|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I read the following and instantly thought of you.
LINK (subscription required) Pentagon's New Goal: Put Science Into Scripts By DAVID M. HALBFINGER August 4, 2005 LOS ANGELES, Aug. 3 - Tucked away in the Hollywood hills, an elite group of scientists from across the country and from a grab bag of disciplines - rocket science, nanotechnology, genetics, even veterinary medicine - has gathered this week to plot a solution to what officials call one of the nation's most vexing long-term national security problems. Their work is being financed by the Air Force and the Army, but the Manhattan Project it ain't: the 15 scientists are being taught how to write and sell screenplays. ~~ Edward Herman Copyrighted material deleted by The Bad Astronomer |
|
||||
|
Seems to me the Pentagon and the movie studios should be contacting a couple of guys who have demonstrated quite successfully that they know how to promote science via the media:
Phil Plait and Jay Windley!
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Hmm, your tax dollars at work. Considering all the threats to national security they want to ensure movies have better science pedigrees? OK, to be fair I assume they are referring to brain-drain and the dumbification of america. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for science accurate screenplays, but why should the government get into the business? It doesn't matter if the science is accurate or really bad, the movie will only be popular if it is well written and features characters that movie-goers will like. Instead of just teaching scientists to write they should also pay for remedial science education for aspiring screenwriters. After all, if the story is bad no one will stick around to learn from the science.
__________________
"What you think you thought you saw you did not see." Agent J, MiB - Manhatten Bureau |
|
||||
|
The government should be in the business of exciting the public, especially kids, about learning. That should be a very big goal of the government!
Encouraging scientists to get involved with films is a pretty good way to do this, and costs very little. Mind you, a company (cannot remember which) decided not to build a plant in the US because, for one, they felt the citizenry was too poorly educated. They built the plant in Canada instead. That speaks volumes about this country, and what we need to do.
__________________
Phil Plait The Bad Astronomer http://www.badastronomy.com badastro@badastronomy.com |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Sunset Die Sonne scheidet hinter dem Gebirge. In alle Täler steigt der Abend nieder mit seinen Schatten, die voll Kühlung sind. |
|
||||
|
I'm an up-and-coming filmmaker, and I've been tossing around ideas for movies.
__________________
You have a grandstand seat to one of the greatest on most momentous occasions in the history of science |
|
|||
|
How about movie diplomatics? Have Airport 2007 with the villain trying to ram an A-380 into the Petronas towers and the hero being a woman detective from an Islamic nation. A good role model in an action adventure movie--with Tony Shaloub as her bumbling husband?
A documentary on the Halifax and Texas City explosions to keep us aware of port security. |