Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 12-April-2006, 06:36 PM
Grey's Avatar
Grey Grey is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afterburner
So what exactly does the electromagnetic frequency represent? actual movement of a photon in Hz? Example: x-rays 3x10^17 - 3x10^19 Hz
No, not actual movement. It's how quickly the electromagnetic field switches back and forth as you watch the wave go by.
__________________
Conserve energy. Commute with the Hamiltonian.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 12-April-2006, 11:10 PM
ngeo ngeo is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Glacier, Washington
Posts: 330
Default

Afterburner, may I ask where you got the number for "neutron oscillation frequency"?
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 13-April-2006, 12:54 AM
afterburner's Avatar
afterburner afterburner is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 426
Default

ngeo, i believe it was from this paper.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 14-April-2006, 04:00 PM
ngeo ngeo is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Glacier, Washington
Posts: 330
Default

Thank you afterburner, that is an interesting link. I see it is being aired on the ATM forum.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 16-April-2006, 04:01 PM
afterburner's Avatar
afterburner afterburner is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 426
Default

That is correct ngeo
dont mean to resurrect this thread, but i thought these questions fit here (they are photon-related)

When a photon slows down becasue its moving through a non vacuum, do other photons(that ARE moving through a vacuum) pass it at the speed of light? or by the amount that the original photon slowed down?

In the Big Bang theory, space-time was born at the moment of the "explosion", and began expanding. Im assuming that lots of photons were "born" at this moment or not much after the explosion. Is this corect?
Assuming the BB happened 13.5 billion ears ago, the diameter of the universe should be 13.5 billion light years. Is this a correct assumption?
Now, assuming that the volume WAS expanded by these photons, or other similar particles (i dont know if thats what the theory says, thats why im only assuming) then does that mean that the "space" in between photons/particles was aslo "filled in"? Let me rephrase

if we assume that singularity was the "center", and all things moving away from this "center" at he speed of light are what expanded sace, would the areas in between these paticles be considered space awwell, even though nothing was present there yet? You see what i mean? or did scientists say that since "these two" particles are "this far away" at "this time" everything in between MUST be space aswell. (by the way, right now i have a mental image of a sea urchin as a universe)

Thanks
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today