Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-November-2008, 05:44 PM
Grashtel Grashtel is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 830
Default Wdith of the Sun's habitable zone?

I'm trying to find out how wide the Sun's habitable zone is and am not having much luck with Google or Wikipedia. Can anyone here help me?
__________________
"Any Sufficiently Analyzed Magic is Indistinguishable from SCIENCE!" -Agatha Heterodyne

"Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it." -Florence Ambrose
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-November-2008, 06:46 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,453
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grashtel View Post
I'm trying to find out how wide the Sun's habitable zone is [...]
It varies by estimator and the estimator's definition of habitable zone.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-November-2008, 07:16 PM
Rhaedas's Avatar
Rhaedas Rhaedas is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 180
Default

Wikipedia's definition (and likely others) is based on 1 AU from a star with the sun's luminosity. The zone's width is from .95 to 1.37 of this mean average.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-November-2008, 08:45 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,453
Default

Welcome to BAUT Forum, Rhaedas.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhaedas View Post
[...] and likely others [...].
I have seen other different definitions. I'm sorry: my main point, I shall now make explicit, was that Grashtel could make an answer more reliable by defining the thing for which the feature statistic is sought.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-November-2008, 10:12 PM
timb's Avatar
timb timb is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhaedas View Post
Wikipedia's definition (and likely others) is based on 1 AU from a star with the sun's luminosity. The zone's width is from .95 to 1.37 of this mean average.
1 is not the mean or average of .95 and 1.37. The Wikipedia editors are stuck on the notion that Earth's current orbit must be at the center of the Sun's habitable zone, which causes them to use some misleading language.

The 0.95 to 1.37 comes from planetary climate models that suggest an Earth-like planet would surely experience a runaway greenhouse if it were closer than 0.95 AU and a CO2 freeze-out if it were further than 1.37 AU.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2008, 10:51 AM
Eroica's Avatar
Eroica Eroica is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dubh Linn
Posts: 3,876
Default

In the 1990s James Kasting used various criteria to determine the long-term habitable zone around a Sun-like main-sequence star (ie the zone that would remain habitable for the first 4.6 billion years of the star's main-sequence lifetime).

The inner edge is the distance at which liquid water would be broken down to hydrogen and oxygen by photolysis and so be lost from an Earthlike planet. He set this at 0.95 AU.

Two different criteria were used to estimate the outer edge of the habitable zone. One gives the point at which CO2 starts to condense out of the atmosphere: 1.37 AU. The other gives the point at which there could still be enough water vapour and CO2 in the atmosphere to make an Earthlike planet habitable by means of the greenhouse effect: 1.67 AU.
__________________
- Learn a lot teaching others.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Martian habitable zone: marsbug Life in Space 14 02-October-2008 07:50 PM
Habitable zone Damburger Life in Space 16 22-December-2005 08:49 PM
HD 28185 exoplanet habitable? astro_kct Astronomy 42 12-October-2004 11:07 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today