Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 22-January-2008, 11:32 AM
gentle_dragon gentle_dragon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
It is possible for more detailed trajectory information, when projected into the future, to give different results while it has little short term effect. However, I am curious. You said in a previous post that the "MOID just changed from 0.0037 to 0.0012." Did you actually see this yourself on the site, or was that someone else's claim that you were repeating?
I've just seen different MOID data on different sites and dates and I jumped to conclusions It's still 0.0012501 on
http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=2007%20TU24;orb=1
and .00096 on
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/css/css_sss_newdisc.html
so it's still a bit puzzling.
Reply With Quote
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 22-January-2008, 11:50 AM
grant hutchison grant hutchison is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
You said in a previous post that the "MOID just changed from 0.0037 to 0.0012." Did you actually see this yourself on the site, or was that someone else's claim that you were repeating?
I certainly saw it myself, and at the same time gentle_dragon reported it. The JPL MOID estimate shifted from 0.0037 to 0.0012 (my rounding of their numbers, in each case) with the addition of the observation of 18 Jan.

Grant Hutchison
Reply With Quote
  #93 (permalink)  
Old 22-January-2008, 01:05 PM
Hydro's Avatar
Hydro Hydro is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: big thicket
Posts: 424
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gentle_dragon View Post
I've just seen different MOID data on different sites and dates and I jumped to conclusions It's still 0.0012501 on
http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=2007%20TU24;orb=1
and .00096 on
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/css/css_sss_newdisc.html
so it's still a bit puzzling.
Well, it's good that you have finally realized your error. I may have jumped to conclusions a bit myself, so forgive me for thinking that a newly registered poster, who has posted only in this thread (phrases like "dream on" and "now you do the math"), had a ulterior motive.
__________________
Scienara: A rejection of reason and evidence.
Reply With Quote
  #94 (permalink)  
Old 22-January-2008, 06:32 PM
gentle_dragon gentle_dragon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13
Default

Accepted I'm "junior" only on this forum In reality I'm very "senior" and I know something about "good" astronomy.
Reply With Quote
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 22-January-2008, 08:06 PM
Flapdragon Flapdragon is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2
Default

So what date is the Earth going to get hit by TU24?

I need to figure out when to plan my vacation. Thank you!
Reply With Quote
  #96 (permalink)  
Old 22-January-2008, 08:57 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grant hutchison View Post
I certainly saw it myself, and at the same time gentle_dragon reported it. The JPL MOID estimate shifted from 0.0037 to 0.0012 (my rounding of their numbers, in each case) with the addition of the observation of 18 Jan.

Grant Hutchison
Interesting, thanks. I hadn't seen it change, so it's good to have confirmation. I wasn't sure if it was just an idea that was passed around.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #97 (permalink)  
Old 22-January-2008, 09:03 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flapdragon View Post
So what date is the Earth going to get hit by TU24?
Not within the foreseeable future.

Quote:
I need to figure out when to plan my vacation. Thank you!
Go ahead and plan, but you can ignore 2007 TU24, unless you're planning to observe it by telescope on your vacation. Oh, and welcome to BAUT.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #98 (permalink)  
Old 22-January-2008, 09:27 PM
Mister Earl's Avatar
Mister Earl Mister Earl is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,121
Default

I went ahead and registered on the boards at TU24.org. Same name as here. Posted a rebuttal, basically rehashing what Mr. Plait has already said. (I did give him credit, of course! Also the site link).

Post:
http://www.tu24.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=139

Let's see if I get a proper discussion, of if they pull a truther response and just ban me. It'll be a good litmus test to see what their intentions are.
__________________
Tour of duty in Iraq completed. At home, fattening up, growing a beard.
Reply With Quote
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 22-January-2008, 09:28 PM
Flapdragon Flapdragon is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
Oh, and welcome to BAUT.
Mighty big thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #100 (permalink)  
Old 22-January-2008, 09:58 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,138
Default

I'm mildly curious what the TU24 board folks will do after the asteroid goes on its way. I wonder if they'll change their name (perhaps picking another "dangerous" asteroid), if they'll try to scare people with the idea that 2007 TU24 could hit on some future date, or if they'll just fade away in a few months.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 22-January-2008, 11:37 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,138
Default

Heh. This is amusing. In comments on BA's blog, the TU24 fellow said this:

If there are no effects from asteroids WD5 and TU24 by Feb 1, 2008, such as illustrated in my video, then I will personally donate $500 to support the Bad Astronomy website server or to a charity of your choice.

So, he's talking about "effects," not "impact." I have no doubt he'll latch onto bad weather somewhere, or other natural events that happen somewhere on the planet, every day, and declare these were somehow caused by the asteroid.

