Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Small Media at Large
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2005, 02:13 PM
banquo's_bumble_puppy's Avatar
banquo's_bumble_puppy banquo's_bumble_puppy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alpha III
Posts: 1,944
Default Star Trek: TNG Season 1

I have been watching the early episodes of TNG and I noticed that they seemed to take risks with some things that are lacking in the later seasons. Anyone notice the male crew members wearing skirts? Also, the whole male/female dynamic seems to be subtly different from what came later. Anyone else find this enjoyable?
__________________
The world breaks everyone and afterward many are strong in the broken places. ~ Ernest Hemingway ...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2005, 02:16 PM
Moose's Avatar
Moose Moose is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Maritimes
Posts: 7,280
Send a message via MSN to Moose
Default

Gene's contribution. I prefer third season onward.
__________________
[Dr. Horrible]___________________________[Penny]
Listen close to everybody's heart________And you believe there's good in everybody's heart
And hear that breaking sound_____________Keep it safe and sound
Hopes and dreams are shattering apart____With hope you can do your part
And crashing to the ground_______________To turn a life around
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2005, 03:25 PM
AstroSmurf's Avatar
AstroSmurf AstroSmurf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,031
Send a message via ICQ to AstroSmurf
Default

Hmm, interesting. I'll keep it in mind as me and the SO are watching through the 1st season right now.
__________________
"We do not require reality to conform to the expectations of the ignorant"
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2005, 06:17 PM
peter eldergill peter eldergill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,483
Default

I look back now and think the first season stuff was pretty bad overall...probably the actors not knowing their characters very well I suppose

Pete
__________________
PJE

There's so much I don't know about astrophysics. I wish I had read that book by that wheelchair guy.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2005, 06:32 PM
parallaxicality's Avatar
parallaxicality parallaxicality is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,167
Default

I don't know whether to hate or adore the first season of TNG. Much of what was produced was pure drivel (The Last Outpost is one of the most unendurable hours I can never have back; Code of Honor was so overtly racist I don't think I've ever seen it repeated on television; The Naked Now was so bad I can't even look back on it without wincing; Tasha's death in "Skin of Evil" was so pointless the writers spent the next five years apologising for it by spinning it off into some classic episodes like "The Measure of a Man," "Yesterday's Enterprise" and "Legacy") but you're right; along with the drivel there were a number of idiosyncratic and risky episodes, such as "Where No One Has Gone Before" and "We'll Always Have Paris", that Star Trek subsequently never had the guts to develop. However, there were a number of episodes that, while not being particulalry bad, were very disappointing, the biggest example being "Hide and Q", "The Big Goodbye," and "Heart of Glory", all of which were brimming with some fascinating ideas, good enough to sustain many of the show's ongoing arcs for years to come, but which were uniformly all clunkers in the writing and acting departments. The actors, particularly Denise Crosby and Jonathan Frakes, felt wooden and awkward, not yet into their roles.
__________________
I think fish is nice, but then I think that rain is wet, so who am I to judge?

It's gotten to the point where careful investigation is needed just to tell parody from reality. I think that means reality is broken.- Noclevername.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2005, 06:39 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,595
Default

now, now--Tasha's death wasn't the writers' fault. Denise Crosby just learned her lesson early: you can't escape Star Trek, even if you die in the first season. (also, never quit a successful TV show to have a movie career.)
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2005, 09:46 PM
vonmazur's Avatar
vonmazur vonmazur is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 589
Default

The only episode worth watching twice was, "The Inner Light".....(IMHO) The rest of them were barely tolerable, or just annoying, as has been pointed out above...

I think that Roddenberry had a fetish for androgynous youths in white robes, and his anti-smoking hang up was also apparent, I cannot blame him for all the "crappe" on STTNG, but he holds the bag for STTOS, and all the duplication and copouts that plagued the original series. I do not know who to blame for the Next Gen and all the awful shows in the first year....In spite of the gawdawful writing and the annoying use of "Deus ex Machinae" (more than once a decade), it was better than watching the other pluperfect mind rotting crapola that was being shown at the time....

Dale in Ala
__________________
"Ad astra per aspera"
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2005, 10:55 PM
Charly's Avatar
Charly Charly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Surrey
Posts: 264
Default

Roddenberry lost it.

He was booted off and TNG suddenly became watchable.

He was also removed from the feature films, and suddenly, they too became watchable.

Just cause you have one great idea, doesnt mean you have more than that one great idea.

