Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General Interest > Small Media at Large
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #391 (permalink)  
Old 11-August-2003, 06:06 PM
Stuart Stuart is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 692
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wedgebert
Actually, there wouldn't be a fireball in space A nuke in space would just be a giant flash of light along with a massive release of non-visible radiation. A starship hull isn't going to help much against the radiation levels a nuke puts out (depending on yield of course). I might absorb a lot of the gamma radiation, but that's going to cause the hull itself to heat up and it can cause it to break apart as well. I'd wager that a kiloton nuke going off 100 meters from your hull is going to cause serious problems to both the hull and the crew inside.
True; the primary killing system is the sleet of radiation the device produces. There was a lot of work done on the design of space-initiated nuclear devices back in the old days of Nike-Zeus. The designs used a lot of tricks to up the radiation yield at the expense of the blast and thermal effects. One of them was to wrap the device in gold foil. The "explosive" effects of an initiation in space are astonishingly limited; 100 meters probably would protect a reasonably heavily-constructed space ship from damage from a 1 kiloton initiation. Unless the warhead was heavily doped using tricks, I believe the hull would provide enough protection to limit radiation damage to the crew. In Balance of Terror, the nuclear device used was IIRC a scuttling charge. So it was probably a pretty conventional device.

By the way. most of the radioactive product from an initiation comes from debris being sucked into the fireball. That ain't going to happen much in space. We never really worried much about gamma. If blast and flash are going to reduce a victim to the size and appearance of a McDonalds hamburger, irradiating them as well isn't a productive use of resources. As a friend of mine put it, it isn't the explosion that kills you, its the fall to the bottom of the crater.
Reply With Quote
  #392 (permalink)  
Old 11-August-2003, 08:59 PM
RBG RBG is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 417
Default

"Don't forget, Star Trek has Vulcan and Betazoid telepathy."


Example of Betazoid Empath telepathy:

Seething alien on screen.

Empath: "Captain, I sense that he is angry."

RBG
Reply With Quote
  #393 (permalink)  
Old 11-August-2003, 09:06 PM
Glom's Avatar
Glom Glom is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West London, England
Posts: 8,412
Send a message via MSN to Glom
Default

Quote:
JONAS: Still, I'm usually a lot better at reading people.

CHEKOV: Major, why wasn't I told about the X-302?

JONAS: For example, it might not be obvious to some people, but this man is really upset.
Jonas is clearly Betazoid.

Reply With Quote
  #394 (permalink)  
Old 12-August-2003, 09:55 AM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 8,675
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart

snip

This episode also discounts the claim that's been made here to the effect that a realistic depeiction of sensors and weapons couldn't be done because of the need for "dramatic tension". Balance of Terror with its sensor problems and the threat of the Romulan weapon drips dramatic tension. This shows that the "dramatic tension" argument is really a feeble excuse for lousy scriptwriting and poor direction/production.
I disagree, this iws a perfect example of where the sensor deficiencies are completely a plot device to raise tension, if the sensors had been better then there goes the entire plot.
__________________
All Moderation in Purple
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice
Reply With Quote
  #395 (permalink)  
Old 01-December-2003, 12:40 AM
Glom's Avatar
Glom Glom is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West London, England
Posts: 8,412
Send a message via MSN to Glom
Default

Let this thread live!
Reply With Quote
  #396 (permalink)  
Old 01-December-2003, 09:30 AM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 8,675
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glom
Let this thread live!

It's worse than that, It's dead Jim.
__________________
All Moderation in Purple
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice
Reply With Quote
  #397 (permalink)  
Old 02-December-2003, 05:42 AM
Colt's Avatar
Colt Colt is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Empire of Alaska
Posts: 1,424
Send a message via ICQ to Colt Send a message via MSN to Colt
Default

I remember this therad.. It's like a poltergeist. Good when making noise. :wink: -Colt
Reply With Quote
  #398 (permalink)  
Old 02-December-2003, 06:39 AM
Zamboni Zamboni is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain swoop
It's worse than that, It's dead Jim.
Spock: Live long and prosper...

I didn't read any of the posts in this thread so don't expect anything new or fresh from me.
Reply With Quote
  #399 (permalink)  
Old 02-December-2003, 11:47 AM
ZaphodBeeblebrox's Avatar
ZaphodBeeblebrox ZaphodBeeblebrox is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Henniker, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 4,598
Send a message via AIM to ZaphodBeeblebrox Send a message via Yahoo to ZaphodBeeblebrox
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain swoop
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glom
Let this thread live!

It's worse than that, It's dead Jim.
Quick, you get its Tricorder.

I'll get its Wallet!
__________________
If you Ignore YOUR Rights, they Will go away.
Reply With Quote
  #400 (permalink)  
Old 04-December-2003, 10:30 PM
Wingnut Ninja Wingnut Ninja is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Middlebury, VT
Posts: 497
Send a message via AIM to Wingnut Ninja
Default

Hey, this thread just doesn't die, does it? Anyway, I thought I'd point out that

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doodler
the Not-So-Great Machine of Epsilon III
sounds perfect for The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
__________________
Neither love nor money makes the world go round.
Unfortunately, we're down to about 17 ounces of the highly unstable stuff that does.
Reply With Quote
  #401 (permalink)  
Old 20-December-2003, 04:00 PM
Glom's Avatar
Glom Glom is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West London, England
Posts: 8,412
Send a message via MSN to Glom
Default

Getting back to the issue of the TR-116, O'Brien said that a projectile weapon was under research to be used in energy dampened environments (probably like the planet in 'Paradise' [DS9]), but it was abandoned in favour of regenerative phasers.

First, if you're in an energy dampening field, regenerative or not, the phaser won't work.

Second, what does it mean for a phaser to be regenerative. We know what regenerative shields mean, but phasers aren't known to loose power. The other explanation I can think of is one that violates the laws of thermodynamics The phaser never runs out of energy. Still, what do you expect?

But, clearly the TR-116 was under development for combat purposes, but for the reasons demonstrated by Stuart, it's crap! And why do they need to develop a projectile weapon? Just dust of the old records and use an M-16 or something. The arrogance of Starfleet is amazing. They never even think of using projectile weapons when it is shown that they are so much better.
Reply With Quote
  #402 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2003, 09:54 AM
Zamboni Zamboni is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 313
Default

What the...? Who brought this thread back up? Besides, there's another thread (or more) discussing projectile weapons vs energy weapons.

Regenerative phasers means rechargeable phasers; regular phasers use energy cartrige like current weapons.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today