Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Small Media at Large
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-October-2005, 07:53 AM
parallaxicality's Avatar
parallaxicality parallaxicality is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,166
Default Anyone else feel sorry for Katie Melua?

For those of you of a Leftpondian persuasion, Katie Melua is a British singer of Georgian (the country, not the state) extraction. Pretty in a dark way with a sweet, bubbly voice and a prediliction for slow, jazzy ballads with slightly odd lyrics. She's recently caused a minor astronomical firestorm in the UK by singing the following stanza in her recent single, "Nine Million Bicycles":

We are twelve billion light years from the edge,
That's a guess,
No-one can ever say it's true
But I know that I will always be with you.


Science writer Simon Singh fired back in The Guardian that he happened to KNOW with absolute certainty that the actual distance to the edge of the universe was exactly 13.7 billion light years, and to claim any other figure, or, God forbid, to claim it is a guess, is a slap in the face to all the astronomers who spent so many years working out Hubble's constant.

But then a second group of astronomers have apparently rushed to her defence, and though I don't have their exact quote, I imagine that they remind the general public that nothing is absolutely known in science.

It just seems so unfair. We don't hold our politicians to such a level of scientific scrutiny, why single out balladeers?
__________________
I think fish is nice, but then I think that rain is wet, so who am I to judge?

It's gotten to the point where careful investigation is needed just to tell parody from reality. I think that means reality is broken.- Noclevername.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-October-2005, 08:04 AM
Lianachan's Avatar
Lianachan Lianachan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: A' Ghàidhealtachd
Posts: 1,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parallaxicality
For those of you of a Leftpondian persuasion, Katie Melua is a British singer of Georgian (the country, not the state) extraction. Pretty in a dark way with a sweet, bubbly voice and a prediliction for slow, jazzy ballads with slightly odd lyrics. She's recently caused a minor astronomical firestorm in the UK by singing the following stanza in her recent single, "Nine Million Bicycles":

We are twelve billion light years from the edge,
That's a guess,
No-one can ever say it's true
But I know that I will always be with you.


Science writer Simon Singh fired back in The Guardian that he happened to KNOW with absolute certainty that the actual distance to the edge of the universe was exactly 13.7 billion light years, and to claim any other figure, or, God forbid, to claim it is a guess, is a slap in the face to all the astronomers who spent so many years working out Hubble's constant.

But then a second group of astronomers have apparently rushed to her defence, and though I don't have their exact quote, I imagine that they remind the general public that nothing is absolutely known in science.

It just seems so unfair. We don't hold our politicians to such a level of scientific scrutiny, why single out balladeers?
It's pedantry, of the very worst kind. It's just the lyrics to a song! I'd be surprised if the general public, or in fact anybody outside the astronomical community, gives the vaguest hoot about it. And those who do give the vaguest hoot about it ought to take a long, hard look at themselves.
__________________
I offer a complete and utter retraction. The imputation was totally without basis in fact, was in no way fair comment and was motivated purely by malice. I deeply regret any distress that my comments may have caused you or your family, and I hereby undertake not to repeat any such slander at any time in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-October-2005, 08:46 AM
ZaphodBeeblebrox's Avatar
ZaphodBeeblebrox ZaphodBeeblebrox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Henniker, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 4,598
Send a message via AIM to ZaphodBeeblebrox Send a message via Yahoo to ZaphodBeeblebrox
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lianachan
It's pedantry, of the very worst kind. It's just the lyrics to a song! I'd be surprised if the general public, or in fact anybody outside the astronomical community, gives the vaguest hoot about it. And those who do give the vaguest hoot about it ought to take a long, hard look at themselves.
Yeah ...

At Least, she's Trying ...

More than I Can Say, about Some People, anyway!

__________________
If you Ignore YOUR Rights, they Will go away.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-October-2005, 09:16 AM
Lianachan's Avatar
Lianachan Lianachan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: A' Ghàidhealtachd
Posts: 1,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZaphodBeeblebrox
Yeah ...

At Least, she's Trying ...

More than I Can Say, about Some People, anyway!

Those guys could have a field day with Monty Python's Galaxy Song.
__________________
I offer a complete and utter retraction. The imputation was totally without basis in fact, was in no way fair comment and was motivated purely by malice. I deeply regret any distress that my comments may have caused you or your family, and I hereby undertake not to repeat any such slander at any time in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-October-2005, 10:53 AM
Maha Vailo Maha Vailo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sunrise, FL
Posts: 1,020
Default

What's the fuss about? "13.7 million" wouldn't fit the rhythm.

- Maha "...that Georgia girls are always on astronomers' m-m-m-m-minds" Vailo
__________________
When you get down to it, Science answers how. Religion answers why. - hippietrekx
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-October-2005, 12:00 PM
Gas Giant Gas Giant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parallaxicality
Science writer Simon Singh fired back in The Guardian that he happened to KNOW with absolute certainty that the actual distance to the edge of the universe was exactly 13.7 billion light years, and to claim any other figure, or, God forbid, to claim it is a guess, is a slap in the face to all the astronomers who spent so many years working out Hubble's constant.
In his fervour to show his knowledge, he's got it wrong. It's 13.7 bn light years to the cosmic light horizon. The present distance to the edge of the observable universe is much greater, due to expansion. Current estimate is about 78 bn light years.

Maybe Katie should rewrite the first line of the stanza to read "We're eighty billion light years from the edge."
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-October-2005, 01:12 PM
jumbo's Avatar
jumbo jumbo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Posts: 627
Default

Well she could argue that she never said to the edge of what. So until she does people cant say shes wrong i guess.
Id say she at least deserves credit for using light years as unit of distance rather than going the George Lucas route and using it as time and then having to shoe horn a feeble excuse into the chorus!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-October-2005, 10:07 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,249
Default

I'd like to see the wording used in the article. As we understand the universe, a physical "edge" doesn't exist. It is a bit like talking about the edge of the surface of the earth, just as it makes no sense to talk about the center of the surface of the earth.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-October-2005, 10:21 PM
tbm's Avatar
tbm tbm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: N L Michigan
Posts: 593
Default

Apperently Simon Singh doesn't have anything better to do with his time. People like him really bug me.

tbm
__________________
Paddle faster!! I hear banjo music!!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-October-2005, 11:26 PM
Donnie B.'s Avatar
Donnie B. Donnie B. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,223
Default

Tempest in a teapot, really.

If there's a Katie I feel sorry for, it's Katie Holmes. Deprogramming, anyone?
__________________
Bring back Firefly!

"It is quite clear that Occam's razor does not sharpen in your pyramid." (Nicolas)

"Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest." (Paul Simon)
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-October-2005, 12:52 PM
long live the queeb's Avatar
long live the queeb long live the queeb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: london england
Posts: 85
Default

As her over-hyped warbling is likely to make her VERY rich then no I dont feel sorry for her.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today