What he did do was provide inspiration in others.
__________________
"Oh, you'd be surprised at the things you can learn when you're doing alterations."
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2005, 11:03 PM
Moose's Avatar
Moose Moose is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Maritimes
Posts: 7,280
Send a message via MSN to Moose
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charly
He was booted off and TNG suddenly became watchable.

He was also removed from the feature films, and suddenly, they too became watchable.
Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but I was under the impression he was removed from the show/movies by virtue of the fact he was dead (Jim)?

[Edit:] No, I'm mistaken. I just checked the dates with IMDB, and he passed away somewhere between seasons four and five. Neat. So he was ditched then.
__________________
[Dr. Horrible]___________________________[Penny]
Listen close to everybody's heart________And you believe there's good in everybody's heart
And hear that breaking sound_____________Keep it safe and sound
Hopes and dreams are shattering apart____With hope you can do your part
And crashing to the ground_______________To turn a life around
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2005, 11:51 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,251
Default

One of the problems was that he took the "Hopeful future" idea too far. Part of the appeal for the original Star Trek was that it wasn't a vision of a dark future - all too common in those days. Rather, it was one where they had problems, but generally things were far better than they are today.

Given that this new show was about "The Next Generation," it had to be even better, where problems were often intellectual. Unfortunately, utopia is boring.

There were a few early shows I found interesting. I liked "Where No One Has gone Before" because they were doing something different. Unfortunately, they didn't really do much with the story. "11001001" also was interesting, with the discussion of sentient computers, but again, it didn't go anywhere. But "The Arsenal Of Freedom" was a perfect example of how to do things wrong: They finally get some serious battle action, then break the tension by sitting down to discuss "feelings." Urrggh.

When they started realizing that they needed a bit of action and drama, the stories improved - somewhat.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-October-2005, 12:49 AM
James_Digriz's Avatar
James_Digriz James_Digriz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Colorado, lost on LV426
Posts: 449
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn
Given that this new show was about "The Next Generation," it had to be even better, where problems were often intellectual. Unfortunately, utopia is boring.
Ah. Nicholas Van Rijn. Great series by Poul Anderson if that's what you intended as you nickname.

Your right but I still liked The Next Generation. I was able to let everything slide except Couselor Troi.

"No Captain. Don't fire Phasers. We need to talk about your feelings."

Yeah right.

Thats what made DS9 so great. Much darker. The Dominion War arc was fantastic. And while Babylon 5 was on at the same time it was Sci-Fi fan heaven. Remember they both came out with a one eyed character?
__________________
Why did the cat fall off the roof?
Because he lost his mu.

I just destroyed the periodic table. I only recognize the element of surprise.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-October-2005, 01:18 AM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James_Digriz
Ah. Nicholas Van Rijn. Great series by Poul Anderson if that's what you intended as you nickname.
Yes, that's it. Poul Anderson was one of my favorite authors.

Quote:
Thats what made DS9 so great. Much darker. The Dominion War arc was fantastic. And while Babylon 5 was on at the same time it was Sci-Fi fan heaven. Remember they both came out with a one eyed character?
This is unacceptable! You have to give me something to argue ... er... disagree with.

Of the recent Star Trek series, DS9 was my favorite, and B5 was fantastic. There was quite a bit to like on TNG, but it didn't start getting really interesting until they got out of the "future utopia" mindset. The last year or so of TNG had some pretty terrible episodes though.

Anyway, having a rat problem? I'd suggest some steel traps.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-October-2005, 01:59 AM
AKONI AKONI is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter eldergill
I look back now and think the first season stuff was pretty bad overall...probably the actors not knowing their characters very well I suppose

Pete
I agree. I always thought the acting was very stiff in the first season, and as time went on they portrayed their roles brilliantly.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-October-2005, 02:41 AM
James_Digriz's Avatar
James_Digriz James_Digriz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Colorado, lost on LV426
Posts: 449
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn
Of the recent Star Trek series, DS9 was my favorite, and B5 was fantastic. There was quite a bit to like on TNG, but it didn't start getting really interesting until they got out of the "future utopia" mindset. The last year or so of TNG had some pretty terrible episodes though.

Anyway, having a rat problem? I'd suggest some steel traps.
Yep. DS9 is the best in my opinion as well. They really had some gut wrenching episodes. Like the one where Kira finds out her mother was Ducat's mistress or that one where that Cardassian changes his face to look like a war criminal and gets shot in the end. And the best of course: "The Visitor" with Tony Todd. Then there's the two times they burned Jadzia in love affairs. I mean cmon. Next Gen has nothing like "The House of Quark."

