Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Small Media at Large
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-July-2003, 09:53 PM
The Supreme Canuck's Avatar
The Supreme Canuck The Supreme Canuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,801
Default We were wrong all along!

I was reading "Redemption Ark" by Alastair Reynolds a few days ago and I came across something that struck me as funny because we are always complaining about the opposite:

Quote:
[s]he realised that this was a detail that they always got wrong in the space opera holo-dramas, where laser beams were invisible, the sinister element of invisibility adding to the drama. But a real close-range space battle was a faar messier affair, with gas clouds and chaff shards erupting all over the place, ready to reflect and disperse any beam weapon.
Since the character is observing an actual space battle in the early 27th century, it must be true!
__________________
Quaeso quousque humi defixa tua mens erit? Nonne aspicis, quae in templa veneris?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-July-2003, 11:23 PM
gethen's Avatar
gethen gethen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: the great white north
Posts: 2,389
Default

So firing off a laser during one of these "space battles" would be a lot like releasing the ball in a pinball machine? Cool. Never know what it might hit en route and where it might end up. That could kind of discourage you from firing at all.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2003, 12:48 AM
The Supreme Canuck's Avatar
The Supreme Canuck The Supreme Canuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,801
Default

Well, um... no, not exactly. When you shine a laser through a cloud of gas or other particles, some of the photons are reflected and scattered at angles to the laser beam. The beam itself will barely be affected and will go pretty much straight, but the stray photons will allow the laser to be seen.

The quote is a parody of what most people into science fiction say; that you can't see lasers in space. The author makes it so that the science fiction movie (hologram) makers have it the opposite way from how they have it now; they have it so you can't see lasers. But in reality, the debris from a battle would allow you to see the lasers. Makes you think, doesn't it? :wink:
__________________
Quaeso quousque humi defixa tua mens erit? Nonne aspicis, quae in templa veneris?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2003, 03:05 AM
gethen's Avatar
gethen gethen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: the great white north
Posts: 2,389
Default

Rats. ops: I kind of liked the idea of the space cowboys firing ricochet lasers around.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2003, 03:25 AM
tracer tracer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Silicon Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 2,083
Default

"Space cowboys"?

Darn it, you just reminded me of an awful awful awful awful awful episode of Challenge of the Super Friends, where Green Lantern had to go fight some robot-cattle rustlers on planet Texicana.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2003, 03:50 AM
gethen's Avatar
gethen gethen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: the great white north
Posts: 2,389
Default

Well, it's not up the quality of Josie and the Pussycats in Outerspace I guess?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2003, 10:02 AM
AstroSmurf's Avatar
AstroSmurf AstroSmurf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,031
Send a message via ICQ to AstroSmurf
Default

Someone made a comment before about some story where they had problem aiming the laser guns since the beams were invisible:

Solution: Smash a few containers containing compressed gas, "contaminating" the vacuum so that the laser beams became visible.

On the same subject, Larry Niven seems to think laser guns work best for slashing work. Fire, then slash your beam across the target.
__________________
"We do not require reality to conform to the expectations of the ignorant"
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2003, 10:10 AM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,052
Default

Maybe you meant my posting?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2003, 11:56 AM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroSmurf
Someone made a comment before about some story where they had problem aiming the laser guns since the beams were invisible:

Solution: Smash a few containers containing compressed gas, "contaminating" the vacuum so that the laser beams became visible.

On the same subject, Larry Niven seems to think laser guns work best for slashing work. Fire, then slash your beam across the target.
If you are in space using laser weapons surely you have some kind of fire control that can aim a laser?

Even back in WWII Radar controlled gunnery systems were in use with electro mechanical 'plotting tables' giving firing solution in real time.

Why would you need to see the beam?
__________________
'The eye can only see what the mind is prepared to accept'
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2003, 12:47 PM
Iain Lambert Iain Lambert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain swoop
Why would you need to see the beam?
Because its a Well Known Fact that in any random science fiction story, the future feels the need to occasionally throw technology at a problem when there is no need whatsoever. Fashionable warriors of the future wouldn't be seen dead with something as boring as an optical sight on their gun.

Firing invisible lasers is so much more difficult than conventional weaponry, where bullets travel so slowly you can see where they are going. Or something.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2003, 01:11 PM
darkhunter's Avatar
darkhunter darkhunter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,135
Default

A visible laser beam would give away your position anyways....With an invisible beam a laser would make the perfect sniper weapon--silent, no location give-away, where you aim is where you hit (no windage/elevation adjustments)...

Lots of ways to aim--from small spotting laser visible through an helmet mounted display, zero on on exact target and hammer in a full powered pulse, to a simple old fasioned sight....

I agree--some stories throw in tect for tech sake with no reason--then have stuff more primitive than current technology. ..
__________________
"Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it." — Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man

441!!!! :)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2003, 01:27 PM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkhunter

I agree--some stories throw in tect for tech sake with no reason--then have stuff more primitive than current technology. ..