He also wonders why the news isn't covering this asteroid, hinting that it indicates a cover-up, rather than the obvious (it isn't news).
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser

Last edited by Van Rijn; 22-January-2008 at 11:58 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #102 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 12:21 AM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 10,024
Default

No, as the BA said, it is certainly not TU2 close 4 comfort. ;-)
__________________
I want to go back to the moon.
I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear.

"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
Reply With Quote
  #103 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 02:28 AM
Abbadon_2008's Avatar
Abbadon_2008 Abbadon_2008 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 471
Default

OK. Number-crunching aside....should I stock up on MREs and bottled water, and run like mad to wherever?

Or should I just keep my camera handy, and the VCR tuned to CNN to record a near miss?
__________________
Angel of the Abyss
-------------
"I am Ripper...Tearer...Slasher...Gouger. I am the Teeth in the Darkness, the Talons in the Night. Mine is Strength...and Lust...and Power! I AM BEOWULF!"
Reply With Quote
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 02:45 AM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbadon_2008 View Post
OK. Number-crunching aside....should I stock up on MREs and bottled water, and run like mad to wherever?
Certainly not for this asteroid.

Quote:
Or should I just keep my camera handy, and the VCR tuned to CNN to record a near miss?
If you have the camera tied to a good telescope, and you take some care to track it, go ahead. Otherwise, don't bother. Again: This thing will be over 500,000 km away.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #105 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 02:46 AM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbadon_2008 View Post
Or should I just keep my camera handy, and the VCR tuned to CNN to record a near miss?
What did you do January 13, 0913 UTC, when 2008 AF3 made its closest Earth approach of only about 0.98 LD (compared to 2007 TU24's much farther estimated 1.44 LD)?

Do the same.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #106 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 02:51 AM
Abbadon_2008's Avatar
Abbadon_2008 Abbadon_2008 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 471
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01101001 View Post
What did you do January 13, 0913 UTC, when 2008 AF3 made its closest Earth approach of only about 0.98 LD (compared to 2007 TU24's much farther estimated 1.44 LD)?

Do the same.
Actually, I did see a HUMONGOUS light in the sky a couple weeks back. Figured it might be Venus. But I'm not an astronomer.

I watched it for a while, and then made some nachos.
__________________
Angel of the Abyss
-------------
"I am Ripper...Tearer...Slasher...Gouger. I am the Teeth in the Darkness, the Talons in the Night. Mine is Strength...and Lust...and Power! I AM BEOWULF!"
Reply With Quote
  #107 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 04:33 AM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,451
Default

News: NASA JPL Near Earth Object Program: Near-Earth Asteroid 2007 TU24 to Pass Close to Earth on Jan. 29

Quote:
Should be Observable with Modest Sized Telescopes

Asteroid 2007 TU24, discovered by the Catalina Sky Survey on October 11, 2007 will closely approach the Earth to within 1.4 lunar distances (334,000 miles) on 2008 Jan. 29 08:33 UT. This object, between 150 and 600 meters in diameter, will reach an approximate apparent magnitude 10.3 on Jan. 29-30 before quickly becoming fainter as it moves further from Earth. For a brief time the asteroid will be observable in dark and clear skies with amateur telescopes of 3 inch apertures or larger.

[...]

Given the estimated number of near-Earth asteroids of this size (about 7,000 discovered and undiscovered objects), an object of this size would be expected to pass this close to Earth, on average, about every 5 years or so. The average interval between actual Earth impacts for an object of this size would be about 37,000 years. For the January 29th encounter, near Earth asteroid 2007 TU24 has no chance of hitting, or affecting, Earth.

2007 TU24 will be the closest currently known approach by a potentially hazardous asteroid of this size or larger until 2027. Plans have been made for the Goldstone planetary radar to observe this object Jan 23-24 and for the Arecibo radar to observe it Jan 27-28 and then Feb 1-4. High resolution radar imaging is expected, which may permit later 3-D shape reconstruction.
Wait. What was that again?

Quote:
For the January 29th encounter, near Earth asteroid 2007 TU24 has no chance of hitting, or affecting, Earth.
Some people must be so disappointed...

But, they can look forward to further manufactured fear, if that's what pleases them:

Quote:
[...] an object of this size would be expected to pass this close to Earth, on average, about every 5 years or so.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #108 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 05:24 PM
basichuman basichuman is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
Certainly not for this asteroid.



If you have the camera tied to a good telescope, and you take some care to track it, go ahead. Otherwise, don't bother. Again: This thing will be over 500,000 km away.
Hey Everyone,
Im claiming ignorance here and just want some expert perspective on this.

