|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Ouch. Ouch ouch ouch.
-- Jeff, in Minneapolis
__________________
http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/ "The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Now a photon does not have mass, never had any, never will have any, it has momentum though. A photon in an magnetic or electric field does not obtain any mass, it does not do much at all in those fields. no no, mass can be at rest too, no problem, that's why we have couch potatoes. Quote:
So, particles can "hitch a ride" on a plasma wave, however, these waves usually do not travel at the speed of light, so there is no problem for the particle to reach the wave velocity.
__________________
************************************************** ************************* Optimism does not change the laws of physics. (T'Pol) A good scientist has freed himself of concepts and keeps his mind open to what is. (Dao De Jing 27) ************************************************** ************************* Martin ( http://www.geocities.com/DrMartinV ) |
|
|||
|
I believe that it may have mass if you are in the same reference frame as the particle (irregardless of the field its in), and you and the particle see a reference point move by at the speed of light. It does not have mass if you see the particle move at velocity c, with respect to yourself. I could be wrong. Its all a question of reference frames.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
correct information hidden in there -- it just happens to be exactly backwards. Massive things don't have to be moving, but massless things do. Light is always in motion, relative to everyone. -- Jeff, in Minneapolis
__________________
http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/ "The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
We are born blank, we are what we are taught, right or wrong - me |
|
||||
|
There is actually something interesting that emerges from thinking about this question. If it were possible for a zero-mass particle to have a charge (that probably isn't possible, but let's imagine it), then in the presence of a magnetic field, that zero-mass particle would not have to be moving at the speed of light. In fact, it would be impossible to get any motion relative to that magnetic field-- the massless particle would be completely "frozen in" to the field by the Lorentz force. So it does not appear to be true in all hypothetical situations that a massless particle must move at the speed of light. This hypothetical particle, in the "guiding center" picture, would actually act as if it had infinite inertia but no rest mass (by virtue of its connections with the magnetic sources).
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thats basically why I asked the question. My thinking is that if a massless Photon could carry a charge within its frequency somehow, that it may interact with particles on a quark level or something to that effect. Or that possibly the photon could carry a Neutrino with its small mass in the same fashion? If you see my post in ATM about Photons creating Elements you'll see what I'm hypothesizing?
__________________
We are born blank, we are what we are taught, right or wrong - me Last edited by coliver; 13-July-2008 at 07:40 AM. |
|
||||
|
I was just wondering what would happen if a massless particle had a charge, not if a particle with mass were dragged by a photon (it could not be dragged at c). It is probably impossible for a particle with zero mass to have a charge, but it is normally assumed that any such particle would have to be moving at c, on the grounds that any electric potential that it encountered would convey energy to it, and any energy would require motion at c. I was wondering if a magnetic field could prevent that, but any electric potential along the direction of the magnetic field would still produce that result-- it would have to move at c. Don't ask me what happens if a charge moves at c! That's the part that is probably impossible.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
thats an interesting possibility too? My thinking has been that maybe the magnetic field acts as an insulator? Kind of like a sheathing or insulation on a wire. Once the photon makes contact with a mass the result would be absorption or reflection of the radiation, but on the way down its insulated.
__________________
We are born blank, we are what we are taught, right or wrong - me |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why There's More Matter Than Antimatter in the Universe | Fraser | Universe Today Story Comments | 29 | 30-April-2008 01:38 PM |
| Anomalous Acceleration of Pioneer 10 and 11 | Chip | Against the Mainstream | 476 | 03-March-2007 05:07 AM |
| Moon Rocks - List of Investigators, July 1969 | Kiwi | Conspiracy Theories | 18 | 02-February-2005 11:36 AM |
| Androids and Unified Theory. | Synchro | Against the Mainstream | 2 | 09-October-2004 03:49 AM |
| Vacuum | FREEDOMROX | Astronomy | 60 | 21-November-2003 03:34 PM |