Yes. The Stainless Steel variety. Another great series although the first four are the best.
__________________
Why did the cat fall off the roof?
Because he lost his mu.

I just destroyed the periodic table. I only recognize the element of surprise.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-October-2005, 07:11 AM
parallaxicality's Avatar
parallaxicality parallaxicality is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,167
Default

I hear a Stainless Steel Rat movie is finally in the offing.

DS9 was fantastic overall; it was remarkably consistent, even in its first season. I didn't really like the way they ended the Dominion War; it was a bit too convenient- the "nice" Federation gets to pat itself on the back for saving the Founders from genocide committed by the "nasty" Federation. But the fact remains, without that attempt of genocide the Federation would never have won the war.

Babylon 5 was OK. I was never too into it; it was too anthropocentric. It coudn't seem to make up its mind as to whether it was about the history of humans interacting with aliens or whether it was a grand galactic history in which humans only took part. The sudden shift from the multicultural epic of the Shadow War to the parochial crisis of Morgan Clark was not a good move, in my opinion.

Quote:
Yes, that's it. Poul Anderson was one of my favorite authors.
And there I was thinking you'd named yourself after Rembrandt.
__________________
I think fish is nice, but then I think that rain is wet, so who am I to judge?

It's gotten to the point where careful investigation is needed just to tell parody from reality. I think that means reality is broken.- Noclevername.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2005, 09:18 PM
hippietrekx's Avatar
hippietrekx hippietrekx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AKONI
I agree. I always thought the acting was very stiff in the first season, and as time went on they portrayed their roles brilliantly.
I agree for most of the characters on this one, except for Data. Brent Spiner seemed to have stepped into the role great, but after season four or five it was almost like he was trying too hard...

--hippie
__________________
Visit Mutated Genes, my X-men fanart site.

I heart Ducky. I stalk Ducky. His hair is quite fluffy, and he makes good cookies. (And now he's my prom date...)
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 13-October-2005, 01:35 AM
nomuse nomuse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 1,385
Send a message via AIM to nomuse
Default

Reacting to banquo's opening post, Next Gen first lost my respect in one queasy little scene in which Deanna and Beverly are asked by an outsider why they wear make-up. "No-one forces us to," they assure this person, "we just like to." Un huh. And I wear high heels because of the beneficial effects on my tendons and joints.

Reacting to later posts, yah, the first season was really stumbling to define the characters. I don't think Jonathan Frakes really had a handle on Riker until he grew that beard. It took them a while to grow that ensemble. At that, though, they quite outdistanced Voyager -- Voyager finally gave up on actually trying to deal with ensemble dynamics, and resigned itself to doing a B'lanna story, a Seven of Nine story, another Seven of Nine story...
__________________
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 14-October-2005, 12:11 PM
Jason Thompson Jason Thompson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 917
Default

DS9 was fantastic overall; it was remarkably consistent, even in its first season. I didn't really like the way they ended the Dominion War; it was a bit too convenient- the "nice" Federation gets to pat itself on the back for saving the Founders from genocide committed by the "nasty" Federation. But the fact remains, without that attempt of genocide the Federation would never have won the war.

I don't see that at all. The Founders were dying, but there was only one in the Alpha Quadrant (excluding Odo). The problems the Dominion had that led to the loss of the War had more to do with the Prophets' blocking their ships from entering from the Gamma Quadrant, so they were limited to what they could make in the Alpha Quadrant, and from the Cardassian uprising that was threatening their headquarters and facilities in the Alpha Quadrant. The sickness and the cure allowed the federation Alliance to win without much more catastrophic loss of life, since it convinced the Female Changeling to surrender rather than allow the Jem'hadar to fight to the last, but the outcome was certain defeat for the Dominion before then.

However, the final arc was far from perfect. Extreme Measures is one of the worst episodes of the entire 7 years, and a serious case of the good guys winning because the bad guys turn into complete idiots. If Section 31 was so good at hiding themselves, why send the only operative Bashir already knows and have him visit Bashir's quarters first?!

I would have liked to have seen the cure given to the Founders by the Federation, or at least one of the Defiant crew, rather than Odo. That would have made a nice first-hand demonstration to the Founders of the good will of at least some humanoids.
__________________
"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views." The Doctor, Doctor Who: The Face of Evil.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:56 PM.