With TU24 listed as having a MOID of .0012501 AU and an AU being aprox 93,000,000... doesnt that mean the asteroid will only miss us by about 116,000 miles or 1/3 the distance to the moon?

I keep reading posts that it will miss us by much more.
Are my calculations off?

Seems like a miss of only 116,000 miles is pretty darn close and the MOID over time seems to have consistantly gone down as the rock got closer.

Could Earth's gravitational pull deminish the 116,000 mile gap?

Thanks in advance for any help understanding this.
It IS kind of scary if you don't understand these things.

basichuman
Reply With Quote
  #109 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 06:28 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,451
Default

Welcome to BAUT Forum, basichuman.

Quote:
Originally Posted by basichuman View Post
With TU24 listed as having a MOID of .0012501 AU and an AU being aprox 93,000,000... doesnt that mean the asteroid will only miss us by about 116,000 miles or 1/3 the distance to the moon?
No. No. No. It's been discussed here before.

MOID -- Minimal Orbital Intersection Distance -- is how close the orbits are. For a close approach to have the same distance during a pass, then both bodies have to be exactly in perfect position within their respective orbits. The odds of that are... astronomical. It's a worst-case sort of thing -- under the wildest of circumstances, if neither body is perturbed, how close could one object come to the other. People who point you at that figure either have no understanding of what its significance is, or are trying to scare you.

Please, if you are interested in watching progress, pay attention to the closest approach, or nominal distance, figure. It is, and has been, estimated at about 1.4 lunar distances now (sources: NASA/JPL press release: 1.4 LD; Traffic Report: 1.44 LD; NEODyS: 0.0037 AU). That's what matters for this pass. You really want to be concerned with how close it will come this time, not how close it might ever possibly come over all time.

As the List Of The Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHAs) says, I repeat:

Quote:
The quantity EMoid [Earth MOID] in the table below does not give any information on actual close approaches to the earth [...]
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #110 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 06:57 PM
ratcrud ratcrud is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Question 2007 tu24

it would be in the world governments best interest not to make an possible impact known.
think about it.
world wide panic.
prices would sky rocket on everything.
and all the rioting.
the results could be possible worse than the actual impact.
just a thought and my opinon only.
Reply With Quote
  #111 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 07:15 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ratcrud View Post
it would be in the world governments best interest not to make an possible impact known.
They can't stop independent observation and calculation of the orbit, so it's very hard to understand how they would keep it hidden, even if they wanted to.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #112 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 07:19 PM
ratcrud ratcrud is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Default

another Question about tu24.
how far south will we be able to observe tu24?
if clear weather down here in Texas I plan on trying to observe if possible
Reply With Quote
  #113 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 07:40 PM
basichuman basichuman is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Default

Thanks for the clarification.

Im still a bit murky on the terminology but appreciate the feedback. Puts my mind at ease to get an explanation from someone who understands this stuff and sees there is not an issue to be alarmed about.

Like I said, if you don't understand what you are looking at, reading or hearing it can APPEAR to be scary... or worse yet, it can be MADE to appear scary.

Thanks for the reply.

basichuman
Reply With Quote
  #114 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 07:57 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by basichuman View Post
Like I said, if you don't understand what you are looking at, reading or hearing it can APPEAR to be scary... or worse yet, it can be MADE to appear scary.

Thanks for the reply.
You're quite welcome. There are a bunch of people out there making false claims about an impending impact or insinuating same. Some probably just misunderstand the process, but I suspect some of them are sadistic and enjoy making people worry. Be careful.

I'm sure this isn't the last near-miss that will be hyped by careless and evil people. There will certainly be more, in months, more probably within some years. When they become news, and worried people ask, I hope we can just point to this topic (hello, people from the future, sent here to look back at the happy outcome of the 2007 TU24 close approach!) and say: "See what happened last time? The scaremongers were wrong. The astronomers were right. Who do you trust this time?"
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #115 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 08:36 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 17,744
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by basichuman View Post
Im still a bit murky on the terminology but appreciate the feedback. Puts my mind at ease to get an explanation from someone who understands this stuff and sees there is not an issue to be alarmed about.
Maybe this very rough analogy will help. Think of the orbits as lanes on a highway and the Earth or the asteroid as cars in those lanes. The MOID is sort of describing whether the lanes cross each other or not. But even if those lanes cross each other, you will only get a collision if the two cars (objects) happen to be in the intersection at the exact same time. In this case, they are not even very close.

