Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-September-2008, 07:05 PM
tommac's Avatar
tommac tommac is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,584
Default Microscopic Black hole question

If a microscopic black hole colided with a supermassive object, much larger and massive that it was what would happen?

There are more questions to this ... but here is what I am thinking.

Lets say there was an object that was almost a black hole in density but not quite.

If that collided with a much more massive object it would just combine with the massive objects mass and that is it.

However it seems that if it becomes a black hole then all of a sudden it is magical and has magical properties.

In reality this object is really just a dense object that has very unique properties because of the amount it warps space time.

Near a much more massive object however wouldnt the more massive object have an equal amount of attractive force? Couldnt a very massive object disinigrate a microscopic black hole? The energy/mass of a microscopic black hole shouldnt have an effect on a massive object.

Say on the surface of the sun if a microscopic black hole was created I would think the gravity there should be able to disinigrate something that was almost a black hole ( denser than the sun but not dense enough to curve space more than the speed of light ) and something that was a black hole.

When you add the mass of the sun to the mass of a microscopic black hole and then take the volume of the sun the combined densities would not be enough to create a state that would be a black hole would it?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-September-2008, 08:40 PM
korjik korjik is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,221
Default

You really didnt have to create a new thread to add the word microscopic to the title. Please reference the other thread
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-September-2008, 05:39 PM
tommac's Avatar
tommac tommac is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,584
Default

This was done by the board. The board is slow and created a duplicate thread. When it wasnt saving I added the word microscopic.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-September-2008, 05:46 PM
Lepton Lepton is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Center of the universe
Posts: 793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tommac View Post
This was done by the board. The board is slow and created a duplicate thread. When it wasnt saving I added the word microscopic.
Can't you accept responsibility for any of your actions? Even if the board was slow fact is you submitted two threads.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-September-2008, 06:03 PM
tusenfem's Avatar
tusenfem tusenfem is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Graz, Austria
Posts: 3,133
Send a message via Yahoo to tusenfem
Default

MODERATOR

Please merge the two threads, or close this one.
__________________

Any comments in glorious red are to be considered in ModeratorMode.


善數, 不用籌策 (shàn shù, bù yòng chóu cè)
He who is good at counting, uses no counting tools
“A good scientist has freed himself of concepts and keeps his mind open to what is”
道德經, 二十七 (dào dé jīng, 27)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-September-2008, 07:03 PM
korjik korjik is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,221
Default

close please. there is no reason to merge
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-September-2008, 02:34 AM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 12,278
Default

Agreed.

Please close.

Thanks.
__________________
If I set the budget, we'd have Ares and more. Unfortunately, I don't set the budget, and Ares is just too expensive and too far out for us to accomplish our goals within the budget we were given.

If we halt the ISS, all versions of Ares, and transport Orion and Altair aboard DIRECTv3's Jupiter family of Shuttle-Derived Launch Vehicles, we just might make it back to the Moon by 2020.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
white holes and red shift tommac Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers 60 26-June-2008 04:43 PM
Answers JukriS Against the Mainstream 78 17-November-2007 12:14 AM
The Universe: A Black Hole in Search of Its Singularity? thothicabob Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers 19 21-August-2007 09:44 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today