Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2004, 12:43 PM
EFossa EFossa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 262
Default Rovers and the Martian Winter

Mars reaches superior conjunction and passes behind the Sun on September 15th making communications with the rovers difficult, thats not to far off..

What exactly are the mission planners planning to do with the rovers over this time? I've read articles about "hibernating" but they dont seem to have slowed down that much, certainly not as much as they seemed to predict earlier in the mission.

In terms of solar power, temperatures etc when will the rovers experience the most harsh environmental conditions? I imagine it's not going to get much worse than it is now, infact the latest Opportunity update says power generation is up, the highest since about sol 100

When do conditions start to improve, and at which future date will conditions be at their best again.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2004, 04:09 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,460
Default

See my press conference posting here.

In short: midwinter is around October 15, but mid-September has Earth farthest from Mars (with solar conjunction) and Mars farthest from the Sun at the same time. If the rovers can last until January (one Earth year!), power conditions will be vastly improved.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2004, 08:40 PM
slinted slinted is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 77
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek
In short: midwinter is around October 15, but mid-September has Earth farthest from Mars (with solar conjunction) and Mars farthest from the Sun at the same time. If the rovers can last until January (one Earth year!), power conditions will be vastly improved.
I think the October 15th midwinter applies more to Spirit, at 15 degrees south lattitude vs Opportunity at 1.95 degrees south lattitude.

Unfortunetly, we do still have the constant electrostatic dust accumulation on the panels to fight, which I believe was confirmed to be a constant rate of power loss (x watts lost per day due to dust) at some point midmission. I'm curious how much dust they believe has accumulated on the panels at this point.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 26-August-2004, 02:12 AM
johnwitts johnwitts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,266
Default

I've got some old sweaters they can borrow, if it will help. Hang on in there Spirit and Opportunity. You're doing fine. Let's make it a year each on Mars.
__________________
Things are only impossible until they're not!-Captain Jean-Luc Picard

Admin of the new and very much improved Apollohoax forum
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 26-August-2004, 05:22 AM
Doe, John's Avatar
Doe, John Doe, John is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: undisclosed
Posts: 634
Default

C'mon, give the poor rovers a break. They've aready exceeded designed mission length by about 50%. Let's hear it for 'Murican engineering!!
__________________
Free speech is no problem
It's listening that costs
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 31-August-2004, 04:48 PM
Mainframes's Avatar
Mainframes Mainframes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 654
Send a message via MSN to Mainframes
Default

They should have little automated brushes that clean the dust off the solar panels once a day that would probably help!!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 31-August-2004, 05:21 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mainframes
They should have little automated brushes that clean the dust off the solar panels once a day that would probably help!!
I realize you're probably kidding, but just in case it's stated somewhere that the dust is so fine that it bonds to the solar panels - brushing wouldn't do any good.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 31-August-2004, 07:10 PM
Irishman Irishman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,466
Default

Not to mention that brushing would probably just build up more static.

And the real kicker is that the brushes would require power to operate - would that power required balance the gain from cleaning the dust off the panels? Especially if the dust is too fine to brush off?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2004, 12:40 AM
Doe, John's Avatar
Doe, John Doe, John is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: undisclosed
Posts: 634
Default

How about if they did like the TV broadcasters do on their NASCAR race car cams. Have a long sheet of transparent film covering the relevant surface, with extra on a motor operated spool. When it gets covered with crud activate the motor for a few seconds and roll a clean sheet out. 8)
__________________
Free speech is no problem
It's listening that costs
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2004, 03:49 AM
lyford's Avatar
lyford lyford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doe, John
How about if they did like the TV broadcasters do on their NASCAR race car cams. Have a long sheet of transparent film covering the relevant surface, with extra on a motor operated spool. When it gets covered with crud activate the motor for a few seconds and roll a clean sheet out. 8)
From slashdot.org (my former home until I found this board!)
Quote:
by ModernViking (244510) on Saturday February 28, @06:11PM (#8418755)

First, my credentials. I have worked on the field trials of the FIDO rover. It is the science test bed for the MER rovers that has been tested in various parts of the western United States over the past 6 years.

