Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Science and Technology
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #781 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 03:37 PM
teddyv's Avatar
teddyv teddyv is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New West, BC
Posts: 601
Default

That rock is a bit small to make a good ID. It definitely looks like a matrix-supported conglomerate, with and outside possibility a lapilli tuff to agglomerate. Without the larger context of where it's from (and I'm not assuming dojmo is incorrect) it's tough to make the actual call based on a photo.
__________________
Earth First! We'll mine the rest later.
Reply With Quote
  #782 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 03:51 PM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geonuc View Post
I agree. You'd have to do some mineralogy to narrow down what species of feldspar it is.

Pink = K-spar
I agree that you'd have to do some mineralogical analysis to narrow down what species of feldspar it is. But, I tend to think it is orthoclase. Quite an interesting igneous intrusion, nonetheless.

Eric
__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site
Reply With Quote
  #783 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 03:54 PM
jlhredshift's Avatar
jlhredshift jlhredshift is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Madison, Ohio
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teddyv View Post
That rock is a bit small to make a good ID. It definitely looks like a matrix-supported conglomerate, with and outside possibility a lapilli tuff to agglomerate. Without the larger context of where it's from (and I'm not assuming dojmo is incorrect) it's tough to make the actual call based on a photo.
Details, details.

The friend that picked the rock up just looked down and decided it would be a good rock to take back to me, and I appreciate it. However, the flickr link does allow a fair amount of enlargement.
__________________
(By the way, I hate it that so many papers in the areas of planetary science and geology are not easily available to the dreaded "non-subscribers". It is like they are screaming at me: "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH". Good, I feel better now.)

"Quaerendo inventis"
Reply With Quote
  #784 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 04:06 PM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Default

Here's an outcrop I found just this last summer just outside Oolitic, IN. As it turned out it just happened to be a prehistoric coral reef dating back to the Silurian through Devonian. From this outcrop I was able to extract the fossil pictured below which contains polypora (coral) and scallop-like shells.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg outcrop.jpg (76.2 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg polypora_01.jpg (53.5 KB, 5 views)
__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site
Reply With Quote
  #785 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 04:12 PM
jlhredshift's Avatar
jlhredshift jlhredshift is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Madison, Ohio
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricFD View Post
Here's an outcrop I found just this last summer just outside Oolitic, IN. As it turned out it just happened to be a prehistoric coral reef dating back to the Silurian through Devonian. From this outcrop I was able to extract the fossil pictured below which contains polypora (coral) and scallop-like shells.
I see Brachiopods.

Nice piece.
__________________
(By the way, I hate it that so many papers in the areas of planetary science and geology are not easily available to the dreaded "non-subscribers". It is like they are screaming at me: "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH". Good, I feel better now.)

"Quaerendo inventis"
Reply With Quote
  #786 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 04:15 PM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Default

If you're having trouble viewing the full-sized image of the fossil from the thumbnail as am I, here's another image of it.

__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site
Reply With Quote
  #787 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 04:22 PM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlhredshift View Post
I see Brachiopods.

Nice piece.
Thanks, jlhredshift. But actually what looks like Brachiopods is one of two types of Polypora, which may be more apparent in the larger image.
__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site
Reply With Quote
  #788 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 04:25 PM
teddyv's Avatar
teddyv teddyv is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New West, BC
Posts: 601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlhredshift View Post
Details, details.

The friend that picked the rock up just looked down and decided it would be a good rock to take back to me, and I appreciate it. However, the flickr link does allow a fair amount of enlargement.
I did blow up the flickr photo as much as possible on the site. There really is no substitute for standing right at the outcrop with a hammer and a hand lens.
__________________
Earth First! We'll mine the rest later.
Reply With Quote
  #789 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 04:28 PM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teddyv View Post
I did blow up the flickr photo as much as possible on the site. There really is no substitute for standing right at the outcrop with a hammer and a hand lens.
I couldn't agree more, teddyv!
__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site
Reply With Quote
  #790 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 04:30 PM
jlhredshift's Avatar
jlhredshift jlhredshift is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Madison, Ohio
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricFD View Post
Thanks, jlhredshift. But actually what looks like Brachiopods is one of two types of Polypora, which may be more apparent in the larger image.
Well, I am referring to what you have described as "scallop".
__________________
(By the way, I hate it that so many papers in the areas of planetary science and geology are not easily available to the dreaded "non-subscribers". It is like they are screaming at me: "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH". Good, I feel better now.)

