Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Small Media at Large
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-October-2005, 07:08 PM
Astrobairn Astrobairn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 211
Default Supernova

Sorry if anyone has started a thread on this already.

The BBC commedy set in an Australian observatory, what a load of mince. They talk to the ISS from the observatory, they do full on data reduction at the telescope, they "charge up the adaptive optics". It's so bad in so many ways.
__________________
Its better tae meddle wi the deil............
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-October-2005, 10:06 PM
novaderrik novaderrik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ashby, MN, USA
Posts: 2,406
Default

is it so bad it's good?
__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion
The.. Best.. Thread..Ever...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 13-October-2005, 01:25 AM
enginelessjohn's Avatar
enginelessjohn enginelessjohn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northants, UK
Posts: 228
Default

Okay the science in it is at Thunderbirds level, but aside from that it's quite funny....

Cheers
John
__________________
The engineer's mantra :-
The glass is neither half full or half empty, it's twice as big as it needs to be....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 15-October-2005, 03:14 AM
hendy hendy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 13
Default

Supernova is so bad it's bad. The concept is good, but the actual show is crude, clichéd humour. I didn't laugh once. There are so many astronomical inaccuracies that Phil could dedicate a sizeable section of BA.com to the first episode alone. Things like:
* The astronaut was in a space station around MARS.
* They had a $200,000 glow-in-the-dark radium lens.
* They could see the accretion disk of a black hole, with gas swirling around it.
* The control room was the same room as the telescope, with the astronomers working right underneath it. The telescope seemed to be modern, but was on a flimsy-looking German equatorial mount.
* The astronomical jargon was bandied about with little regard to what makes sense and more to what sounds technical.
* The astronomers were operating the telescope like they were in a NATO command bunker and Russia had just launched 20 nuclear ICBMs.

I'm going to watch the second episode to see if it gets any better, but I don't have much hope.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 17-October-2005, 04:40 AM
kylenano's Avatar
kylenano kylenano is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 100 miles N of London, UK
Posts: 221
Default

After watching it, my response was 'yuk!'.

And I thought whoever created this 'comedy' should be made to watch The Dish (although I know it's not entirely accurate) several times to see how Australian astronomical comedy should be done.
__________________
Carolyn

"All the screens are filled with heroes and losers, but the sky's still filled with stars"
...Midnight Oil - 'Golden Age'
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today