Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Science and Technology
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 13-December-2007, 06:08 PM
Jetlack Jetlack is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G O R T View Post
Surely you jest.

One might think that the general population should be up to par with the hand selected few in the popular media. One would be wrong. This is something of a moral dilemma, as it skews our views of the world most of us see so little of. Check out your parents yearbooks, check out your own yearbooks, it's suprising how often our perceptions of our own past fails to live up to photographic scrutiny.
Oh yeah i love looking at those 70s pics!

But anyways it doesnt really matter whether we are getting more attractive or not because soon there wont be a need for attraction to lubricate the wheels of reproduction.

Sex will become more and more a recreational activitiy as opposed to necessity for survival of the species.

We already have IV and theoretically we could manage humanities reproductive cycle without anyone having sex at all. Im not suggesting this just saying its technically feasible.

And for how long will women want to carry babies arounf for 9 months in theur gut? I predict within 500 years women will have the choice of bringing their child to term in some sort of incubator.

If i was a woman i would prefer that. No stretch marks etc :-)
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 13-December-2007, 06:13 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 17,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetlack View Post
Sex will become more and more a recreational activitiy as opposed to necessity for survival of the species.
I don't have all data, but I suspect this is already true, and probably has been for a very long time.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 13-December-2007, 07:05 PM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetlack View Post
And for how long will women want to carry babies arounf for 9 months in theur gut? I predict within 500 years women will have the choice of bringing their child to term in some sort of incubator.
Maybe a lot sooner than that. Artificial wombs have already been used to give birth to goats and other large mammals, but there are sometimes medical complications. Once the process becomes less risky, it may become a viable option for human birth.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
"The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 14-December-2007, 09:32 AM
Jetlack Jetlack is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noclevername View Post
Maybe a lot sooner than that. Artificial wombs have already been used to give birth to goats and other large mammals, but there are sometimes medical complications. Once the process becomes less risky, it may become a viable option for human birth.
I bet even when this is available you will get women who refuse and want to give birth normally. A bit like women insisteing on breastfeeding their babies in public :-)

Women might feel unwanted if we have incubators that do the job.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 14-December-2007, 03:41 PM
CodeSlinger's Avatar
CodeSlinger CodeSlinger is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Gilead-that-Was
Posts: 746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetlack
Women might feel unwanted if we have incubators that do the job.
I'm hoping you're not serious...
__________________
"It's over you head now. Time to get some professional help." - My fortune cookie from lunch

Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial

Usenet Physics FAQ

Last edited by CodeSlinger; 14-December-2007 at 04:12 PM.. Reason: Edited to curb my grouchiness.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No such thing as THE Theory of Evolution Aristotle Science and Technology 142 21-October-2008 07:52 AM
ID, Intelligent Design nokton Science and Technology 156 21-May-2006 01:24 PM
Life's Recent Origin Darth_Racer Life in Space 120 31-March-2003 02:33 PM
Evolution Debate JS Princeton Against the Mainstream 38 11-February-2003 11:52 PM
CNN says fossil discovery questions human evolution theory beskeptical Small Media at Large 3 06-July-2002 07:55 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today