Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Science and Technology
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-July-2009, 01:07 PM
lostgalaxy's Avatar
lostgalaxy lostgalaxy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Default The toughest structure in nature

Hi,

What is the hardest thing to crack? Is it true that the more simple the composition, the more compact the object is.

So Cl2 is more durable than KCl? And diamond is tough because it's made of carbon molecule only.

Applying this to heavenly bodies, is star binary system the most durable? How rare is the case when two stars are of the same size?

I'm sorry I'm asking too much but I need these info for my study into human relationship. I guess it's just the same thing. Thanks.

LG
__________________
Don't search. Be found.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-July-2009, 01:29 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 9,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostgalaxy View Post
...Is it true that the more simple the composition, the more compact the object is.

So Cl2 is more durable than KCl? And diamond is tough because it's made of carbon molecule only....
No; There are many factors, but the method of molecular bonding is probably most important.
Graphite is made of carbon only too, and it's much less dense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostgalaxy View Post
Applying this to heavenly bodies, is star binary system the most durable?
What do you mean by durable? Longevity? stability? Density?
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-July-2009, 03:04 PM
Stroller Stroller is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 827
Default

The co-valent bond vs the co-habiting blonde

Discuss
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-July-2009, 03:43 PM
lostgalaxy's Avatar
lostgalaxy lostgalaxy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post

What do you mean by durable? Longevity? stability? Density?
Thanks NEOWatcher. I mean it's hard to break. So it's a combo longevity and stability.
__________________
Don't search. Be found.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-July-2009, 03:46 PM
lostgalaxy's Avatar
lostgalaxy lostgalaxy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stroller View Post
The co-valent bond vs the co-habiting blonde

Discuss
Thanks Stroller for reminding me of this shared electron thing. And a lovely pun that is!
__________________
Don't search. Be found.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-July-2009, 05:00 PM
PraedSt's Avatar
PraedSt PraedSt is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stroller View Post
The co-valent bond vs the co-habiting blonde
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-July-2009, 06:20 PM
Stroller Stroller is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 827
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostgalaxy View Post
Thanks Stroller for reminding me of this shared electron thing.
Yes, but nowhere near as tough as maintaining a permanent close relationship with Marilyn Monroe.

The Ionic Bond with the Iconic Blonde

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-July-2009, 07:10 PM
Ara Pacis's Avatar
Ara Pacis Ara Pacis is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: between the candle and the star.
Posts: 4,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostgalaxy View Post
Hi,

What is the hardest thing to crack? Is it true that the more simple the composition, the more compact the object is.

So Cl2 is more durable than KCl? And diamond is tough because it's made of carbon molecule only.

Applying this to heavenly bodies, is star binary system the most durable? How rare is the case when two stars are of the same size?

I'm sorry I'm asking too much but I need these info for my study into human relationship. I guess it's just the same thing. Thanks.

LG
Are you referring to hardness, tensile strength, compressive strength, bending, impact brittleness?

Are you trying to find scientific analogues to support or oppose homogeniety or heterogeneity and bonding?
__________________
"What you think you thought you saw you did not see." Agent J, MiB - Manhatten Bureau
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-July-2009, 08:20 PM
novaderrik's Avatar
novaderrik novaderrik is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Henning, MN, USA
Posts: 3,544
Default

the 307 that was in my cousin's 1971 Chevy Chevelle was made out of some pretty indestructible stuff- even with no oil or coolant and a couple of pounds of sand dumped into it, it still refused to break.
i think it was made out of "Sterner Stuff".
__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion
The.. Best.. Thread..Ever...

Last edited by novaderrik; 06-July-2009 at 08:25 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-July-2009, 03:43 AM
Jens's Avatar
Jens Jens is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 3,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostgalaxy View Post
Applying this to heavenly bodies, is star binary system the most durable? How rare is the case when two stars are of the same size?

