|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Okay, this doesn't really qualify as "Bad Astronomy," but I found it kind of interesting and am curious what the folks here think about it.
For my job (IT support), I came across this website for a software product that's supposed to make Windows more reliable (frankly, I'd be impressed if somebody could make Windows any less reliable!). At any rate, about a quarter of the way down the page is this sentence: Quote:
So, what do you all think? Does describing a product as having "NASA-style reliability" strike you as being good advertising, or do you think the general public today might be less-than-impressed with NASA's reliability image? Note: I, myself, think NASA does a great job in this regard. I'm just thinking that their failures tend to get so much more media attention than their successes that the general public may not share that opinion . . .
__________________
SeanF "Ask to understand, but don't challenge unless you have the knowledge."--NEOWatcher The contents of this post are ©2008 by SeanF and may not be copied or retransmitted in any form without the express written consent of SeanF |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Valiant Dancer |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Red "Go to Blue Alert!" "Is that really necessary Sir? It will mean changing the bulb..." |
|
|||
|
Quote:
In other words, it says Garbage in, Garbage out |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Where's my Scotch...?
__________________
Bailey’s second law; There is no relationship between the three virtues of intelligence, education, and wisdom. |
|
||||
|
To Seek wrote: I also liked this bit:
"It uses a modified-classical afferent-efferent, transform-centered design, where the inputs are abstracted to higher and higher levels until the transform center is reached (afferent side), and then the actions and outputs are generated in a symmetrical fashion down the efferent side. The wizards correspond to the afferent side, and the agents to the efferent side."[/quote] "Which as far as I (a software engineer for twenty years) can tell is total gobbledegook." ============================================ True. But, I knew a guy once who had efferent transform centers installed in his computer. He could lift a car! As for me, you should see the way I look now that I've adapted modified-classical afferent-efferent transform-centered designs in my home. Here I am: http://www.auntie.com/dustcatchers/ross/flash-ga.jpg Meals are a snap. Mrs. Chip is also happy with the household disintegrator beam, though those pesky Monsters from the Id bother us sometimes. (But they come in handy around Halloween.) [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_eek.gif[/img] Chip Morbious <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Chip on 2002-01-15 23:14 ]</font> |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Chip on 2002-01-16 10:53 ]</font> |