Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Small Media at Large
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2005, 04:24 PM
banquo's_bumble_puppy's Avatar
banquo's_bumble_puppy banquo's_bumble_puppy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alpha III
Posts: 1,938
Default Star Trek- TOS- would you watch it with modernized sfx?

Someone has previously proposed to re-do, (cgi) the sfx for the original Star Trek series. Would you watch it? Would it enhance anything?
__________________
The world breaks everyone and afterward many are strong in the broken places. ~ Ernest Hemingway ...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2005, 04:38 PM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,052
Default

That would be like beefing up old Godzilla movies with modern CGI. Part of the atmosphere and fun of these movies were the cheesy sfx.
Many super-smooth-sfx-movies proved, that sfx is not the thing that makes a good movie a good movie
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2005, 06:02 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,214
Default

I don't recall that many grit-your-teeth SFX on TOS, but then I was practically weaned on it, so I'm not remotely objective. I'm inclined to think that 21st-century special effects would be rather jarring when combined with 60's-era sets and costumes.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2005, 08:23 PM
Donnie B.'s Avatar
Donnie B. Donnie B. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,223
Default

I suppose it depends on how well it was done. Surely the spacecraft exteriors would look better with modern CGI, but as ToSeek says, you'd still have the very retro-looking control panels and equipment. It would be pretty tough to CGI all that.

But some of the "moments" that grabbed me in the TOS could stand updating. For example, when the alien ship in "The Corbomite Maneuver" approaches, dwarfing the Enterprise, I was blown away. Now it looks a bit cheesy. I wouldn't mind seeing that (and a few other scenes like it) replaced with high-quality modern equivalents.

D'you suppose they could CGI-it out to widescreen format? (Donnie B. is enjoying his new 16:9 capability.)

(Donnie B. is also wondering when CGI became a verb.)
__________________
Bring back Firefly!

"It is quite clear that Occam's razor does not sharpen in your pyramid." (Nicolas)

"Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest." (Paul Simon)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2005, 09:09 PM
hippietrekx's Avatar
hippietrekx hippietrekx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 412
Default

If the storylines and subliminal jokes are kept the same, I'd watch TOS if it were re-created with sock-puppets!

--hippie
__________________
Visit Mutated Genes, my X-men fanart site.

I heart Ducky. I stalk Ducky. His hair is quite fluffy, and he makes good cookies. (And now he's my prom date...)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-October-2005, 12:49 AM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,574
Default

would it still have Kirk? yes? then no.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-October-2005, 02:51 AM
Metricyard Metricyard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 956
Default

Are we taking lessons from George Lucas now?
Did the original Star Wars get better because Lucas added more and updated CGI?. No, it added nothing to it, and in some places made it worse.

And to even think of doing this to the TOS is sacrelidge!! What would the late Scotty say to this? "Captain, the engines can't any more of this CGI"
__________________
"The universe is driven by the complex interaction between three ingredients: matter, energy, and enlightened self-interest." - G'Kar
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-October-2005, 03:15 AM
Charly's Avatar
Charly Charly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Surrey
Posts: 264
Default

Lets facce it, it hasnt aged well.

The acting, effects and stories are all quite poor compared to what you would watch these days.

A remake wouldnt work either, as it has bascially been done (TNG).

Would like to see Blakes 7 get the treatment though.
__________________
"Oh, you'd be surprised at the things you can learn when you're doing alterations."
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-October-2005, 09:20 AM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,008
Default

What you all fail to recognise is it's not about CGI, it's not even about SCI-FI.

The Spaceship is just a way of putting the characters into the storyline.

What's wrong with the acting and the stories? they are way ahead of anything I have seen in the last 20 years.
__________________
'The eye can only see what the mind is prepared to accept'
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-October-2005, 10:43 AM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charly
Lets facce it, it hasnt aged well.

The acting, effects and stories are all quite poor compared to what you would watch these days.
The special effects are poor by today's standards, sure. But acting and stories? In your opinion, not mine.


Quote:
A remake wouldnt work either, as it has bascially been done (TNG).

Would like to see Blakes 7 get the treatment though.
Heh. I always get a laugh out of comments like that. Star Trek and Blake's Seven were both great shows. Blake's Seven borrowed a lot from Star Trek. They are hard to compare, because they had very different stories. But if you forced me to do so, I would have to rank Star Trek above Blake's Seven. Aren't opinions great?

As for CGI in Star Trek: It would be fun to see "Doomsday Machine" with CGI. There's are few other episodes that would be fun to see with modern CGI, as long as the original versions were still available. I absolutely don't want to see different actors doing the same stories. It would be horrible to see somebody try to take the place of Scotty, Kirk, Spock, McCoy ...
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-October-2005, 11:13 AM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,081
Default

The relationship between Kirk, Spock, and McCoy...that is the reason that Star Trek worked as far as I'm concerned. Recent attempts to duplicate that relationship have failed to live up to the original, IMO.

As far as "updating" the FX with CGI...what would be the "point". I like the original FX. I wouldn't mind if the "bleedthrough" (stars showing through spaceships) and the "matte outlines" were cleaned up a bit. But other than those particulars, I really see no need to "fix" something that isn't broken.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-October-2005, 01:26 PM
Pip's Avatar
Pip Pip is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Longview, WA
Posts: 72
Default

Yes. But I'd prefer Star Trek: Animated Adventures with modernized animations. The original ones were so crappy, it really hindered the show.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-October-2005, 04:39 PM
Donnie B.'s Avatar
Donnie B. Donnie B. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,223
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pip
Yes. But I'd prefer Star Trek: Animated Adventures with modernized animations. The original ones were so crappy, it really hindered the show.
Definitely. And some of them were really good stories, too! I'm thinking of one that adapted one of Larry Niven's Kzinti stories into the Trek universe.
__________________
Bring back Firefly!

