Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General Interest > Small Media at Large
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2007, 01:30 PM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASEI View Post
An additional consequence of these super-drives should be a need for very hot, very large radiator foils.
They just dump their excess heat into Hyperspace.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
"The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2007, 02:34 PM
Ilya's Avatar
Ilya Ilya is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,465
Default

Somewhat off-topic: Alastair Reynolds' "Revelation Space" features an aircraft (NOT a spacecraft) which does not violate fundamental laws of physics, but probably takes the cake for "excessive unobtainium overengineering when much easier solutions would work for far less energy". The plane is aerodynamic (delta wing), and its entire underside is covered in miniature jet nozzles (I assume intakes are on top) which heat the air to plasma temeperature and expel it downward and backward -- or sideways if needed. Energy source is unexplained. Nozzles stand up to near-sun-surface temperatures. Looking up at a low-flying plane can cause permanent eye damage.

[Edited]: Now that I think of it, if you DO have materials that can stand up to photosphere temperatures, and a power source of appropriate energy density, then it is not a bad design. Very few moving parts, and if some nozzles fail, there is only slight loss of performance. The fact that you can not look at it without welders' goggles is a problem though.
__________________
Fiction has to be plausible. Reality is under no such constraint.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2007, 03:04 PM
Matherly Matherly is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,283
Default Yes, but...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
I was also a bit surprised at the new B5 DVD showing aircars going all over New York.
Yes, but...

A. How far in the future was that? Galen never says.

AND

B. How much access to Minbari technology did Earth have as part of the IA? I would say quite a bit since the Excalibur appeared to have Gar/Anti gav tech.
__________________
Carl Matherly

Offical Battlestar Galactica Apologist

Named Time Magazine's 2006 "Person of the Year"
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2007, 04:09 PM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 5,691
Default

The Aircars in OA use fancloth, which is a speculative material imagined by J Storrs Hall.

more details on fancloth here
http://www.imm.org/publications/reports/rep004/

I have taken the opportunity to make my illustration look just a little like Supercar...
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2007, 04:25 PM
Moose's Avatar
Moose Moose is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Maritimes
Posts: 10,063
Send a message via MSN to Moose
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matherly View Post
A. How far in the future was that? Galen never says.
He does indeed. "Thirty years from now..."

Sheridan and the Centauri Prince visit Babylon 5 about ten years before the events in Sleeping in Light. According to Galen, ten years after Sleeping in Light, Vir Cotto dies and the Centauri Prince becomes Emperor. Twenty years after Sleeping in Light, in that timeline, the Centauri Prince decides to take out the Humans, which is what you see depicted just off of Central Park in Galen's vision.

Quote:
B. How much access to Minbari technology did Earth have as part of the IA? I would say quite a bit since the Excalibur appeared to have Gar/Anti gav tech.
According to the ISA treaty, artificial gravity was specifically offered to the humans as an enticement to sign on. Objects at Rest suggested that Sheridan wanted the Humans and Minbari to work closely together on advanced starships.

Air Cars don't seem to be all that much of a stretch from there.
__________________
And you, to whom adversity has dealt the final blow
With smiling [faces] lyin' to ye' everywhere ye' go
Turn to, and put out all your strength of arm and heart and brain
And like the Mary Ellen Carter, rise again.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2007, 04:29 PM
Tucson_Tim Tucson_Tim is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,361
Default

In the ST world, the Borg ships are the pinnacle of aerodynamic design.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2007, 04:30 PM
mike alexander's Avatar
mike alexander mike alexander is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Posts: 9,967
Default

For intrinsic un-airworthiness I nominate Manhattan (from the Cities in Flight stories). Of course, once you have a spindizzy you can do pretty much whatever you want.
__________________
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2007, 04:32 PM
Moose's Avatar
Moose Moose is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Maritimes
Posts: 10,063
Send a message via MSN to Moose
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tucson_Tim View Post
In the ST world, the Borg ships are the pinnacle of aerodynamic design.
The Borg own slowing down efficiently in atmo.
__________________
And you, to whom adversity has dealt the final blow
With smiling [faces] lyin' to ye' everywhere ye' go
Turn to, and put out all your strength of arm and heart and brain
And like the Mary Ellen Carter, rise again.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2007, 04:33 PM
Tucson_Tim Tucson_Tim is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moose View Post
The Borg own slowing down efficiently in atmo.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2007, 05:30 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 17,691
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moose View Post
The Borg own slowing down efficiently in atmo.
Well, you know what they say.... Air resistance is futile.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2007, 10:32 PM
Nowhere Man's Avatar
Nowhere Man Nowhere Man is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southfield MI
Posts: 2,234
Default

Does that make the borg hottie from ST: First Contact a drag queen?

