Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Small Media at Large
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-January-2002, 12:07 PM
SeanF's Avatar
SeanF SeanF is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 5,205
Default

Okay, this doesn't really qualify as "Bad Astronomy," but I found it kind of interesting and am curious what the folks here think about it.

For my job (IT support), I came across this website for a software product that's supposed to make Windows more reliable (frankly, I'd be impressed if somebody could make Windows any less reliable!). At any rate, about a quarter of the way down the page is this sentence:

Quote:
WinFix is itself fault-tolerant and self-repairing, for NASA-style reliability, making it the most robust and dependable program of its kind.
I smiled when I read that.

So, what do you all think? Does describing a product as having "NASA-style reliability" strike you as being good advertising, or do you think the general public today might be less-than-impressed with NASA's reliability image?

Note: I, myself, think NASA does a great job in this regard. I'm just thinking that their failures tend to get so much more media attention than their successes that the general public may not share that opinion . . .


__________________
SeanF

"Ask to understand, but don't challenge unless you have the knowledge."--NEOWatcher

The contents of this post are ©2008 by SeanF and may not be copied or retransmitted in any form without the express written consent of SeanF
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-January-2002, 12:47 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,223
Default

"NASA-style" reliability doesn't sound like much of an endorsement, sad to say. Maybe in the Apollo days.

I also liked this bit:

Quote:
It uses a modified-classical afferent-efferent, transform-centered design, where the inputs are abstracted to higher and higher levels until the transform center is reached (afferent side), and then the actions and outputs are generated in a symmetrical fashion down the efferent side. The wizards correspond to the afferent side, and the agents to the efferent side.
which as far as I (a software engineer for twenty years) can tell is total gobbledegook.

__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-January-2002, 02:40 PM
Valiant Dancer's Avatar
Valiant Dancer Valiant Dancer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
On 2002-01-11 08:47, ToSeek wrote:
"NASA-style" reliability doesn't sound like much of an endorsement, sad to say. Maybe in the Apollo days.

I also liked this bit:

Quote:
It uses a modified-classical afferent-efferent, transform-centered design, where the inputs are abstracted to higher and higher levels until the transform center is reached (afferent side), and then the actions and outputs are generated in a symmetrical fashion down the efferent side. The wizards correspond to the afferent side, and the agents to the efferent side.
which as far as I (a software engineer for twenty years) can tell is total gobbledegook.

You've got 7 years on me, but I agree this is completely marketing buzzword garbage. Let you know that the person writing the statement had no clue what it was about but, dang, it looked good on paper.


__________________
Valiant Dancer
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-January-2002, 02:58 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,223
Default

Quote:
On 2002-01-11 10:40, Valiant Dancer wrote:
You've got 7 years on me, but I agree this is completely marketing buzzword garbage. Let you know that the person writing the statement had no clue what it was about but, dang, it looked good on paper.
Yeah, my first thought was "Boy, I want one of those!" until I realized it was impressive-sounding nonsense.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 14-January-2002, 03:30 PM
Code Red Code Red is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Top Secret Undersea Lair, Pacific Ocean
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
It uses a modified-classical afferent-efferent, transform-centered design, where the inputs are abstracted to higher and higher levels until the transform center is reached (afferent side), and then the actions and outputs are generated in a symmetrical fashion down the efferent side. The wizards correspond to the afferent side, and the agents to the efferent side.
Sounds like excellent material for a Dilbert cartoon... I wonder if the guy who wrote this had pointy hair...
__________________
Red

"Go to Blue Alert!"
"Is that really necessary Sir? It will mean changing the bulb..."
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 14-January-2002, 05:49 PM
aurorae aurorae is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 321
Default

Quote:
On 2002-01-11 08:47, ToSeek wrote:

I also liked this bit:

Quote:
It uses a modified-classical afferent-efferent, transform-centered design, where the inputs are abstracted to higher and higher levels until the transform center is reached (afferent side), and then the actions and outputs are generated in a symmetrical fashion down the efferent side. The wizards correspond to the afferent side, and the agents to the efferent side.
which as far as I (a software engineer for twenty years) can tell is total gobbledegook.
I think what that is saying is that it takes in data, does something to it, and spits it back out.

In other words, it says Garbage in, Garbage out

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 14-January-2002, 07:36 PM
Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gonzales, LA
Posts: 171
Send a message via AIM to Tom Send a message via Skype™ to Tom
Default

I think it comes with one of those gadgets to improve your cell phone reception, too.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 15-January-2002, 01:15 AM
The Rat The Rat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 127
Default

Quote:
On 2002-01-14 15:36, Tom wrote:
I think it comes with one of those gadgets to improve your cell phone reception, too.
And the whole thing runs with one of them thar 100 mile per gallon carburators... yeah,... yeah,...

Where's my Scotch...?
__________________
Bailey’s second law; There is no relationship between the three virtues of intelligence, education, and wisdom.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2002, 03:11 AM
Chip's Avatar
Chip Chip is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 38.582 N / -121.49 W
Posts: 2,062
Default

To Seek wrote: I also liked this bit:

"It uses a modified-classical afferent-efferent, transform-centered design, where the inputs are abstracted to higher and higher levels until the transform center is reached (afferent side), and then the actions and outputs are generated in a symmetrical fashion down the efferent side. The wizards correspond to the afferent side, and the agents to the efferent side."[/quote]

"Which as far as I (a software engineer for twenty years) can tell is total gobbledegook."

============================================

True. But, I knew a guy once who had efferent transform centers installed in his computer. He could lift a car!

As for me, you should see the way I look now that I've adapted modified-classical afferent-efferent transform-centered designs in my home. Here I am: http://www.auntie.com/dustcatchers/ross/flash-ga.jpg

Meals are a snap. Mrs. Chip is also happy with the household disintegrator beam, though those pesky Monsters from the Id bother us sometimes. (But they come in handy around Halloween.) [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_eek.gif[/img]

Chip Morbious


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Chip on 2002-01-15 23:14 ]</font>
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2002, 12:24 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,223
Default

Quote:
On 2002-01-15 23:11, Chip wrote:

As for me, you should see the way I look now that I've adapted modified-classical afferent-efferent transform-centered designs in my home. Here I am: http://www.auntie.com/dustcatchers/ross/flash-ga.jpg
I like the hat. Does it keep the mind rays out or help you broadcast them yourself?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2002, 02:52 PM
Chip's Avatar
Chip Chip is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 38.582 N / -121.49 W
Posts: 2,062
Default

Quote:
On 2002-01-16 08:24, ToSeek wrote:
I like the hat. Does it keep the mind rays out or help you broadcast them yourself?
Well, a little of both actually. The hat (as you call it) helps me broadcast mind rays directly to the Bad Astronomy Bulletin Board! (But I can only reach the movie pages mentally.) For the General Astronomy pages I have to go back to the keyboard. Oops, gota go, Zorgon is calling from Altair 4! [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Chip on 2002-01-16 10:53 ]</font>
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today