"Quaerendo inventis"
Reply With Quote
  #791 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 04:57 PM
geonuc's Avatar
geonuc geonuc is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricFD View Post
Thanks, jlhredshift. But actually what looks like Brachiopods is one of two types of Polypora, which may be more apparent in the larger image.
Are you referring to the larger, fan-shaped fossil at center-right of the rock?
Reply With Quote
  #792 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 05:02 PM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlhredshift View Post
Well, I am referring to what you have described as "scallop".
You mean the trace fossil at the bottom right edge? That is a scallop-like fossil. All the rest are polypora. If you could see the fossil yourself under magnification you would see that I am right. Believe me, I've analyzed and researched this particular specimen at great length.

Eric
__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site
Reply With Quote
  #793 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 05:06 PM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geonuc View Post
Are you referring to the larger, fan-shaped fossil at center-right of the rock?
The larger fan-shaped fossil at center-right is one of two types of polypora in this specimen. Believe me, I have researched this specimen at great length. It is a type of polypora. Of that I am certain. You really have to see the specimen in person.
__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site
Reply With Quote
  #794 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 05:14 PM
jlhredshift's Avatar
jlhredshift jlhredshift is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Madison, Ohio
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricFD View Post
The larger fan-shaped fossil at center-right is one of two types of polypora in this specimen. Believe me, I have researched this specimen at great length. It is a type of polypora. Of that I am certain. You really have to see the specimen in person.
I certainly do not claim to be an expert on polypora. A higher resolution picture might be interesting.
__________________
(By the way, I hate it that so many papers in the areas of planetary science and geology are not easily available to the dreaded "non-subscribers". It is like they are screaming at me: "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH". Good, I feel better now.)

"Quaerendo inventis"
Reply With Quote
  #795 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 05:23 PM
teddyv's Avatar
teddyv teddyv is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New West, BC
Posts: 601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlhredshift View Post
I certainly do not claim to be an expert on polypora. A higher resolution picture might be interesting.
And it's been a long time since my paleontology courses, so I can't add too much to this discussion.
__________________
Earth First! We'll mine the rest later.
Reply With Quote
  #796 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2009, 05:28 PM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlhredshift View Post
I certainly do not claim to be an expert on polypora. A higher resolution picture might be interesting.
I wish I had one, jlhredshift. But believe me when I say it was hard enough just getting this shot! LOL

Eric
__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site
Reply With Quote
  #797 (permalink)  
Old 28-October-2009, 10:05 AM
geonuc's Avatar
geonuc geonuc is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricFD View Post
The larger fan-shaped fossil at center-right is one of two types of polypora in this specimen. Believe me, I have researched this specimen at great length. It is a type of polypora. Of that I am certain. You really have to see the specimen in person.
I believe you.

If I was to speculate, I'd guess the fossil towards the center-left is a brachiopod.
Reply With Quote
  #798 (permalink)  
Old 28-October-2009, 12:54 PM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geonuc View Post
I believe you.

If I was to speculate, I'd guess the fossil towards the center-left is a brachiopod.
Now, that's a possibility! Unfortunately, there isn't enough of it left to be certain.

Eric
__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site
Reply With Quote
  #799 (permalink)  
Old 28-October-2009, 11:08 PM
geonuc's Avatar
geonuc geonuc is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricFD View Post
Now, that's a possibility! Unfortunately, there isn't enough of it left to be certain.
Well, now I've had to crack open my paleontology textbook. The fossil on the left seems to be exhibiting a delthyrial opening, looking kind of like head-on to a manta ray.
Reply With Quote
  #800 (permalink)  
Old 01-November-2009, 01:36 AM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Talking A Nice Gneiss

Gray and Granitic Gneiss. This one was just a little bit too big to fit into my backpack! LOL I love metamorphic rocks!