Fred
__________________
"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2007, 10:52 PM
Doodler's Avatar
Doodler Doodler is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Laurel, Maryland
Posts: 9,891
Send a message via MSN to Doodler Send a message via Yahoo to Doodler
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhere Man View Post
Does that make the borg hottie from ST: First Contact a drag queen?

Fred
After doing the time warp, I'd say yes, definitely a Transylvanian transvestite...
__________________
The last time I felt a warm fuzzy feeling, I was informed by my doctor that it was just gas.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2007, 11:09 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moose View Post
According to the ISA treaty, artificial gravity was specifically offered to the humans as an enticement to sign on. Objects at Rest suggested that Sheridan wanted the Humans and Minbari to work closely together on advanced starships.

Air Cars don't seem to be all that much of a stretch from there.
Yes, it was 30 years, but the sky was filled with aircars. Sheridan doesn't comment on the novelty. Also, going from the initial introduction to near universal use seems a bit much in that time frame. And, there is still the issue of atmospheric Star Furies that predate this (which aren't shown hovering on rockets, but seem to do just fine with little or no lift).

It comes down to something I just don't believe they considered when writing/showing this.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2007, 12:08 AM
Certassar's Avatar
Certassar Certassar is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Danmark
Posts: 106
Default

I don't see how it's a problem if a spacecraft is going to crash or catch fire when entering atmosphere. All you need to do is call the flying fire engines of StarWars episode 3. No matter how bad a shape your spaceship is in, they'll sprinkle some water on you and make sure you land safely, even if your spaceship is falling through the air in exactly the same way a Vogon spacecraft isn't.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2007, 04:04 PM
JustAFriend JustAFriend is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 982
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manchurian Taikonaut View Post
You don't have to be an expert in the aircraft industry to know when something looks un-flyable (<< ?? Is that a word ?)
Any kid that threw a paper airplane has a gut feeling about things that can fly in air. A lot of spacecraft we see in scifi look like they would have little maneuverability and be very aerodynamically unstable yet scifi writers, production artists, directors INSIST on flying these things in Earth atmosphere etc

Except that many of the examples HAVE already flown.... as radio-controlled models.

X-Wings, Y-Wings, Vipers and more have been done by the R/C guys over the years.

Browse through the topics over at the E-Zone (Electric powered plane) board sometime and you'll find lots of examples of your 'un-flyable' aircraft...

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/index.php?topic=air-elec


I've been flying R/C for over 30 years now and have seen lots of weird stuff fly well. How about some FLYING TRUCKS to start off with???

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=764854
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2007, 06:29 PM
Chip's Avatar
Chip Chip is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 38.582 N / -121.49 W
Posts: 2,111
Default

For the opposite - aerodynamic shapes but used mostly in space, I nominate the Raiders ships in Babylon 5, which look like they were designed by Jack Northrop.

I suppose they retain WWII style camouflage on the upper surfaces in case they're flying low within a planet's atmosphere and all other means of detection save for human eyes are not available - or it just looks cool.
__________________
"Insignificant molehill sometimes more important than conspicuous mountain." - Charlie Chan
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2007, 10:57 PM
Doodler's Avatar
Doodler Doodler is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Laurel, Maryland
Posts: 9,891
Send a message via MSN to Doodler Send a message via Yahoo to Doodler
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chip View Post
For the opposite - aerodynamic shapes but used mostly in space, I nominate the Raiders ships in Babylon 5, which look like they were designed by Jack Northrop.

