If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Small Media at Large
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-May-2008, 01:33 PM
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Posts: 3,467
Send a message via MSN to Sticks
Default Designing worlds for Sci-Fi / Fantasy

I just thought that with the collective wisdom here, then those of us who fancy themselves as writers, or those who think someone has made a booboo could come here to see if the world designed has any flaws in it's conception. I.e. it could not exist or would not be stable.

As for mine

The world would be an inhabited world with higher order life forms, orbiting a binary star system, which consists of two main sequence stars. (Sort of like Tatooine from the original 1979 Star Wars.) The planet would also have four small moons.

Would such a system be stable, and able to support life?
What would tides be like? Assume the moons have different orbit times.

If all the moons were to line up on the same side, would that be a problem

__________________
Van Rijn's original Invisible Elf was running for the North Carolina Senate, but dropped out of the contest after the paparazzi snapped him with a cute pixie just outside Disney World in Florida. Now he has settled down with her as they await their first child, writing his biography of life in Van Rijn's backyard, - Now you prove me wrong
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-May-2008, 06:39 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 6,783
Default

That's 'original 1977 Star Wars'.
__________________
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
"The only way to explore the universe is to go and look." - Brian Cox
Well, the best way to find out is to go there and, find out. - Raven's Cry
'Evolution and science are one thing, but you don’t mess with Yoko Ono. Everybody knows that. ' - 386sx
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-May-2008, 07:11 PM
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Posts: 3,467
Send a message via MSN to Sticks
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KaiYeves View Post
That's 'original 1977 Star Wars'.


I stand corrected

But could Tatooine have existed from the view point of orbital mechanics? I did read somewhere that they believe they had found binary star systems with stable planets.
__________________
Van Rijn's original Invisible Elf was running for the North Carolina Senate, but dropped out of the contest after the paparazzi snapped him with a cute pixie just outside Disney World in Florida. Now he has settled down with her as they await their first child, writing his biography of life in Van Rijn's backyard, - Now you prove me wrong
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-May-2008, 10:16 PM
Ilya's Avatar
Ilya Ilya is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,847
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post


I stand corrected

But could Tatooine have existed from the view point of orbital mechanics? I did read somewhere that they believe they had found binary star systems with stable planets.
Yes. Tatooine's two suns were only a few solar diameter apart, so Tatooine could comfortably orbit them both.
__________________
Fiction has to be plausible. Reality is under no such constraint.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-May-2008, 11:32 PM
mike alexander's Avatar
mike alexander mike alexander is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: People's Republic of Oregon
Posts: 5,610
Default

As for tides, they would depend in the size of the moons.
__________________
The Devil offered me power. I told him I preferred aperture.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 09:10 AM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 4,428
Default

Looking at the question of binary stars first; there appears to be two ways that you can have a planet in a stable orbit in a binary system.
(from this page )
http://www.solstation.com/habitable.htm
Quote:
Indeed, stable orbits may extend as far as one third of the closest separation between any two stars in a binary system, but according to NASA's Kepler Mission team, numerical integration models have shown that there is a range of orbital radii between about 1/3 and 3.5 times the stellar separation for which stable orbits around two stars are not possible
First the two stars might be close together in the centre of the system- a good rule of thumb is that the stars should be separated by no more than one third of the radius of the planet's orbit; for Earth that would be 1/3 AU, or a bit less than fifty million kilometers. In this case the planet would orbit both stars.

Or the second star could be separated from the first by more than 3.5 times the planet's orbital radius; for Earth that would be 3.5 AU, nearly as far as Jupiter. In this case the planet would only orbit one of the stars, not both - figure-of-eight orbits are almost impossible.

I'd add a safety margin to both of these figures - make the stars in the first case ten million kilometers closer together or so, and in the second case make the second star at least 4.5 AU distant- but that is up to you.

----------
As for the moons, there is an interesting thread here about multiple moons
Planet with two moons: double eclipse possible?

It looks like you could have at least two moons orbiting an Earth-like planet, although it would be a little difficult to explain how they were formed. One moon at 50 or 140 thousand kilometers, and one at 380 thousand kilometers seems to be stable. You could then add a single close-in asteroid-type moon, a bit like Phobos; note that this moon will eventually hit the planet. And for a fourth moon you could have a smallish retrograde moon at about 500,000 km or so, going the other way round the world.

Last edited by eburacum45 : 07-May-2008 at 10:09 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 10:03 AM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 4,428
Default

The tides from the two major moons in such a system would be interesting- the two smaller moons would probably have little effect, but the other two moons would each cause tides, which would periodically reinforce each other, and would also each be periodically reinforced by the central sun or suns.

Each time one of the two moons is aligned with the other, or with the two suns in the centre (which would act, most of the time, as if they were only one sun for tidal purposes) there would be a high tide. In the case where there is only one sun in the centre of the planet's orbit and another several AU distant, I suspect that the second sun would have little tidal effect.