And these are very long lanes, there is only one car in each, and compared to the length of the highway, these are pretty small cars.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
  #116 (permalink)  
Old 23-January-2008, 09:00 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ratcrud View Post
how far south will we be able to observe tu24?
If you trust the NASA JPL news release, there is a star map there showing that at its brightest, 2007 TU24 is moving from Camelopardalis to Ursa Major. I'm pretty sure you can see them in Texas, but doublecheck a map for the hours you'll observe (like Fourmilab).
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #117 (permalink)  
Old 24-January-2008, 06:48 AM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,451
Default

Wikipedia: 2007 TU24

Quote:
From the date of discovery of asteroid 2007 TU24 on 11 October 2007, total 104 observations of this asteroid are made until 18 January 2008 spanning 99 days. Trajectory of this asteroid is well defined and hence this asteroid was removed from 'current impact risks' page of NASA website on 4 December 2007 at 14:05 UTC. That means that NASA has completely ruled out any earth impact possibility at least for next 100 years.
NASA JPL (Asteroid Radar Research) 2007 TU24 Planning

Quote:
Apart from its absolute visual magnitude (H = 20.1, implying a
diameter ~0.3 km if it has a typical S-class albedo), nothing is known
about TU24's physical properties, but the expected echo
signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) almost certainly will suffice for
high-resolution imaging using Arecibo or Goldstone.

Goldstone observations are scheduled on January 23 and Arecibo observations are
scheduled on January 27-28 and February 1-4. Note that Goldstone observations straddle
the January 23-24 date boundary.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #118 (permalink)  
Old 24-January-2008, 08:22 AM
astromark's Avatar
astromark astromark is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Zealand.
Posts: 3,477
Angry NO! Ratcrud; No.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ratcrud View Post
it would be in the world governments best interest not to make an possible impact known.
think about it.
world wide panic.
prices would sky rocket on everything.
and all the rioting.
the results could be possible worse than the actual impact.
just a thought and my opinion only.
If any significant impact event were to be detected they ( those people that run this alleged world government.) Would not be able to suppress the scientific community into silence. Not ever, no way.
The information network that we are using right now has made this planet a much easy'r place to find things out about.
People generally are appalling at keeping a secret.
Informed opinion and better data will be our friend not our enemy.
You tell us to think about it... Well, we have. Follow the science not the so sayer.
Reply With Quote
  #119 (permalink)  
Old 24-January-2008, 08:29 AM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth, Texas
Posts: 13,391
Send a message via Yahoo to Neverfly
Default

That was my first response too Astromark. I was no longer posting at that time- but a change has inspired me to post away so...

What World Government!? Did something happen that I'm totally unaware of?

Next, there are way too many astronomers, private astronomers and amateur astronomers looking at the skys to keep an impactor a secret.

The "panic" thing is purely a Hollywood gimic.

Observe the reality: They are always informing the public about stuff. The government spends very little time thinking about how to not tell something but how to handle the press release about it.

Aside from Botched jobs, the government is really quick to warn people of danger, initialize evacuations and take whatever measures necessary to ensure civil safety. Why? Imagine how many heads would roll if they did NOT do so.
Reply With Quote
  #120 (permalink)  
Old 24-January-2008, 10:09 AM
tusenfem's Avatar
tusenfem tusenfem is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Graz, Austria
Posts: 3,256
Send a message via Yahoo to tusenfem
Default

Wowie! the sensationalist Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf has TU24 already upgraded to a SMALL PLANET!!!!!! (text in Dutch)
Maybe there is life on TU24, just like the little ole lady of Mars :-)
__________________

Any comments in glorious red are to be considered in ModeratorMode.


善數, 不用籌策 (shàn shù, bù yòng chóu cè)
He who is good at counting, uses no counting tools
“A good scientist has freed himself of concepts and keeps his mind open to what is”
道德經, 二十七 (dào dé jīng, 27)

Last edited by tusenfem; 24-January-2008 at 10:31 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.bautforum.com/space-astronomy-questions-answers/68964-asteroid-tu24-close.html
Posted By For Type Date
Asteroid TU24 Damages in relation to Earth on Jan. 29th this Year. (One Week Away) - Page 2 - Community This thread Refback 22-January-2008 01:55 AM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The ULTIMATE astronomy quiz Glom Astronomy 4699 01-September-2009 05:12 AM
Is 1 Ceres still an Asteroid? (Wiki & IAU) kheider Astronomy 28 15-October-2006 10:14 AM
'Asteroid' TV movie kylenano Small Media at Large 2 26-December-2004 07:21 PM
Asteroid Too Close? Chip Astronomy 17 02-June-2004 09:02 AM
Discussion: Amateur Spots Close Passing Asteroid Fraser Universe Today Story Comments 2 23-January-2004 04:42 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today