I suppose they retain WWII style camouflage on the upper surfaces in case they're flying low within a planet's atmosphere and all other means of detection save for human eyes are not available - or it just looks cool.
Raider ships and Centauri fighters were meant to be transatmospheric fighters, hence their somewhat aerodynamic shape.
__________________
The last time I felt a warm fuzzy feeling, I was informed by my doctor that it was just gas.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 12-November-2007, 10:23 PM
PhantomWolf's Avatar
PhantomWolf PhantomWolf is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base
Posts: 5,663
Send a message via ICQ to PhantomWolf Send a message via AIM to PhantomWolf Send a message via MSN to PhantomWolf Send a message via Yahoo to PhantomWolf
Default

I'd note that the X-Wing (and a number of other SW ships) doesn't have "wings" but rather S-Foils. These are predominately to hold the weapons on. Well to spread the weapons out from the body of the ship and each other to give a better spread of blaster fire from them. They also have heat radiators in them and as a secondary effect may help with stablisation in an atmosphere. Most atmospheric flying is done on Repulsarlift and forward thrust however.
__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 13-November-2007, 02:47 AM
Delvo Delvo is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,613
Default

Since the F-16, American fighter jets have been inherently unstable, deliberately, and so are some of the more recent foreign fighters. While a plane is flying straight forward without any maneuvering adjustments, small momentary changes in air pressure at one part of the plane's surface or another will always develop, which momentarily tug at the plane in one direction or another. With a stable plane, the resulting tiny lateral and/or vertical movement of the plane (if it happens at all) automaticly cancels out the pressure variation, so the plane keeps moving straight forward without having to do anything to compensate. With an unstable plane, the plane's tiny movement as a result of the same tug from the air would magnify the tug instead, jerking the plane out of alignment and sending it into a spin or tumble. An unstable plane can only maintain straight forward flight by making lots of really quick little adjustments in its steering to compensate. That's done by "fly by wire" electronics instead of by the pilot; the maneuvers the pilot intends to make are input to that computer system, which then calculates exactly how to do the maneuver while also constantly adjusting against turbulence to keep itself in the air and in control. Instability is good for maneuverability, as long as it can be kept under enough control that it's not too detrimental to safety, speed, or fuel efficiency.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 13-November-2007, 03:12 AM
Chip's Avatar
Chip Chip is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 38.582 N / -121.49 W
Posts: 2,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delvo View Post
Since the F-16, American fighter jets have been inherently unstable, deliberately, and so are some of the more recent foreign fighters. ...Instability is good for maneuverability, as long as it can be kept under enough control that it's not too detrimental to safety, speed, or fuel efficiency.
Actually this is also true of fighter designs all the way back to the Sopwith Camel.

R/C versions that can actually fly of spacecraft from SciFi shows employ I suspect many clever alterations to maintain workable aerodynamic qualities while still resembling the original model.
__________________
"Insignificant molehill sometimes more important than conspicuous mountain." - Charlie Chan
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 13-November-2007, 03:28 AM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chip View Post
R/C versions that can actually fly of spacecraft from SciFi shows employ I suspect many clever alterations to maintain workable aerodynamic qualities while still resembling the original model.
Not to mention being considerably smaller and lighter.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
"The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 13-November-2007, 07:31 AM
Chip's Avatar
Chip Chip is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 38.582 N / -121.49 W
Posts: 2,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noclevername View Post
Not to mention being considerably smaller and lighter.
Yes! Balsa wood and foam are still among the prime secret materials for "advanced alien spacecraft," (that fly here and now in Earth's atmosphere.)
__________________
"Insignificant molehill sometimes more important than conspicuous mountain." - Charlie Chan
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 13-November-2007, 04:36 PM
Trantor Trantor is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 425
Default

I always thought that those weird looking ships from the movie "Dune" would never work. Without some kind of anti-gravity, they would certainly fall out of the sky like a rock.

I also think the Tardis from Dr. Who wouldn't make it. It's true that it generally just appears and disappears when traveling, but I have seen a few episodes where the Tardis is seen flying in space and in planetary atmospheres. Truly a flying brick!
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 13-November-2007, 05:12 PM
Hokie's Avatar
Hokie Hokie is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 151
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manchurian Taikonaut View Post
You don't have to be an expert in the aircraft industry to know when something looks un-flyable (<< ?? Is that a word ?)
Any kid that threw a paper airplane has a gut feeling about things that can fly in air. A lot of spacecraft we see in scifi look like they would have little maneuverability and be very aerodynamically unstable yet scifi writers, production artists, directors INSIST on flying these things in Earth atmosphere etc


Here are my top 5 bellyflopper

5
"Thunderbolt Star Fury" based on the original Babylon-5 Starfury, JMS did great with the originals, they looked great and he kept them in space but for some reason he insisted on using the new in "Crusade" one to fly missions or leisurely trips on planets

4
"Battlestar Vipers" with tiny little wings I can't see how these things would fly. The new Cylon ships look like the would fall out of the sky also