Gray and Granitic Gneiss
__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site
Reply With Quote
  #801 (permalink)  
Old 02-November-2009, 04:16 PM
teddyv's Avatar
teddyv teddyv is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New West, BC
Posts: 601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricFD View Post
Gray and Granitic Gneiss. This one was just a little bit too big to fit into my backpack! LOL I love metamorphic rocks!
Metamorphic rocks are probably my favourite group as well. There are just more interesting minerals in the assemblages. Although a current project we are working on has some of the nastiest group of rocks as far as identification we've come across. There is something like 3 or 4 deformation phases and 3 alteration events. We think the protolith is mostly volcanic with some sediments, but nobody can really tell for sure.
__________________
Earth First! We'll mine the rest later.
Reply With Quote
  #802 (permalink)  
Old 02-November-2009, 10:10 PM
jlhredshift's Avatar
jlhredshift jlhredshift is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Madison, Ohio
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teddyv View Post
Metamorphic rocks are probably my favourite group as well. There are just more interesting minerals in the assemblages. Although a current project we are working on has some of the nastiest group of rocks as far as identification we've come across. There is something like 3 or 4 deformation phases and 3 alteration events. We think the protolith is mostly volcanic with some sediments, but nobody can really tell for sure.
The word "tortured" comes to mind.

Pictures, possibly???
__________________
(By the way, I hate it that so many papers in the areas of planetary science and geology are not easily available to the dreaded "non-subscribers". It is like they are screaming at me: "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH". Good, I feel better now.)

"Quaerendo inventis"
Reply With Quote
  #803 (permalink)  
Old 02-November-2009, 10:47 PM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teddyv View Post
Metamorphic rocks are probably my favourite group as well. There are just more interesting minerals in the assemblages. Although a current project we are working on has some of the nastiest group of rocks as far as identification we've come across. There is something like 3 or 4 deformation phases and 3 alteration events. We think the protolith is mostly volcanic with some sediments, but nobody can really tell for sure.
Yes, metamorphic petrology, I believe, is the toughest of the three branches of petrology, simply because of the complexities involved. These rocks many times have undergone such extreme deformations and transformations that it can be extremely difficult, to put it mildly, to figure out what was there to begin with. I've seen groups of rocks like that ones to which you referred that stubbornly defy analysis. This is probably why so many field geologists avoid studying metamorphic rocks. I love them even though they can be a royal pain to try to understand.
__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site
Reply With Quote
  #804 (permalink)  
Old 03-November-2009, 03:58 PM
teddyv's Avatar
teddyv teddyv is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New West, BC
Posts: 601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlhredshift View Post
The word "tortured" comes to mind.

Pictures, possibly???
I’ll see if I can post something. Since they are technically our client’s property I’ll need to confirm that I could post something like that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricFD View Post
Yes, metamorphic petrology, I believe, is the toughest of the three branches of petrology, simply because of the complexities involved. These rocks many times have undergone such extreme deformations and transformations that it can be extremely difficult, to put it mildly, to figure out what was there to begin with. I've seen groups of rocks like that ones to which you referred that stubbornly defy analysis. This is probably why so many field geologists avoid studying metamorphic rocks. I love them even though they can be a royal pain to try to understand.
Metamorphic petrology was probably my favourite class through university of my university. For some reason the physical and chemical processes just seemed to make sense. Of course in the real world, things are never as cut and dried. We love to identify by protolith whenever possible. I think we've had 3 Ph.D's, a couple Master's and a raft of professional geologists pass through and make their opinions. Basically it comes down to: the rocks cannot be identified by the protolith. So we have been trying to use our geochemical data to attempt to discriminate the lithologies but with very limited success. We joked that the analysis was more voodoo witchcraft, but then that also summarizes geophysics.
__________________
Earth First! We'll mine the rest later.
Reply With Quote
  #805 (permalink)  
Old 03-November-2009, 04:18 PM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teddyv View Post