Note that 'aligned with' means that the objects concerned form a line with the planet; they can both be on one side of the planet, or on opposite sides. An extra big tide would occur when the two moons were both aligned with the central sun or suns.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 11:30 AM
geonuc's Avatar
geonuc geonuc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 856
Default

Wouldn't the magnitude of the tides be significantly determined by the geography of your world? Earth has some monstrous oceans which are quite affected by the Moon. If your world had less water or smaller individual water bodies, the tides wouldn't be so big.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 11:43 AM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 4,428
Default

Absolutely. Even on Earth the Mediterreanean, a large land-locked sea, has no tides to speak of.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 01:55 PM
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Posts: 3,467
Send a message via MSN to Sticks
Default

This is quite good

As I went along with my "franchise" in the early days I was more concerned about the political make up - This world I created is actually situated in another membrane universe, but for strange unknown reasons the inhabitants were formed to be like the creatures and entities from the imagination, folk law, nightmares and collective unconsciousness of humans on Earth.

Somehow a number of the higher order intelligent beings became aware of the existance of Earth and humanity, and using what they considered "magic", (But as ever in this kind of thing never explained), they had constructed devices to travel between their universe and ours. In the earlier story lines I had it that some of the ancient gods humans worshiped were actually entities from the other world in human form. As time wore on and humanity grew up, the entities mostly returned to their world, although some stayed and the forces of law and order in the other world considered it a crime to further interfere in our world. A law, for storyline purposes was clearly honoured in the breach.

In the later storylines I did, I had a collusion of agencies from that world and secret Earth agencies to keep the existance of this alien world in another universe secret and to monitor those entities living among us (Men in Black - Shades of)

This franchise has been kind of going since 2001, but I ressurected it last year. Only in some of the more recent story lines was I turning to the geography, my next story line I am half thinking of definitely requires more thought given to how this world would actually work.

In terms of the binary star system, I thought of something like Tatooine from the original Star Wars, so the suns are close together and the world orbits both.

In terms of the moons, in one of the more recent story lines I had a description where three of the moons were in the night sky, but it would be a lot later in the night before the forth one appeared. eburacum45 idea is intriguing, with that set up, which would be the late moon one wonders, or perhaps over time each one would have turns of being late. One question, how would one get a retrograde moon, do any of our planets in the solar system have a moon that orbits backwards to others around the same planet?

As for formation, our moon is thought to be the result of a collision between two worlds where a larch chunk broke of and became the moon. Perhaps you could have this scenario, and then there was a further collision, either with the planet, or the moon.

So how did Larry Niven work out his Ring World?, I understand that he got quite a load of flack at a sci fi convention once by a rampaging mob of respectable physicists - or was that the inventor of the infinite improbability drive
__________________
Van Rijn's original Invisible Elf was running for the North Carolina Senate, but dropped out of the contest after the paparazzi snapped him with a cute pixie just outside Disney World in Florida. Now he has settled down with her as they await their first child, writing his biography of life in Van Rijn's backyard, - Now you prove me wrong
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 02:09 PM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 4,428
Default

Quote:
In terms of the moons, in one of the more recent story lines I had a description where three of the moons were in the night sky, but it would be a lot later in the night before the forth one appeared. eburacum45 idea is intriguing, with that set up, which would be the late moon one wonders, or perhaps over time each one would have turns of being late.
They would all take turns. The second moon, at 50K would be interesting- it would orbit the world in about a day and a half, so would move quite quickly against the fixed stars, but relatively slowly across the sky. Its motion would look quite different to anything we normally see from Earth.
The fastest moon would be the innermost- you could probably see it move quite easily.
Quote:
One question, how would one get a retrograde moon, do any of our planets in the solar system have a moon that orbits backwards to others around the same planet?
Retrograde moons have to be captured, I believe; more than half of Jupiter's satellites are retrograde. Having two or three other moons makes the capture process slightly more feasible, if I recall correctly.

Last edited by eburacum45 : 07-May-2008 at 02:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2008, 08:11 PM
AndreasJ's Avatar
AndreasJ AndreasJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Linköping, Sweden
Posts: 181
Send a message via ICQ to AndreasJ Send a message via Skype™ to AndreasJ
Default

Note that a small captured moon at 500,000 km away would be visible only as a starlike dot.
__________________
The other Shaltanac's joopleberry shrub is always a more mauve-y shade of pinky russet
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 07:29 PM
ngc3314's Avatar
ngc3314 ngc3314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 87.5W 33.2N
Posts: 1,364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eburacum45 View Post
Retrograde moons have to be captured, I believe; more than half of Jupiter's satellites are retrograde. Having two or three other moons makes the capture process slightly more feasible, if I recall correctly.
Captured it may be, but Triton is a counterexample to retrograde moons usually being small. The dynamics of intermingling sizeable direct and retrograde moons cannot fail to be interesting...
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2008, 12:54 AM
ravens_cry's Avatar
ravens_cry ravens_cry is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 947
Default