3
UFO ships in "ID4" Independence Day, considering how vulnerable these things were to some windows bug I'm sure the flight control software was a disaster

2
Star Wars "X-wing", Boba Fett ship etc Most of these ships look like they would drop out of the sky. The Falcon still looks great though

1
A the winner is our "StarTrek Shuttlepods". Built like a brick I've never understood how these things fly, I suppose they have some tractor beam, anti-grav technobabble to overcome that stuff. Apparently it can fly at Mach 8 but it still looks like it would fall like a rock
Why is it so hard to believe that a group capable of interstellar travel would be able to create lift with something other then wings?
__________________
"Ten percent of nothin' is, let me do the math here... nothin' and a nothin', carry the nothin'"

"There are four lights!"
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 13-November-2007, 05:17 PM
Tucson_Tim Tucson_Tim is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hokie View Post
Why is it so hard to believe that a group capable of interstellar travel would be able to create lift with something other then wings?
Exactly what I said in post # 2.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 13-November-2007, 05:24 PM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trantor View Post
I always thought that those weird looking ships from the movie "Dune" would never work. Without some kind of anti-gravity, they would certainly fall out of the sky like a rock.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holtzman_effect
Quote:
I also think the Tardis from Dr. Who wouldn't make it. It's true that it generally just appears and disappears when traveling, but I have seen a few episodes where the Tardis is seen flying in space and in planetary atmospheres. Truly a flying brick!
If it can warp time, it can warp space, and thus gravity.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
"The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 13-November-2007, 05:30 PM
Moose's Avatar
Moose Moose is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Maritimes
Posts: 10,063
Send a message via MSN to Moose
Default

Besides. The thing is bigger, much bigger, on the inside than on the outside, and yet can rest on a variety of surfaces including unreinforced paving, cobblestones, and playground grass without deforming it.

Just imagine the thrust-to-weight ratio it's gotta have? If you can sustain enough thrust, aerodynamics become pretty much irrelevant.
__________________
And you, to whom adversity has dealt the final blow
With smiling [faces] lyin' to ye' everywhere ye' go
Turn to, and put out all your strength of arm and heart and brain
And like the Mary Ellen Carter, rise again.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 13-November-2007, 09:03 PM
Trantor Trantor is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noclevername View Post
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holtzman_effect


If it can warp time, it can warp space, and thus gravity.
Agreed. It is one of my favorite ships. Probably the most advanced and creative design in Sci-Fi.

Thanks for the Dune link. Very interesting reading.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 13-November-2007, 09:10 PM
PhantomWolf's Avatar
PhantomWolf PhantomWolf is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base
Posts: 5,663
Send a message via ICQ to PhantomWolf Send a message via AIM to PhantomWolf Send a message via MSN to PhantomWolf Send a message via Yahoo to PhantomWolf
Default

You have to remember that what the TARDIS looks like is not necessarily its actual shape as well since the shape is part of its cloak mechanism. It's just that the Doctor's TARDIS's cloaking device got stuck on Police Box and he's never been able to fix it (well except in one episode but it broke again.)
__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 13-November-2007, 09:36 PM
Trantor Trantor is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomWolf View Post
You have to remember that what the TARDIS looks like is not necessarily its actual shape as well since the shape is part of its cloak mechanism. It's just that the Doctor's TARDIS's cloaking device got stuck on Police Box and he's never been able to fix it (well except in one episode but it broke again.)
I did know that the cloak got stuck on the Police box shape, but I didn't know that that it was ever fixed, even for a single episode. Was there ever an episode that showed the Tardis's actual design shape. I know that the Master's Tardis can take on pretty much any shape. I have watched a fair amount of Dr. Who over the years, but I have never done much research on the history of the Tardis. After it was built, I wonder what it looked like and why was it built. Sounds like something for me to check out.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will there ever be a working/practical flying car? banquo's_bumble_puppy Science and Technology 77 20-March-2009 12:46 AM
BREAKING: Aircraft strikes NYC high-rise Cylinder Off-Topic Babbling 128 16-October-2006 05:54 PM
ISS, Big Dipper, Aircraft, & Meteor explodes Galactic2000 Astrophotography 24 14-October-2005 01:02 PM
Further on Wishstone rock. RGClark Astronomy 0 29-January-2005 09:01 AM
A mediocre spectacle: the collision of a space rock Argos Against the Mainstream 3 12-January-2002 02:15 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today