|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
I can't believe the current state of American stupidity in terms of science, geography, and our own freakin language. This causes such horiffically stupid movies such as most recently: The Core. A movie filled with so many scientific inconsistancy's, that no one in the general public knows what is and isn't right.It's just sad how writers and actors can willingly declare that the science of The Core is in any way correct. I'm sorry to have offended anyone, but I just wanted to point out the sad shortcummings on the part of Amercan inteligence. thank you. ![]()
__________________
opinion mista' |
|
||||
|
It is said that you never get a second chance to make a good first impression. You have blown yours as "crumb44". However, due to the nature of the internet, you can rejoin under a new "nick" and post intelligently (and only you and the BA will know about your inauspicious start).
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day. T. Anderson |
|
|||
|
386T = 3-4-06 7:14 A.M. PST {still on std?}
got my PREmitt..{{hip hip took a trip}} From : MIDIOGRE Number : 178 of 179 To : HUB Date : 04/05/03 7:59pm Subject : welcome Reference : 168 Read : 04/06/03 7:49am Private : NO Hub - its OK for you to post those Alvord pictures elsewhere. - m now4 the confusing pooshun? &A1 2 3 7:16 A.M. { still PSt } I should have the page links back {END of next week} |
|
|||
|
I agree. This is inapropriate and the subject heading is also. While i feel it is o.k. to rant about the science in The Core (we have done that alot), but to call America stupid and make Ad hominum remarks about americans in general is too far. While i would mostly agree with you in person, on this board you have to have more proof. Show us something like test scores or that National Geographic article that was run some months ago. Show us a article written by a English professor talking about the abhorid use of grammar and spelling (mostly by me :-)) in the American culture.
Just saying that American's are stupid and mess up their own language will get you nowhere. Movies Like [i]The Core[/i[] are made more for the box office reciepts than for the chance that they will make people learn. Nova does a much better job at making us learn. We have had threads about the Sad State of Science education, but in those threads it does not degrade to "you are stupid, we are all stupid". Instead it is calm and beneficial. The professors, Students, and teachers on this board tell it like it is in their classes. They give helpful hinnts of how to we personally can prevent this in the future. Ranting will get you nowhere. I might be a little more lenient than others and give you a second chance with this name. A chance to start over with a new first impression to me (i can't speak for others or the BA). I hope you make it a good one.
__________________
GIYUL :-) "It takes Thousands to fight a battle for a mile, Millions to hold an election for a nation, but it only takes One to change the world." - Dan Sandler 2002 |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
yeah....I agree, judging a group of people, any people, is stupid and disgusting. The United-States has over 300 million people in it and is the third most populated country in the world. In addition to that, I would argue that it is far more diverse than the two countries that have a larger population.
While I'm ranting (even though yes, I know it's not the place), the amount of irrational anti-americanism that I hear in Canada makes me ashamed of being Canadian. :x
__________________
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts." --Bertrand Russell |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
The funny thing about crumb44's post is that I think he's probably American. It's also possible that he expected the people on this board to jump right in and agree with him. Let's hope he sees that he misread us and will try again.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
I mean, the earth does have a magnetic field and it does have a core and... and... Okay, help me out here. What else did they get right?
__________________
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity. Isaac Asimov |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
I have to defend crumb44 in spite of his bad spelling. I think there's a connection between bad science and a peculiar sort of anti-intellectualism in our culture. For instance how many beer commercials have you seen that seem to celebrate stupidity? And why do people think there's no need for correct spelling and grammar in e-mails? Would you call it a lack of intellectual pride? The same thing allows people who know very little science to think it doesn't matter.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
I agree with the beer commercials. spelling in e-mails is just being lazy, not poor grammar. I do not use them in my term papers. Why type out a 13 letter word when a 3 letter short for the word does just as well? It is just a personal correspondence. If it was official i would think you would never see LOL or ROFL anywhere in the e-mail. Most people that i know do not take the science in movies seriously. And i am willing to bet that the average american does not either. What i do have a problem with is like you say, when the movie says it is correct science when it is not. This does not make people dumber, that is impossible. It just misleads them and sends them down the wrong path. By visiting here or any other science board they can easily be corrected with only a little bit of a hurt ego. :-) Welcome to the board!!
__________________
GIYUL :-) "It takes Thousands to fight a battle for a mile, Millions to hold an election for a nation, but it only takes One to change the world." - Dan Sandler 2002 |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Welcome to the BABB, Avitochol, but the Turf Greenius forum is two doors down. ![]() |
|
|||
|
Nope. Mapnut doesn't make spelling errors. Honestly, although there are obviously many brilliant Americans, don't you think the media enjoy and profit from exploiting the many not-so-brilliant?
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
You are absolutely right about the exploitation issue, but it is not limited to the not-so-brilliant. In fact, I think it is the opposite end of the spectrum that is taken in more surely--because, it's been said, they're so confident in their skill at detecting fraud. |
|
|||
|
My $0.02 worth about exploitation of the dumb and credulous by "the media":
I believe "the media" would much rather have a lot more smart, well-informed people around. They would have a bigger market for their more in-depth stories that way. I believe "the media" will always pander to the lowest common denominator as a means of ensuring its own popularity, that the best way to improve the quality of the media is to raise this lowest common denominator, and that the media will profit more from, and be grateful for, a more well-informed and well-educated public. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
The writers may wish for a more intelligent audience, but i'm not so sure about the producers. |
|
||||
|
I think with the media there is a wide range of approaches. Some outlets take the high-road and go with informative, intelligent coverage while others would rather do a three-page story on a Hollywood star getting busted for DUI. The problem lies in that news is a very competetive industry so eventually profit margins and Neilsen ratings win out over integrity. While some media (New York Times, 60 Minutes) have a good enough reputation that they do not have to pander to the lowest common denominator the vast majority have to if they are to survive. North America can expect to see more shows like 'Jerry Springer' because such shows are popular. I can't see this trend ending anytime soon.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
date shows (The Bachelor et al). I'm wondering how long before somebody comes up with "The Affair" - sixteen weeks of two people cheating on their spouses. Gee they could even justify it as a public service show so that we would all know the "signs" to look for. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
But to turn it back to astronomy, competition leads to sensationalism in media, as that is seen as one of the few ways to get the audience to tune in. Does anyone think FOX really cared about integrity when it aired that show about the moon landing being a hoax? Who here has seen promotions for 'asteriods are going to kill us all' programs? I'm willing to bet shows discussing heartfelt renditions of being probed by aliens will get more people watching than a show about the discovery of Quaoar. So is the media to blame? Education to blame? Extensive TV viewing to blame? Who's to say. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|