Metamorphic petrology was probably my favourite class through university of my university. For some reason the physical and chemical processes just seemed to make sense. Of course in the real world, things are never as cut and dried. We love to identify by protolith whenever possible. I think we've had 3 Ph.D's, a couple Master's and a raft of professional geologists pass through and make their opinions. Basically it comes down to: the rocks cannot be identified by the protolith. So we have been trying to use our geochemical data to attempt to discriminate the lithologies but with very limited success. We joked that the analysis was more voodoo witchcraft, but then that also summarizes geophysics.
LOL Indeed it does, teddy! Some still refer to radiometric dating, for example, as the "black art"! hehe
__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site

Last edited by EricFD; 03-November-2009 at 04:44 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #806 (permalink)  
Old 03-November-2009, 04:59 PM
geonuc's Avatar
geonuc geonuc is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teddyv View Post
Metamorphic rocks are probably my favourite group as well. There are just more interesting minerals in the assemblages. Although a current project we are working on has some of the nastiest group of rocks as far as identification we've come across. There is something like 3 or 4 deformation phases and 3 alteration events. We think the protolith is mostly volcanic with some sediments, but nobody can really tell for sure.
My geology summer field class mapped an area that had undergone a series of events - folding, faulting and igneous intrusion with accompanying contact metamorphism. It was a bear to work it all out.
Reply With Quote
Old 04-November-2009, 04:57 PM
teddyv
This message has been deleted by teddyv. Reason: image tag problems-arrgh
  #807 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2009, 04:58 PM
BigDon's Avatar
BigDon BigDon is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 5,846
Default

Hi guys, I hope nobody minds yet another meta-discussion, but I have a hydrology question I'd like to put to the experts.

A long time ago I studied hard to get good at raising tropical fish, eventually becoming a master fish breeder, (though woefully out of date nowadays).

Now the majority of your spectacular freshwater species come from soft acidic waters such as those found in the Amazon basin and tropical rivers world wide. And the reason the waters of the Amazon were so soft, or so I read, was since the area had been a rain forest for the last 33 to 27 million years, all the carbonates and such had been washed out already.

Well lately, thirty years later, I've been thinking this was a gross over-simplification of the issue and have been trying to deepen my understanding of it. I started to suspect this was the case when I saw a documentary on caving in Borneo/Indonesia, who rainforests are some of the oldest in the world at 110 million years old and they still have plenty of limestone. AND their rivers are soft and acidic as well.

I wonder, and am beginning to suspect, if it's:

A) Just the volume of water from the rain keeping the concentrations low.

B) The huge biomass of plant life sucking the soluble minerals out of the solution.

C) At least in the case of the Amazon, there wasn't a lot of carbonates to begin with.

D) all the above.

I know the low pH is due to both the solubility of the CO2 into the rain AND the peats and tannins from the jungle soils. My cardinal tetras would all start spawning when I dropped the pH to just under 6, using de-ionized water and tannins. (In the wild they will spawn in waters with a pH as low as 4.5. Protects their eggs from bacteria and fungus.)
__________________
In your rush to call everyone "entrenched" or closed-minded or "limited" you fail to note that the "limit" here has a very natural boundary: that point at which the evidence stops. - JayUtah

Science fiction was never meant to be an educational tool. - Editor Amazing Tales
Reply With Quote
  #808 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2009, 10:16 PM
cran's Avatar
cran cran is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Goomalling, Western Australia
Posts: 1,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDon View Post
Hi guys, I hope nobody minds yet another meta-discussion, but I have a hydrology question I'd like to put to the experts.

A long time ago I studied hard to get good at raising tropical fish, eventually becoming a master fish breeder, (though woefully out of date nowadays).