I found this on Elfwood, and while I have yet to use it personally, reading it through really gave me a lot of ideas. Hope it helps. http://www.elfwood.com/farp/thewriti...ergworlds.html
__________________
"The Internet is really, really great..."
Avenue Q
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2008, 01:26 AM
grant hutchison grant hutchison is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
So how did Larry Niven work out his Ring World?, I understand that he got quite a load of flack at a sci fi convention once by a rampaging mob of respectable physicists - or was that the inventor of the infinite improbability drive
His physics was good; a neat hybrid of the Dyson sphere and the rotating habitat. The "flak" came from MIT students at the 1970 World Science Fiction Convention, who pointed out that he hadn't explored the (in)stability of Ringworld's rotation around its sun.

Grant Hutchison
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2008, 05:46 AM
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Posts: 3,467
Send a message via MSN to Sticks
Default

And he would have gotten away with it had it not been for those pesky meddling MIT students
__________________
Van Rijn's original Invisible Elf was running for the North Carolina Senate, but dropped out of the contest after the paparazzi snapped him with a cute pixie just outside Disney World in Florida. Now he has settled down with her as they await their first child, writing his biography of life in Van Rijn's backyard, - Now you prove me wrong
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2008, 05:51 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 6,783
Default

Quote:
And he would have gotten away with it had it not been for those pesky meddling MIT students
Come to think of it, that's probably where Velma did go.
__________________
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
"The only way to explore the universe is to go and look." - Brian Cox
Well, the best way to find out is to go there and, find out. - Raven's Cry
'Evolution and science are one thing, but you don’t mess with Yoko Ono. Everybody knows that. ' - 386sx
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2008, 08:16 PM
timb timb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 50
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eburacum45 View Post
Looking at the question of binary stars first; there appears to be two ways that you can have a planet in a stable orbit in a binary system.
(from this page )
http://www.solstation.com/habitable.htm


First the two stars might be close together in the centre of the system- a good rule of thumb is that the stars should be separated by no more than one third of the radius of the planet's orbit; for Earth that would be 1/3 AU, or a bit less than fifty million kilometers. In this case the planet would orbit both stars.

Or the second star could be separated from the first by more than 3.5 times the planet's orbital radius; for Earth that would be 3.5 AU, nearly as far as Jupiter. In this case the planet would only orbit one of the stars, not both - figure-of-eight orbits are almost impossible.

I'd add a safety margin to both of these figures - make the stars in the first case ten million kilometers closer together or so, and in the second case make the second star at least 4.5 AU distant- but that is up to you.
That's pretty sound advice. A different sort of "binary" -- a Jovian class planet in the inner solar system -- is observationally quite common. The orbit of such an intruder has to meet conditions similar to but less stringent than those on a binary star for there to be stable planetary orbit in the habitable zone. If the gas giant itself is in the habitable zone then there's the possibility of its possessing a habitable moon.

Another thing to keep in mind is the life cycle of stars. Don't cast a late cycle degenerate star such as a white dwarf in any role but a very distant companion. Black holes and neutron stars are pretty much a no-no anywhere in a life-bearing system.

Quote:
Originally Posted by eburacum45 View Post
----------
As for the moons, there is an interesting thread here about multiple moons
Planet with two moons: double eclipse possible?

It looks like you could have at least two moons orbiting an Earth-like planet, although it would be a little difficult to explain how they were formed. One moon at 50 or 140 thousand kilometers, and one at 380 thousand kilometers seems to be stable. You could then add a single close-in asteroid-type moon, a bit like Phobos; note that this moon will eventually hit the planet. And for a fourth moon you could have a smallish retrograde moon at about 500,000 km or so, going the other way round the world.
In the solar system moons around terrestrial planets are uncommon and seem to be the result of "unusual" mechanisms such as asteroid capture (Phobos and Deimos) or mega-impact (Luna). I'm not sure that a captured moon would necessarily have a weird orbit: Phobos and Deimos have very vanilla (circular, prograde, low inclination) orbits.

If you like your moons' orbits weird the author could consider a pair of co-orbital moons. Retrograde orbits, high inclination orbits, and orbits at or below geosynchronous are all plausible ways to add variety. A debris disk could substitute for a really close in moon.

I've noticed that when people design worlds they usually make it just like Earth only better: more moons, more suns, a bigger planet, a brighter night sky etc. Don't over do it.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2008, 09:33 PM
m1omg's Avatar
m1omg m1omg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,289
Default