Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-May-2002, 04:24 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,224
Default

For every astronomer who uses the telescope, eight more are turned away. Hubble has not seen that kind of demand since it first launched in 1990.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-May-2002, 04:42 PM
rsa rsa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 36
Default

From your link.
Quote:
It costs about $200 million a year to maintain Hubble, so having both Next Generation Space Telescope and Hubble operating at the same time would be costly, and therefore unlikely.
It seems to me that it would be well worth $200 million a year to keep Hubble going along with the NGST. What a waste to decommision the HST.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-May-2002, 06:28 PM
Azpod Azpod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hollyweird, CA
Posts: 197
Default

Quote:
On 2002-05-01 12:42, rsa wrote:
It seems to me that it would be well worth $200 million a year to keep Hubble going along with the NGST. What a waste to decommision the HST.
I couldn't agree more. Granted, the HST should be decommisioned at some point, but there should be overlap of a few years between the HST and the NGST, where astronomers who can't get time on the NGST may get a decent crack at time on the HST. Also, the HST and the NGST could do observations of the same object to try to resolve planets or other such exteremely faint objects that would be difficult for either one to resolve on its own.
__________________
If E = MC<sup>2</sup>, why do I have less energy the more mass my body acquires?
That is all.

--Azpod... Formerly known as James Justin
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today