Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 16-December-2008, 01:33 PM
stitt29 stitt29 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 116
Default atomic clocks and spacetime

Hi

You know how Atomic clocks in orbit have to be reset because bending spacetime or something. What is actually happening? Do the clocks go slower (or faster) in a weaker gravitational field? Is the difference the result of atomic decay being variable in differing gravitational fields?
Also if there is a time difference( say between a clock on Earth and one in orbit) if we were to physically move the clocks so they met in the same gravitational field i.e. the surface of the Earth would the clocks right themselves and become synchronous?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 16-December-2008, 01:46 PM
StupendousMan's Avatar
StupendousMan StupendousMan is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stitt29 View Post

You know how Atomic clocks in orbit have to be reset because bending spacetime or something. What is actually happening? Do the clocks go slower (or faster) in a weaker gravitational field? Is the difference the result of atomic decay being variable in differing gravitational fields?
A clock in weak gravitational field will run more quickly than one in a strong gravitational field, all other things being equal. Atoms will decay more quickly in a weak gravitational field. People will age more quickly in a weak gravitational field. Time just runs more quickly in a weak gravitational field.

Quote:
Also if there is a time difference( say between a clock on Earth and one in orbit) if we were to physically move the clocks so they met in the same gravitational field i.e. the surface of the Earth would the clocks right themselves and become synchronous?
If you put the clocks side-by-side in the same place, they will run at the same rate. Any differences in their settings will remain, however.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 16-December-2008, 04:48 PM
sabianq's Avatar
sabianq sabianq is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 786
Default

Are you thinking about the GPS Navigation System?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System

in the case of the GPS system, there are at least 4 satellites are always visible from any position on the Earth at any given time (with up to 12 visible).
The satellites each carries an atomic clock that has an accuracy of roughly 1 nanosecond in a given amount of time.

GPS receiver determines its current heading and position by comparing the time signals it picks up from the GPS satellites in orbit. By triangulating on the known positions of the GPS satellites, the receiver can know its positional information with ultra high precision.

in order for this to work, the clock in the GPS satellites must be known to an accuracy within 20 to 30 nanoseconds. Now, because the satellites are constantly moving in relation to people on the ground and each other, there is a discrepancy between the clocks. Special and General theories of Relativity must be taken into account to make sure the clocks stay within acceptable synchronization tolerances.

when looking at a satellite in orbit from the ground, the satellites are in motion relative to the observer (or vice-versa) Special Relativity predicts that we should observe the satellites clocks ticking slower than ours on the ground.
http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/.../Unit5/sr.html
Special Relativity predicts that the clocks on the satellites should fall behind clocks on the ground by roughly 7 microseconds per day. This is because they are ticking slower due to the effects of time dilation due to their relitive motion.


also
satellites in high orbit, like the GPS satellites where the Earth's gravitational field is less than it is at the Earth's surface, General Relativity is asserted and shows that clocks that are on the earths surface will tick away more slowly than the satellites the higher orbits further away from earths gravitational field. and the clocks in orbit will tick faster than the clocks on the ground.
http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/...lackholes.html

when using General Relativity to calculate the clocks in GPS satellites, it is found that the clocks in the high orbit satellite should move ahead of ground-based clocks by ~45 microseconds per day.

when one combines the two relativistic effects where special relativity says that the clocks will tick slower and general relativity says that the clocks will tick faster than the ground based clocks, it is found that the clocks on-board the satellites should tick faster than identical clocks on the ground by about ~38 microseconds per day (45-7=38).

sounds small, but when a system that needs nanosecond information where 38 microseconds is 38,000 nanoseconds, If these effects are not taken into account properly, a navigational position based on the GPS satellite constellation would be in error after 2 minutes. The errors would accumulate to about 10 kilometers per day.

http://www.losangeles.af.mil/library...et.asp?id=5311

Link removed

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects...ativity_on_GPS
__________________

-work in progress--
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 16-December-2008, 05:06 PM
sabianq's Avatar
sabianq sabianq is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stitt29 View Post
Hi

Is the difference the result of atomic decay being variable in differing gravitational fields?
Also if there is a time difference( say between a clock on Earth and one in orbit) if we were to physically move the clocks so they met in the same gravitational field i.e. the surface of the Earth would the clocks right themselves and become synchronous?
assume this, you and your friend have identical synchronized atomic clocks. you are on board the satellite with your atomic clock. and you friend is on the ground with his atomic clock. both you and him are staring at each others atomic clock with a telescope.