"It is quite clear that Occam's razor does not sharpen in your pyramid." (Nicolas)

"Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest." (Paul Simon)
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-October-2005, 04:55 PM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banquo's_bumble_puppy
Someone has previously proposed to re-do, (cgi) the sfx for the original Star Trek series. Would you watch it? Would it enhance anything?
I don't think that would add much to the show. Star Trek -- TOS is a classic and always will be. SF connaisseurs know that older classics are often lacking in the SFX department, but that it would be unfair to judge them by the standards of today. In any case, IMO, the strong point of Star Trek were always the ideas and situations, not the setting.

Now, the original Battlestar Galactica might be a different story...
__________________
"All your bias are belong to us." Ara Pacis
"A witty saying proves nothing." Voltaire
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-October-2005, 04:57 PM
Gullible Jones's Avatar
Gullible Jones Gullible Jones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,032
Default

Nope, I wouldn't. I'd only watch it with modernized plots and accurate science... But then it wouldn't be Star Trek.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-October-2005, 07:40 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 11,371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F.
As far as updating the FX with CGI...what would be the point. I like the original FX. I wouldn't mind if the bleedthrough (stars showing through spaceships) and the matte outlines were cleaned up a bit. But other than those particulars, I really see no need to fixsomething that <i>isn't broken
I agree, is there someone out there who wouldn't watch TOS unless they updated the effects. People either love it the way it us, or they don't, no matter how spiffy it looks.As I've said before, why do we need to keep redoing Star Trek, there is a ton of good science fiction out there waiting to be made.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

Last edited by Swift; 10-October-2005 at 07:42 PM. Reason: clean up a bunch of formating gone wild
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-October-2005, 09:39 PM
Charly's Avatar
Charly Charly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Surrey
Posts: 264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn
The special effects are poor by today's standards, sure. But acting and stories? In your opinion, not mine.
Oh come on...... PLEEEEEASE!!!!

The acting...?

Even taking TNG and Ds9, the stories and acting are far superior.

But when you add in other genre examples, Farscape Firefly Battlestar (TNG) TOS is panto by comparison.

When you think of West Wing, 24, The Sopranos and The Shield, TOS looks like a preschool play.

And the storylines from TOS were fairly reminicent of the first two years of TNG, which initself were the worst 2 years of its run.

I can see you are passionate about the subject, though. So please feel free to tear apart my argument with a reasoned counter.
__________________
"Oh, you'd be surprised at the things you can learn when you're doing alterations."
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-October-2005, 09:56 PM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charly
Oh come on...... PLEEEEEASE!!!!

The acting...?

Even taking TNG and Ds9, the stories and acting are far superior.
Every once in a while, in Star Trek -- TOS, there were small bits of malicious humour between Spock, McCoy and Kirk that I've never seen in later incarnations of the show. I'd call that good acting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charly
And the storylines from TOS were fairly reminicent of the first two years of TNG, which initself were the worst 2 years of its run.

I can see you are passionate about the subject, though. So please feel free to tear apart my argument with a reasoned counter.
I see how you can be passionate about it, too, but I still think you've got something backwards in there.
__________________
"All your bias are belong to us." Ara Pacis
"A witty saying proves nothing." Voltaire
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10-October-2005, 10:36 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charly
Oh come on...... PLEEEEEASE!!!!

The acting...?

Even taking TNG and Ds9, the stories and acting are far superior.
In your opinion. That's fine, everyone has an opinion, but don't expect everyone to share yours. I'll note that the "even taking" suggests you don't think much of TNG and DS9 either.

Quote:
But when you add in other genre examples, Farscape Firefly Battlestar (TNG) TOS is panto by comparison.
I had to look up "panto" - apparently suggesting a children's show? Well, Farscape was a fantasy show with muppets. Firefly was a Western. Although I sometimes watched Farscape, the stories and the characters didn't impress me much. I couldn't get interested in Firefly enough to watch more than two or three episodes. Better than Star Trek? In my opinion, not even close.

I like the new BSG, but it is different from Star Trek. Different, but not better.

That is all in my opinion, of course. I don't care if you agree.

Quote:
When you think of West Wing, 24, The Sopranos and The Shield, TOS looks like a preschool play.
So now you are going outside the genre?

Quote:
I can see you are passionate about the subject, though. So please feel free to tear apart my argument with a reasoned counter.
What argument? That you don't like Star Trek? That's pretty obvious. You seem pretty passionate. My only "passion" is annoyance when people think everyone else should be expected to share their opinion.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 11-October-2005, 06:44 AM
nomuse nomuse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 1,385
Send a message via AIM to nomuse
Default

Maybe I think too much like someone who does theater for a living. But the joy of TOS for me is in the scripts, and the Kirk/Spock/McCoy ensemble, and the way they work like a well-oiled machine. No wasted parts, no excess lines or rambling sub-plots -- simple, economical story-telling.

When I think of TV I've seen since, only a few shows like Buffy, or SG-1, come up to that sort of graceful economy. Almost all the later generations of ST struggled to get a story out. Not to say there weren't good episodes of the later shows. Or bad episodes of TOS. And the depth of story and character explored in, say, Wiseguy really shows how much the hermetic 50-minute structure constrained the original Star Trek.

In any case, the SFX aren't an issue to me. With a few wincing exceptions they managed to avoid "look at me" syndrome, instead presenting the information needed then getting out of the way. I'll take that anytime over the long CGI extravaganzas that substitute for actual drama and conflict on the unlamented Enterprise.