|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
According to this website the Moon is the eighth planet in Burmese astrology...?
__________________
- Learn a lot teaching others. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
1. sun 2. moon 3. mercury 4. venus 5. mars 6. jupiter 7. saturn So what is the eighth? The possibilities are (1) that the Burmans saw the earth as a planet. This is something that seems unusual among ancient civilizations. Not necessarily because they didn't understand the earth as being similar, but that since we live on it, the earth doesn't move in the sky. Hence, there is no need to track it as an astronomical object. Then, possibility (2) is that there was something else, other than the 7 listed above, that the Burmans saw as a planet. What could it have been? Uranus is the only obvious candidate.
__________________
As above, so below |
|
|||
|
Though I think it's definitely possible, for my part I doubt that any ancients would notice a sixth-magnitude object with only a third of the sidereal motion of Saturn. Unfortunately, what we don't know about ancient astronomy is so much greater than what we do that there may never be an answer to such pre-telescopic questions.
__________________
"Call me old-fashioned, but I think fire is magic. And it scares me a lot." --The State |
|
||||
|
According to a book about stellar myths by astronomer Peter Nilson*, ancient Indian astronomers considered the lunar nodes (ie. the points where the Moon's path cross the ecliptic) as "planets". While they're of course imaginary and invisible, they do behave planet-like in that they circle the ecliptic in 18 and a bit years. May the Burmese have had the same idea?
(FWIW, the WP article says they're important in Vedic astrology, but doesn't say anything about being considered "planets".) * Himlavalvets sällsamheter, ISBN 91 29 61697 2. I have no idea wether it was ever translated into English.
__________________
"Illuminati's Razor - The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer." -- Fazor |
|
||||
|
What did they think of the occasional comet? Did the culture last long enough to ever see two comets at once, or, if they did, might they lump them as one because of appearance? Was their math good enough to recoginze two separate comets as being different?
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0.... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
I have seen evidence that the pre European Maori had Venus as two objects. When in the west as the evening star and as a completely separate object months later as a morning object. This could be the same for the Burmese... ask them.
|
|
|||
|
When I read the original post I immediately came up with several possibilities,
but one by one you've coverd them all, with Mark bringing up the most likely: the Morning Star and Evening Star being different planets. -- Jeff, in Minneapolis
__________________
http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/ "The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves |
|
|||
|
Re astromark: I do believe you're right; the Greeks had a similar belief concerning Venus, IIRC.
__________________
"Call me old-fashioned, but I think fire is magic. And it scares me a lot." --The State |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| STS-114 Timeline Overview | Cylinder | Space Exploration | 15 | 28-July-2005 08:29 PM |
| Solution to mystery of Uranus and Neptune magnetic fields an | resenmut | Against the Mainstream | 27 | 18-March-2004 07:05 PM |
| "Ice giant" formation and Uranus' interior. | Zero Signal | Astronomy | 4 | 11-February-2004 03:35 AM |
| Questions about "ice giant" formation and Uranus' | Zero Signal | Astronomy | 0 | 02-February-2004 07:29 PM |