Usually anything to do with weapons or their fire control systems, although there was a movie in about 1985 with Tom Selleck, it was called Runaway and there were guns with cool homing bullets that could swerve rounfd peope or objects between the target and the gun.
__________________
'The eye can only see what the mind is prepared to accept'
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2003, 08:41 PM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,052
Default

Voila: the ZF-1. It's light. Handle's adjustable for easy carrying; good for righties and lefties. Breaks down into 4 parts, undetectable by x-ray; ideal for quick, discreet interventions. A word on firepower. Three thousand round clip with bursts of 3 to 300. With the Replay button (another Zorg invention) it's even easier. One shot, and Replay sends every following shot to the same location. And to finish the job, all the Zorg oldies but goldies. Rocket launcher. Arrow launcher, with explodin' and poisonous gas heads. Very practical. Our famous net launcher. The ALWAYS efficient flame-thrower. My favorite. And for the Grand Finale, the all new "Ice Cube System!"
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2003, 09:18 PM
Humphrey's Avatar
Humphrey Humphrey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: G'Topia
Posts: 3,481
Send a message via ICQ to Humphrey Send a message via AIM to Humphrey Send a message via MSN to Humphrey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kucharek
Voila: the ZF-1. It's light. Handle's adjustable for easy carrying; good for righties and lefties. Breaks down into 4 parts, undetectable by x-ray; ideal for quick, discreet interventions. A word on firepower. Three thousand round clip with bursts of 3 to 300. With the Replay button (another Zorg invention) it's even easier. One shot, and Replay sends every following shot to the same location. And to finish the job, all the Zorg oldies but goldies. Rocket launcher. Arrow launcher, with explodin' and poisonous gas heads. Very practical. Our famous net launcher. The ALWAYS efficient flame-thrower. My favorite. And for the Grand Finale, the all new "Ice Cube System!"
What does the red button do? [BAM!]


Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2003, 11:21 PM
Musashi's Avatar
Musashi Musashi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Brea, CA USA
Posts: 4,262
Send a message via AIM to Musashi
Default

Anybody ever play Syndicate? There were invisible beam lasers in that game and my agents never had a problem aiming them!
__________________
Hwæt! We Gardena in geardagum,
þeodcyninga, þrym gefrunon,
hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-July-2003, 03:20 AM
Donnie B.'s Avatar
Donnie B. Donnie B. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain swoop
Usually anything to do with weapons or their fire control systems, although there was a movie in about 1985 with Tom Selleck, it was called Runaway and there were guns with cool homing bullets that could swerve rounfd peope or objects between the target and the gun.
As did "Who Killed Roger Rabbit"...
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-July-2003, 03:37 AM
The Supreme Canuck's Avatar
The Supreme Canuck The Supreme Canuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,801
Default

Tom Selleck is Roger Rabbit? I'm getting confused...
__________________
Quaeso quousque humi defixa tua mens erit? Nonne aspicis, quae in templa veneris?
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-July-2003, 04:13 PM
snowcelt's Avatar
snowcelt snowcelt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: edmonton
Posts: 970
Default

Hey,The Supreme Canuck. How would you say in Latin, you 'can not beat a dead horse?' Love latin, but as an iliterate in this language (Latin); as well as English and French, I assume you can only try.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-July-2003, 09:00 PM
The Supreme Canuck's Avatar
The Supreme Canuck The Supreme Canuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,801
Default

Uh...wha...uh...you see...uh...um...

Ah nuts.

All right. You got me. I know absolutely NO LATIN WHATSOEVER. I'm just a big faker. I just remember my sig from somewhere and it seemed to stick in my mind...

But I do know French!
__________________
Quaeso quousque humi defixa tua mens erit? Nonne aspicis, quae in templa veneris?
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 05-July-2003, 09:13 PM
The Supreme Canuck's Avatar
The Supreme Canuck The Supreme Canuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,801
Default

Oh, just so you don't get the wrong impression, I've never actually claimed that I knew any Latin. You see, nobody ever asked me! Until now, that is...
__________________
Quaeso quousque humi defixa tua mens erit? Nonne aspicis, quae in templa veneris?
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 06-July-2003, 03:46 AM
wedgebert wedgebert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,214
Default

Ok, listen up, it's lesson time. Here are some useful latin phrases that everyone should know:

Exercitus ingens urum salutavit. Obdormivit urus.
The huge army greeted the buffalo. The buffalo fell asleep.

non commodus est mihi desilire.
It is not convenient for me to jump down.

Euge! Murus sum! Eheu, ardeo.
Hooray! I am a wall! Alas, I am burning.

Imperator concidit ut brassica esset.
The Emperor fell down in order to be a cabbage.

Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
I'm not interested in your dopey religious cult.

Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

Vah! Denuone Latine loquebar? Me ineptum. Interdum modo elabitur.
Oh! Was I speaking Latin again? Silly me. Sometimes it just sort of slips out.

and my personal favorite

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Anything in Latin sounds profound.
__________________
People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
Reply With Quote