|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quantifying the Risk Posed by Potential Earth Impacts Quote:
So, perhaps the answer to your question is that most of the 50-meter bodies over the past few thousand years have been stony objects, and have created airbursts which leave little long-lasting damage on the ground below. |
|
||||
|
I thought I read that Barringer Crater is well preserved because of Arizona's arid climate. Maybe its age-cohort crater members have washed away much in their locations' rains and/or been covered by their locations' rich flora. I'd expect they'd be known about, just maybe not famously obvious.
Like this: University of Arizona: Barringer Meteor Crater and Its Environmental Effects Quote:
Wikipedia has a list of notable impact craters on Earth, ending with recent ones: Quote:
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
Barringer crater is relatively well-preserved due to it's dry environment which minimizes erosion due to rain. By comparison, impacts into ice, softer soils, or areas where the water table is near the surface, such as Florida, might escape notice altogether.
There is one lake that I know of in Florida that's almost perfectly round, about a mile across, and it's bottom is entirely of sand, and concave, with a gentle slope towards the middle, which is around 250 to 300 ft deep. The lake is spring fed, with only one small creek as it's outflow.
__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol. Human. Whoever says "perception is reality" is daft. It's merely an abstraction, and often not a very good one. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
1000 BC sounds absurdly archaic to most people, but it actually isn't. There is a plethora of documents from that era, divided up between several cultures (Egypt, the Levant, Babylon, Assyria, etc.). The Dead Sea is smack dab in the middle of the commerce routes and was an important area. If something like Tunguska had happened there anytime in the 2nd or 1st millenium (i.e. BC), we would definitely know about it.
__________________
I've become used to the taste of crow. Last edited by kleindoofy; 17-July-2008 at 01:07 AM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The ULTIMATE astronomy quiz | Glom | Astronomy | 4239 | 01-December-2008 01:30 PM |
| Can we detect asteroid impacts with rocky extrasolar planets? | Blob | Astronomy | 5 | 14-December-2006 05:51 PM |
| Is 1 Ceres still an Asteroid? (Wiki & IAU) | kheider | Astronomy | 28 | 15-October-2006 10:14 AM |
| Gravity versus the Young-Earth Creationists | harlequin | Against the Mainstream | 202 | 25-March-2004 01:12 PM |
| Whew! Asteroid impacts not as dangerous as thought | ToSeek | Astronomy | 35 | 29-January-2002 09:05 PM |