-June-2008, 03:25 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jens View Post
Then, possibility (2) is that there was something else, other than the 7 listed above, that the Burmans saw as a planet. What could it have been? Uranus is the only obvious candidate.
What did they think of the occasional comet? Did the culture last long enough to ever see two comets at once, or, if they did, might they lump them as one because of appearance? Was their math good enough to recoginze two separate comets as being different?
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0....
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 15-June-2008, 06:34 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 7,978
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreasJ View Post
According to a book about stellar myths by astronomer Peter Nilson*, ancient Indian astronomers considered the lunar nodes (ie. the points where the Moon's path cross the ecliptic) as "planets". While they're of course imaginary and invisible, they do behave planet-like in that they circle the ecliptic in 18 and a bit years. May the Burmese have had the same idea?
According to this webpage, the earliest references to Rahu (which became the Burmese invisible 8th planet) were in Indian texts where he is an invisible planet that eclipses the Sun. OK, I can see that--early on, it might not be obvious that the moon was responsible for a solar eclipse. Later, the Indian astronomers borrowed the name for one of the nodes of the moon, after they'd figured things out, but the Burmese apparently stayed with the invisible planet Rahu idea.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 15-June-2008, 07:17 PM
astromark's Avatar
astromark astromark is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wanganui, New Zealand.
Posts: 2,439
Default

I have seen evidence that the pre European Maori had Venus as two objects. When in the west as the evening star and as a completely separate object months later as a morning object. This could be the same for the Burmese... ask them.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 16-June-2008, 12:26 PM
Jeff Root Jeff Root is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 3,767
Default

When I read the original post I immediately came up with several possibilities,
but one by one you've coverd them all, with Mark bringing up the most likely:
the Morning Star and Evening Star being different planets.

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis
__________________
http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

"The other planets?
Well, they just happen to be there, but the point of rockets is to explore them!"
-- Kai Yeves
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 16-June-2008, 09:58 PM
Romanus Romanus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,348
Default

Re astromark: I do believe you're right; the Greeks had a similar belief concerning Venus, IIRC.
__________________
"Call me old-fashioned, but I think fire is magic. And it scares me a lot."

--The State
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 17-June-2008, 03:40 AM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 7,978
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by astromark View Post
This could be the same for the Burmese... ask them.
It appears that the Burmese call the eighth planet Rahu. The invisible planet that causes eclipses, borrowed from early Indian astronomical thought.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
STS-114 Timeline Overview Cylinder Space Exploration 15 28-July-2005 08:29 PM
Solution to mystery of Uranus and Neptune magnetic fields an resenmut Against the Mainstream 27 18-March-2004 07:05 PM
"Ice giant" formation and Uranus' interior. Zero Signal Astronomy 4 11-February-2004 03:35 AM
Questions about "ice giant" formation and Uranus' Zero Signal Astronomy 0 02-February-2004 07:29 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today