Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Science and Technology
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 15-October-2004, 10:49 PM
John Dlugosz John Dlugosz is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 576
Default Re: Is Light Matter?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boris
My son did the experiment, determined that shining light into the glass did not make it overflow, and concluded that light was not matter. He was told he must have made a mistake! What the &^$#!? (Other kids found that shining light into the glass DID make it overflow. Our future in science! Go figure...)

Try cotton balls. I guess they're not matter?

How about salt?
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 15-October-2004, 10:59 PM
John Dlugosz John Dlugosz is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 576
Default Re: What is light?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tobin Dax
Electric and magnetic fields are produced/governed (I can't think of better words right now) by exchanges of photons.
e and m fields are made of virtual photons, OK.

But I'm also told that light is made out of mutually-inducing e and m fields! So says Maxwell's equasions.

Isn't that going in circles?
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 15-October-2004, 11:04 PM
John Dlugosz John Dlugosz is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evan

The Casimir effect indicates otherwise. It is not conjecture either, it is an experimentally verfiable effect.
I hadn't heard that the speed of light had been measured transverse to the plates of the casimir chamber. I read that it would be very difficult to do so, but that was some time ago. Do you have a link?
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2004, 12:39 AM
Evan Evan is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Williams Lake, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,522
Default

The Casimir effect was quantitatively verified in 1996 by Lamoreaux to high precision. It follows according to QED (Feynman) and calulations by Scharnhorst that the speed of light must be affected by the reduction in zero point energy. Another paper here.

I am not sure if anyone has experimentally verified the increase in C as yet but I seem to recall that it has been done. The effect was tiny, something like 10^-12 or some such. But it's not how well the bear dances, it's that he dances at all.
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 18-October-2004, 04:54 PM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 5,735
Default

That tiny volume of space between the Casimir plates is depleted in energy; in other words it has a lower energy than the ordinary vacuum...
I don't find it surprising that the speed of light is faster in such a volume of space- the problem is trying to use that effect.

I still think wormholes (which also use negative values of energy) offer a better prospect than faster than light drives.

But I am not going to hold my breath...
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 03-November-2004, 06:35 PM
Boris Boris is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: charlottesville, VA
Posts: 158
Default Thank you all!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Hopefully, Boris got all he wanted to know.
Yes, thank you all for very interesting posts and including the diversions into Casimir force, etc.

The teacher has recanted. Her source was not some state educational materials thank goodness (it was the internet! no surprise. madscinet to be precise). She said she told the class that light was not matter.

Then this past week my son took some science test, state mandated, in which the question came up (identify the item that is not matter. Among four choices was light). The correct answer in the test was that light is not matter.

So I am relieved.

Learned a lot about light the past few weeks!

Boris
__________________
"science is where culture rubs against nature" - Stanislaw Lem, His Master's Voice
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 03-November-2004, 06:55 PM
Laser Jock's Avatar
Laser Jock Laser Jock is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 861
Default Re: Thank you all!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boris
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Hopefully, Boris got all he wanted to know.
Yes, thank you all for very interesting posts and including the diversions into Casimir force, etc.

The teacher has recanted. Her source was not some state educational materials thank goodness (it was the internet! no surprise. madscinet to be precise). She said she told the class that light was not matter.

Then this past week my son took some science test, state mandated, in which the question came up (identify the item that is not matter. Among four choices was light). The correct answer in the test was that light is not matter.

So I am relieved.

Learned a lot about light the past few weeks!

Boris
That's great to hear! Thanks for the update.
__________________
Old laser physicists never die, they just become incoherent.
These days, every Tom, Dick, and Harry thinks he knows what a photon is, but he is wrong. - Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 06-November-2009, 07:17 PM
Truth Truth is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
Default Solution

Light i not matter, because the definition of matter is:

´´Matter is everything that weighs and occupies a place``

You cannot touch or weigh light, there for it is not matter, light is an electromagnetic radiation of a wavelenght that is visible to the human eye!

I hope i helped the problem
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2009, 08:43 AM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 12,607
Default

Just over five years!!!

Is this a new record for thread necromancy?
__________________
If I set the budget, we'd have Ares and more. Unfortunately, I don't set the budget, and Ares is just too expensive and too far out for us to accomplish our goals within the budget we were given.

If we halt the ISS, all versions of Ares, and transport Orion and Altair aboard DIRECTv3's Jupiter family of Shuttle-Derived Launch Vehicles, we just might make it back to the Moon by 2020.
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2009, 12:26 PM
Maur Maur is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7
Default

And the debate rages on! Seriously, i though it's the opposite, that matter is a nice misconception useful when dealing with macroscopic world.

Last edited by Maur; 07-November-2009 at 04:55 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2009, 12:32 AM
m74z00219 m74z00219 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Dlugosz View Post
e and m fields are made of virtual photons, OK.

But I'm also told that light is made out of mutually-inducing e and m fields! So says Maxwell's equasions.

Isn't that going in circles?
I think what you meant was that photons mediate the electromagnetic force.

----

I would say that energy is something apart from matter. There is no such thing as energy particles. Bosons (eg: photons) are matter just like fermions (the quarks that make up protons for instance or leptons like electrons).

Energy, on the other hand, is that which causes change (or prevents it in the face of competing forces). Like ionizing radiation causing an emission nebula to glow. The photons emitted by the local star have energy, but I wouldn't say that they are energy.

I could see how one would be tempted to call everything energy, because every thing possesses energy; however, it seems to me important to make room the subtle difference between having energy and being energy.




M74
__________________
I pray to no one.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today