Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2006, 12:23 PM
suntrack2's Avatar
suntrack2 suntrack2 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: living in a joint family on earth
Posts: 3,007
Default All viewable stars in the universe formed through black hole?

this was a question in my mind and hence asking here to get the answer.
may be the black holes are continuously reducing since they are giving birth to the new stars ?

can black hole give birth to a big galaxy?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg the formation.jpg (8.6 KB, 48 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2006, 01:54 PM
Darrrius Darrrius is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 174
Default

Hi Suntrack


Stars are born when huge clouds of intersteller gas and dust collapse under their own weight and fragment into pieces.

http://astrosun2.astro.cornell.edu/a...star_birth.htm here is a link to a quick diagram on star birth

As far as i know, black holes do not have anything to do with star birth as such, but are tied in with the perhaps the formation of Galaxies, most of which (or all) have a Super Massive Black Hole at their centre.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2006, 03:15 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 25,997
Default

And there is a strong (and as yet unexplained) correlation between the size of the black hole and the mass of the galaxy.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2006, 03:19 PM
Hamlet's Avatar
Hamlet Hamlet is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by suntrack2
this was a question in my mind and hence asking here to get the answer.
may be the black holes are continuously reducing since they are giving birth to the new stars ?

can black hole give birth to a big galaxy?
Black holes aren't involved in star production. However, the supernovae that produce black holes are thought to be involved in triggering star formation. The shock wave from a supernova can compress gas clouds sufficiently to cause them to begin to collapse gravitationally.

Current theory suggests and observation supports the idea that many, if not all galaxies have a supermassive black hole (SMBH) at their centers. What isn't understood yet is whether the galaxy formed around the SMBH or whether the SMBH was born after the galaxy had formed.
__________________
"A mystic is a person who is puzzled before the obvious but who understands the nonexistent." -- Elbert Hubbard
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2006, 06:00 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin MA
Posts: 16,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek
there is a strong (and as yet unexplained) correlation between the size of the black hole and the mass of the galaxy.
I did see a reasonable explanation in a paper a couple years ago. The relationship is that the SMBH has about a tenth of a percent the mass of the central bulge of the galaxy. The rationale is that the central bulge formed in the early history of the galaxy in much the way that globular clusters form. This involves inbound material getting blown radially away by the fierce radiation of a new central star, but that material which can form gravitationally bound bodies such as stars, brown dwarfs, and smaller objects, will continue to fall in, and a small percentage of these will get absorbed into the central object.

This is far from proved, but it IS a mainstream explanation.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today