Now the majority of your spectacular freshwater species come from soft acidic waters such as those found in the Amazon basin and tropical rivers world wide. And the reason the waters of the Amazon were so soft, or so I read, was since the area had been a rain forest for the last 33 to 27 million years, all the carbonates and such had been washed out already.
I think you were misinformed there, BD -
as at the turn of the millennium (when I was looking at a similar question):

a) The Amazon discharges 7245 x 1012 L/yr @ 20 mg/L DIC (Dissolved Inorganic Carbon) >> 1.45 x 1014 g/yr, or ~ 36.34% of the world riverine total discharge of DIC

b) The Yangtse discharges 1063 x 1012 L/yr @ 148 mg/L DIC (Dissolved Inorganic Carbon) >> 1.57 x 1014 g/yr, or ~ 40.26% of the world riverine total discharge of DIC

c) These two rivers therefore represent more than 3/4 of the world total DIC riverine discharge ...

(source - assignment paper, Flinders University)


Quote:
Well lately, thirty years later, I've been thinking this was a gross over-simplification of the issue and have been trying to deepen my understanding of it. I started to suspect this was the case when I saw a documentary on caving in Borneo/Indonesia, who rainforests are some of the oldest in the world at 110 million years old and they still have plenty of limestone. AND their rivers are soft and acidic as well.

I wonder, and am beginning to suspect, if it's:

A) Just the volume of water from the rain keeping the concentrations low.

B) The huge biomass of plant life sucking the soluble minerals out of the solution.

C) At least in the case of the Amazon, there wasn't a lot of carbonates to begin with.

D) all the above.

I know the low pH is due to both the solubility of the CO2 into the rain AND the peats and tannins from the jungle soils. My cardinal tetras would all start spawning when I dropped the pH to just under 6, using de-ionized water and tannins. (In the wild they will spawn in waters with a pH as low as 4.5. Protects their eggs from bacteria and fungus.)
D) ... or even E) all of the above, plus other factors ...

such as the alkali-acid balance of the TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) of the discharge waters -

The two rivers also transport similar masses of calcium and magnesium. The Yangtse shifts 1.5x the mass of sulfate compared to the Amazon, but the Amazon moves 2.5x the mass of sodium, 1.9x the chlorine, 4.67x potassium, and 8.69x silica. Clearly, these two rivers are draining and eroding very different geological landscapes.
(source - assignment paper, Flinders University)
__________________
Quote:
"I don't know...I'm making it up as I go!" ...Dr I. Jones

"...and your wise men don't know how it fee-e-e-eels...
to be thick as a brick..." J. Tull

"Nature abhors perfection... cats abhor a vacuum!"

Reply With Quote
  #809 (permalink)  
Old 12-November-2009, 03:36 PM
jlhredshift's Avatar
jlhredshift jlhredshift is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Madison, Ohio
Posts: 1,701
Default

We just returned from a weekend in New York City and we visited the American Museum of Natural History. In the main entrance are a set of columns that are just magnificent.



This is a closeup and here is the link to Flickr where it can be enlarged substantially.

I am going to call it marble, with reservations, and the geologic history of its formation is obviously complicated. I have purposely not researched it.

The amount of different rocks that are on display being used as building material is unending as one wanders the canyons of New York City. In Central Park there are exposures of Manhattan Schist wherein you can see stratification and in one instance I saw an unconformable contact of feldspathic white and pink granite with the schist, being used as a curb material. At night driving by the exposures of the schist it would glisten with reflections of light off of the crystals contained in the schist.
__________________
(By the way, I hate it that so many papers in the areas of planetary science and geology are not easily available to the dreaded "non-subscribers". It is like they are screaming at me: "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH". Good, I feel better now.)

"Quaerendo inventis"
Reply With Quote
  #810 (permalink)  
Old 12-November-2009, 03:52 PM
teddyv's Avatar
teddyv teddyv is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New West, BC
Posts: 601
Default

I got to say that it looks almost fake (or at least not natural). The distribution of the larger fragments just looks to regular.
__________________
Earth First! We'll mine the rest later.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MOND - a general discussion Nereid Against the Mainstream 242 18-October-2006 02:06 PM
Discussion of Gulf Breeze UFO Case/Ed Walters Gorgonian Against the Mainstream 5 03-June-2006 10:09 AM
Forum for discussion of website design? Jeff Root Off-Topic Babbling 4 31-May-2006 04:50 PM
The discussion is spreading like an octopus's hand suntrack2 Universe Today Website Feedback 10 25-May-2006 10:58 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today