Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2002, 05:27 PM
David Hall David Hall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 2,689
Default

Interesting, amusing, and vaguely disturbing article in the NY Times today. NASA is in such need of otherwise obsolete parts that their searching Ebay and such for old equipment to scavenge.

http://nytimes.com/2002/05/12/techno...ss/12NASA.html (requires free registration)
__________________
...And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. --Sir Bedevere
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2002, 06:56 PM
Chuck Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Valley of The Sun
Posts: 1,822
Send a message via AIM to Chuck
Default

I shouldn't have thrown out my TRS-80.
__________________
Life is like a box of chocolates. All of your choices are bad for you.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-May-2002, 02:11 AM
John Kierein John Kierein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,851
Default

NASA is always scrounging for parts. They took the antenna out of the Smithsonian to make the radar map of Venus with the Magellan S/C.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-May-2002, 10:25 PM
Timm Timm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Krefeld, Germany
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
On 2002-05-11 22:11, John Kierein wrote:
NASA is always scrounging for parts. They took the antenna out of the Smithsonian to make the radar map of Venus with the Magellan S/C.
Not really? ... Yes?
I can understand that they rely on the old chips, as they are used in the diagnostic systems of two huge flying bombs. I wouldn't want to use a new, probably unstable system there either, but an old antenna? They should have better sensors right now...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 13-May-2002, 06:18 PM
John Kierein John Kierein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,851
Default

http://www.nasm.si.edu/nasm/dsh/arti...SS-Voyager.htm

As I remember Charlie Brown's Spacecraft Design course at the U. of Colorado, they first borrowed it for testing and then actually flew it when they really had to save more money or the program would be cancelled. It was a case study in the course.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 14-May-2002, 01:39 AM
Gsquare Gsquare is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 691
Default

Nice article, John. Apparently scavenged parts are more reliable.

Let's see... I could send them my old TV satellite dish if that would help; how about a 900 mhz transmitter from my ATT (broken) wireless phone; and of course, I still have a real old watch loaded with radium coated dials-(really hard to come by these days).

Of course I would want a tax deductible receipt; it wouldn't seem right to send that wonderful junk all the way to Pluto without some evidence of my contribution.[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]

G^2
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 14-May-2002, 10:32 PM
Timm Timm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Krefeld, Germany
Posts: 67
Default

Hey, thanks. Interesting Story...
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 15-May-2002, 04:07 PM
Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gonzales, LA
Posts: 171
Send a message via AIM to Tom Send a message via Skype™ to Tom
Default

There's a topic at http://www.snopes2.com/cgi-bin/ultim...;f=39;t=000262 on this subject. Basically, it seems silly to scrounge on ebay when the parts are available at, say, jameco, in quantities. New. Our tax dollars at work?

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Tom on 2002-05-15 12:08 ]</font>
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 15-May-2002, 04:56 PM
David Hall David Hall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 2,689
Default

Quote:
On 2002-05-15 12:07, Tom wrote:

Basically, it seems silly to scrounge on ebay when the parts are available at, say, jameco, in quantities. New. Our tax dollars at work?
I'm sure that would be ok for some items, like the more common processors, but there are probably other things that NASA needs and nobody is selling anymore. That's when you really need to scrounge.

Or maybe they have just discovered that it's easier or cheaper to go this route than to go through traditional suppliers.

The article makes it clear that they generally aren't hunting for old individual PC's or such to tear chips out of. I think the point of it is more that, when looking for out-of-date merchandise like this, they are now using the internet's resources, such as Ebay, to find what they need.

Most likely Ebay was specifically mentioned because this is the exact kind of thing you can find there; bulk quantities of older parts being auctioned off to the highest bidder. And they are probably being auctioned by the very companies that used to try to sell the stuff direct.

When you really need it now, then Ebay may be the best place to start.
__________________
...And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. --Sir Bedevere
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 15-May-2002, 05:06 PM
David Hall David Hall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 2,689
Default

Another note: I think Jameco and companies like it are probably exactly the kind of thing the article is talking about when it says NASA is searching online. It never said Ebay was the only place they were looking.


__________________
...And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. --Sir Bedevere
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 15-May-2002, 05:07 PM
Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gonzales, LA
Posts: 171
Send a message via AIM to Tom Send a message via Skype™ to Tom
Default

Quote:
On 2002-05-15 12:56, David Hall wrote:
I'm sure that would be ok for some items, like the more common processors, but there are probably other things that NASA needs and nobody is selling anymore. That's when you really need to scrounge.
Well, in the article it said they were scrounging for 8086 processors. Jameco has them in bulk for about a buck apiece. If it doesn't have to be "flight certified", off-the-shelf will do. I would be that any electronic component made in the late '70s on is still available. You can still buy tubes, fer cryin' out loud!

NASA has followed the unfortunate track of having everything custom built, even when industry began to produce compatable and reliable equipment, that would do just as well "off the shelf" with only minor, if any, modifications. The "custom" for space flight is a hard mindset to change. Granted, a lot of stuff is unique, (at least in function).

Perhaps they're buying back old NASA equipment. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]

Tom
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today