Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 27-June-2007, 06:36 PM
kordic kordic is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7
Default Question

Hey, what a great find, I love the show, I listen on my Palm Treo 700p, and it works great. Anyway, I would love to ask this question. This is of course a thought experiment. If I was around since the moment the big bang occurred. And I was propelled with the expansion along with space and time itself. How old would I be? I know my clocks would be ticking much slower, since I am traveling at the speed of light. Would I still be about 13.7 billion years old as the rest of the universe? Or would I be younger from the time dilation?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 27-June-2007, 06:43 PM
grant hutchison grant hutchison is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,621
Default

If you consider the subatomic particles of which you are composed, then you pretty much were around at the Big Bang, and followed the expansion of space thereafter. So you'd be 13.7 billion years old.

Grant Hutchison
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 28-June-2007, 02:31 AM
Tim Thompson's Avatar
Tim Thompson Tim Thompson is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,359
Default

Indeed, you would be 13.7 billion years old. Whenever an age of the universe is reported, that age is actually a proper time, that would be recorded by a clock moving along with the expansion of the universe. Nice thing about time dilation is that it always seems to nail somebody else's clock, but never your own, since you are always at rest with respect to your own clock.
__________________
The point of philosophy is to start with something so simple as not to seem worth stating, and to end with something so paradoxical that no one will believe it. -- Bertrand Russell
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 28-June-2007, 05:09 PM
Moonhead's Avatar
Moonhead Moonhead is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Netherlands, Europe
Posts: 239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Thompson View Post
Indeed, you would be 13.7 billion years old. Whenever an age of the universe is reported, that age is actually a proper time, that would be recorded by a clock moving along with the expansion of the universe. Nice thing about time dilation is that it always seems to nail somebody else's clock, but never your own, since you are always at rest with respect to your own clock.
Would there be a way to estimate (or maybe even calculate) the time that has passed on someone's clock who was around when the Big Bang occured but didn't move along with the expansion (if that were possible)?
__________________
Neptune, Titan, Stars can Frighten...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 28-June-2007, 06:03 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonhead View Post
[...] who was around when the Big Bang occured but didn't move along with the expansion[...]
That's not the Big Bang I know, that happened everywhere, where expansion is away from all points.

(Oh, and since I find myself in this thread: could the topic originator in the future please use titles more descriptive than "Question"? Be kinder to your readers. Thanks.)
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2007, 05:18 AM
kordic kordic is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7
Default

Thanks for all the answers guys. Yeah, that was my first post, and I am very excited to be here. When I ask a "question" in the future, I will be more descriptive. Is their a limit on how many questions I can ask? I have a "billion" more...Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 29-June-2007, 05:34 AM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kordic View Post
Thanks for all the answers guys. Yeah, that was my first post, and I am very excited to be here. When I ask a "question" in the future, I will be more descriptive. Is their a limit on how many questions I can ask? I have a "billion" more...Thanks
Ask away. And, welcome to the BAUT Forum.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Test your intelligence Titana Off-Topic Babbling 184 20-January-2007 09:23 PM
Apollo tracking stations - very specific amplifier question Nicolas Space Exploration 17 20-March-2006 09:28 PM
Question about the mass of our galaxy Jens Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers 8 30-October-2005 12:58 PM
A question for Arthur C Clarke The Watcher Astronomy 9 27-February-2004 01:34 AM
A dumb question about Arecibo DaveO Astronomy 9 26-May-2003 08:31 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today