I'm sorry I'm asking too much but I need these info for my study into human relationship. I guess it's just the same thing. Thanks.
Honestly, I don't think the analogies are valid. What makes a material strong is not really related at all to human relationships. Making people stand in a hexagon pattern rather than a square one is not going to do anything for their human relations.
__________________
As above, so below
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-July-2009, 06:27 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 9,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jens View Post
Making people stand in a hexagon pattern rather than a square one is not going to do anything for their human relations.
Hey, man... dem squares aint cool, they weak...
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-July-2009, 04:23 AM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 17,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ara Pacis View Post
Are you referring to hardness, tensile strength, compressive strength, bending, impact brittleness?

Are you trying to find scientific analogues to support or oppose homogeniety or heterogeneity and bonding?
And are you referring to a bulk, solid material (in which case the properties Ara Pacis mentioned are the critical thing) or are you talking about breaking a single chemical bond. A single sodium chloride molecule may be hard to "break" (split into two atoms because of the strength of the chemical bond), but a large single crystal of sodium chloride is relatively weak mechanically.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-July-2009, 12:38 PM
clop's Avatar
clop clop is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 1,004
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostgalaxy View Post
Hi,

What is the hardest thing to crack? Is it true that the more simple the composition, the more compact the object is.

So Cl2 is more durable than KCl? And diamond is tough because it's made of carbon molecule only.

Applying this to heavenly bodies, is star binary system the most durable? How rare is the case when two stars are of the same size?

I'm sorry I'm asking too much but I need these info for my study into human relationship. I guess it's just the same thing. Thanks.

LG
When I studied metallurgy twenty years ago I learned about the crystalline structure of metals and their relative strengths.

From what I remember, the strongest metal of all would be one where the atoms were arranged in a perfect lattice, with no "fault lines", and no contamination by other substances (which create "fault lines").

If you could purify a metal 100%, and have a perfectly regular matrix of atoms, you would have the strongest form of that metal.

Unfortunately it is virtually impossible to purify a metal to the point where there are no contaminants present, i.e. no fault lines.

One single fault line will render a piece of metal extremely brittle.

But in general practice, where it is impossible to eradicate all fault lines, it turns out that the strongest metals are those that contain many fault lines. A material is much stronger when it has a huge number of fault lines interlocking in three dimensions than when it has, say, one single fault line.

It seems illogical, but that's what I was taught.

clop
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-July-2009, 02:55 PM
Dgennero's Avatar
Dgennero Dgennero is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Key West, Florida
Posts: 403
Default

I think, "the hardest thing to crack" and at the same time the most stable thing as for longevity is a Neutron Star. I don't count black holes as matter as we know it. Try to scratch something from a N.S.'s surface or split it in two. Any approach with anything will result in that thing to become part of the N.S.
And it will be a long, long time until all those Neutrons will have decayed.
__________________
Mars Society.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2009, 04:22 AM
lostgalaxy's Avatar
lostgalaxy lostgalaxy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Default

Thanks Swift and all,

I've got really interesting stuffs here. Especially clop's "purism" and Dgennero's "neutralism".

It's known that in the end everything collapses. Every bondage breaks. Still one wants to know what's the next best to deathlessness.
__________________
Don't search. Be found.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-July-2009, 10:28 AM
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 12,607
Default

I'd have to say it's degenerate matter, which, with preon degeneracy, is seriously more dense (and tough) than neutron degeneracy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Greater than the speed of light Dennis schaffert Against the Mainstream 128 10-July-2009 03:49 AM
The Nature of a Falsehood Bill Thmpson Conspiracy Theories 31 05-July-2009 09:32 PM
Mechanism from nature for breaking supersymmetry of E8 in Lisi's TOE chriscurtis Science and Technology 19 15-September-2008 05:04 AM
Nature: 1. Mankind: All Wet mugaliens Off-Topic Babbling 21 22-June-2008 10:16 PM
The reality problem heusdens Against the Mainstream 3 23-October-2002 10:16 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today