General Relativity shows that when you look at your friends clock back on earth through your telescope from orbit, his clock is moving slower than yours. He is seeing that your clock is moving faster.
the gravitational field of earth is stronger at your friends location which actually makes the frequency of time move slower. so his clock is ticking away slower than yours.

when you meet up with each other and compare the clocks, you will see that his clock setting is indeed different than your clock. while together at the same location again the clocks are ticking away at the same speed, your clock shows that more time has passed.

in Special Relativity, the difference is due to relative motion. taking the gravitational aspect away, if you are just looking at each others clocks and are not moving relative to each other, the clocks will stay synchronized.
but as the two of you move in relation to each other, you will notice each others clocks slow down as compared to each others.
__________________

-work in progress--
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 16-December-2008, 05:58 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 12,547
Default

Good detail, Sabianq.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stitt29 View Post
Hi

You know how Atomic clocks in orbit have to be reset because bending spacetime or something. What is actually happening? Do the clocks go slower (or faster) in a weaker gravitational field?
A weaker gravitational field causes them to go faster, but their orbital velocity causes them to go slower.

Quote:
Also if there is a time difference( say between a clock on Earth and one in orbit) if we were to physically move the clocks so they met in the same gravitational field i.e. the surface of the Earth would the clocks right themselves and become synchronous?
No. For the GPS system the various computers keep track of the ongoing cumulative error, and that error is taken into account during all calculations. Last time I checked, it was about 29 seconds, total, since they launched the fleet nearly two decades ago.
__________________
If I set the budget, we'd have Ares and more. Unfortunately, I don't set the budget, and Ares is just too expensive and too far out for us to accomplish our goals within the budget we were given.

If we halt the ISS, all versions of Ares, and transport Orion and Altair aboard DIRECTv3's Jupiter family of Shuttle-Derived Launch Vehicles, we just might make it back to the Moon by 2020.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 27-December-2008, 04:27 PM
swansont swansont is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Washington, DC USA
Posts: 1,496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mugaliens View Post
No. For the GPS system the various computers keep track of the ongoing cumulative error, and that error is taken into account during all calculations. Last time I checked, it was about 29 seconds, total, since they launched the fleet nearly two decades ago.
The clocks are continually re-synched. What is the 29 seconds to which you are referring?
__________________
"I have a cunning plan that cannot fail."
S. Baldrick
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 27-December-2008, 11:08 PM
Tensor Tensor is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sarasota Fl
Posts: 3,685
Default

Long time no see, swansont. Good to see you back.
__________________
Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend,... - Moody Blues.

Neptune- The original Dark Matter.

The author feels that this technique of deliberately lying will actually make it easier for you to learn the ideas. - Donald Knuth
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 28-December-2008, 12:23 AM
swansont swansont is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Washington, DC USA
Posts: 1,496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tensor View Post
Long time no see, swansont. Good to see you back.
Thanks. Work's been keeping me busy, but I'm now on vacation, so I decided to drop in.
__________________
"I have a cunning plan that cannot fail."
S. Baldrick
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A quantum theory of gravity Uclock Against the Mainstream 386 05-March-2007 11:19 AM
Time Dilation madman Against the Mainstream 153 22-December-2005 12:30 AM
How to straighten Spacetime snowflakeuniverse Against the Mainstream 20 20-June-2005 06:11 AM
Black Holes: Has anyone fallen into 1? AgentStar1234 Astronomy 20 15-November-2003 01:19 PM
Quantum question...sorta Savanna513 Astronomy 26 30-March-2002 09:11 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today