Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 18-January-2006, 03:03 PM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,053
Question Stardust and Genesis

A year ago, the Genesis probe made a bad landing on its return to Earth. It should have been picked up on air by an aircraft, but the procedure failed, and the probe crashed. Days ago, Stardust's sample capsule managed to make a successful landing all by itself.
What explains the different outcomes of the two missions? Would it have been safer for Genesis to use the same landing procedure as Stardust?
__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire.
"All your bias are belong to us" Ara Pacis.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 18-January-2006, 03:16 PM
phunk's Avatar
phunk phunk is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 868
Default

The difference is that the parachute failed to open on genesis, and worked correctly on stardust. The air capture wouldn't have been a problem if the chute had opened.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 18-January-2006, 03:16 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is online now
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 26,038
Default

The Genesis collection system was much more fragile than the Stardust collection system because of the different types of particles being collected. From the Genesis return press kit:

Quote:
The prizes Burnett and company are waiting for are hexagonal-wafers of pure silicon,
gold, sapphire, diamond and other materials that have served as a celestial prison for
their samples of solar wind particles. These wafers have weathered 26-plus months in
deep space and are now safely stowed in the return capsule. If the capsule were to
descend all the way to the ground, some might fracture or break away from their
mountings. Hence, the mid-air retrieval by helicopter, with crew including pilots who
have performed helicopter stunt work for Hollywood.
Stardust was trying to collect larger particles from a comet's tail, as contrasted with the solar wind ions that Genesis was trying to collect. So Stardust used aerogel while Genesis used specially prepared, high-purity wafers of solid but easily breakable material.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 18-January-2006, 03:16 PM
pumpkinpie's Avatar
pumpkinpie pumpkinpie is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,011
Default

Why wasn't there an air capture for Stardust?
edit: posted before I read ToSeek's post. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today