Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

View Poll Results: Is faster than light travel possible?
No, it is not possible. 65 57.02%
Yes, it is possible but humanity will never acheive it. 11 9.65%
Yes, it is possible and we could discover it within 10 years. 4 3.51%
Yes, it is possible and we may discover it in 100 years. 17 14.91%
Yes, it is possible but it could take thousands of years for us to discover it (or longer). 17 14.91%
Voters: 114. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #391 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2009, 05:04 PM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Default

Since I'm new to this discussion, I don't know if this has already been mentioned, but the only way I can see FTL travel being possible is if the theoretical particle, the tachyon, first proposed by physicist Arnold Sommerfeld, turned out to be real. I have read that if such a class of particles were to exist, it might be possible using an electro-magnetic field to surround a spaceship with tachyons and remove the ship from "normal" space and inject it into the hyperspace in between branes. Since the tachyon has a speed minimum of the speed of light and has the odd property of speeding up as it loses energy, it is conceivable that instantaneous travel over vast distances would be possible. The only problem is how do you know where to re-enter normal space? I mean you don't want to end up inside of a star. Another problem that arises is that if tachyons are real, then that would cause serious problems for special relativity.

Mind you, these are just musings of mine in the vane in which I interpret this discussion.

Eric
__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site
Reply With Quote
  #392 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2009, 05:21 PM
danscope's Avatar
danscope danscope is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: R.I.
Posts: 2,593
Default

There does not exist an energy source capable of accelerating itself and
it's enclosure (ship) to anything like 1 % of light speed . For many reasons.
And you are wise to consider the problems of astrogation, another little detail
to be considered.
Best regards,

Dan
Reply With Quote
  #393 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2009, 05:29 PM
EricFD's Avatar
EricFD EricFD is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danscope View Post
There does not exist an energy source capable of accelerating itself and
it's enclosure (ship) to anything like 1 % of light speed . For many reasons.
And you are wise to consider the problems of astrogation, another little detail
to be considered.
Best regards,

Dan
Yes, astrogation would be a rather difficult problem to tackle, to say the least! LOL

Eric
__________________
“Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned like a liberation.” - Albert Einstein

My Astronomy Site
My Geology Site
Reply With Quote
  #394 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2009, 06:51 PM
PetersCreek's Avatar
PetersCreek PetersCreek is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peters Creek, Alaska
Posts: 2,923
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kjavds View Post
So sorry to offend your anal sense of compartmentalization, sir.

Ooh! Is that an infraction? Ruler, ruler; where did I put that ruler -
I'll make it official. kjavds, if you have not already done so, please take the time to familiarize yourself with the rules of this board, linked in my signature line below. Religion may only be discussed within the narrow parameters defined in our rules. Your post did not qualify. Further, our rules require civility. Your follow up post also did not qualify.

As to the other respondents, thank you for your concern but please, report problem posts rather than attempt to moderate them yourself.
__________________
Brett
Peters Creek, Alaska
─────────────────────────────────────────────
My moderation comments will appear in this color.
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄ Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice
Reply With Quote
  #395 (permalink)  
Old 04-November-2009, 07:40 PM
IsaacKuo's Avatar
IsaacKuo IsaacKuo is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danscope View Post
There does not exist an energy source capable of accelerating itself and it's enclosure (ship) to anything like 1 % of light speed.
This is untrue. An antimatter pion rocket may be good to perhaps 30% of lightspeed. Thermonuclear bomb based Orion style rockets may be good to perhaps 10% of light speed. Even pure fission based rockets may be good to perhaps 3% of light speed.

It's also not necessary for an energy source to accelerate itself in order to be useful. A large relativistic particle beam drone, for example, could be used to accelerate a much smaller starship.
Reply With Quote
  #396 (permalink)  
Old 06-November-2009, 01:35 AM
Starfury Starfury is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 173
Default

I said possible, but not for thousands of years. The Alcubierre warp drive and generating wormholes are theoretically possible. However, it may be thousands of years or more before we could have the engineering know-how to put theory into practice, and be able to generate the titanic amounts of energy needed to power either system.

In the near term, our best option for interstellar travel will likely be some sort of fusion powered rocket that could accelerate to 10, maybe 20 percent the speed of light.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Faster Than Light Travel Trivial Pursuit Astronomy 38 21-July-2007 09:38 PM
What if one could travel faster than the speed of light? Himanshu Raj Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers 13 16-January-2007 02:46 PM
What if one could travel faster than the speed of light? Himanshu Raj Against the Mainstream 1 14-January-2007 07:30 PM
Which is more likely: Faster Than Light travel or artificial gravity? parallaxicality Science and Technology 13 06-December-2005 07:06 AM
Scientists get light to travel faster than...light? Kemal Off-Topic Babbling 6 22-August-2005 05:18 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today