There have been many ideas tested for the solar panels, including removable plastic coverings, wiper blades, etc. None of them have proven practical. The dust on Mars is extremely fine and electrostatically charged. It sticks to the panels , and every other surface, amazingly well. Figuring out a way to remove Martian dust from surfaces is a field that a lot of thought and experiment has gone into, without discovering any feasible solutions, so far.

During the Pathfinder Mission in 1997, it was found that, by driving the rover over 'large' rocks (large for the rover), some of the larger dust can be shaken off. This is, as I've heard from members of the engineering team, something they intend to try with the MER rovers when needed. It doesn't make a huge improvement, on the order of a couple percent, but every little bit helps.



[ Parent ]


Re:Solar problems (Score:4, Insightful)
by Flakeloaf (321975) on Saturday February 28, @06:22PM (#8418821)
(http://slashdot.org/)

If the dust is electrostatically charged, what would be involved in covering the solar panels with a thin, transparent film or network of wires that is itself charged to repel this dust?

[ Parent ]


Re:Solar problems (Score:4, Insightful)
by Daniel_Staal (609844) <DStaal@usa.net> on Saturday February 28, @06:49PM (#8418968)

Of course, you are assuming all the dust has the same charge...

Not a likely situation.

[ Parent ]
Re:Solar problems by torpor (Score:1) Sunday February 29, @06:11AM


Re:Solar problems (Score:4, Interesting)
by Senjutsu (614542) on Saturday February 28, @07:08PM (#8419124)

Which would repel all the dust of the same charge, but attract the rest. Plus you've added the possibility that something could short across this wire grid and drain the battery real quick.
Some scary comments in that thread too. I guess there are plenty of anti-space woo woos amongst the programmer class.
__________________
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!"
Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2004, 11:33 PM
Doe, John's Avatar
Doe, John Doe, John is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: undisclosed
Posts: 634
Default

oh well, just a thought
__________________
Free speech is no problem
It's listening that costs
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2004, 11:55 PM
lyford's Avatar
lyford lyford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doe, John
oh well, just a thought
Mars beats us again! The next rover will be NUKE-U-LAR so it should just keep going and going and going and going.....
__________________
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!"
Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-September-2004, 05:25 AM
JonClarke JonClarke is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,519
Default

The MERs may die of mechanical problems long before the panels are too dust ridden to supply the needed power. So there is no point going nuclear until we can demonstrate rovers with sufficient relability to justify the theoretically unlimited range. Plus nuclear would probably be more costly than solar panels, so there is a cost-benefit analysis needed. Nuclear is ANoption, but not neccessarily THE option. Of the next rovers salted to fly, MSL is currently nuclear, ExoMars solar.

Cheers

jon
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2004, 03:54 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,460
Default

Geoffrey Landis, one of the Mars scientists, said at Worldcon that there were all sort of approaches considered for dealing with the dust accumulation. The engineers decided, though, that the simplest approach for the mass allocated, rather than try to install some fancy gadgetry, was just to make the solar panels bigger.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2004, 02:03 AM
Doe, John's Avatar
Doe, John Doe, John is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: undisclosed
Posts: 634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek
Geoffrey Landis, one of the Mars scientists, said at Worldcon that there were all sort of approaches considered for dealing with the dust accumulation. The engineers decided, though, that the simplest approach for the mass allocated, rather than try to install some fancy gadgetry, was just to make the solar panels bigger.
I love it. The archetypical American solution to power problems. Just put a bigger engine on it. =D> corvette vs. porsche :P
__________________
Free speech is no problem
It's listening that costs
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2004, 10:53 PM
lyford's Avatar
lyford lyford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 532
Default

SPIRIT UPDATE: Spirit on Autopilot - sol 239-242, September 09, 2004
Quote:
Spirit is in safe place to continue daily science observations automatically throughout the solar conjunction period when engineers and scientists will be unable to send commands reliably to the rover. An 18-day period began a transition into solar conjunction on sol 241, when the Sun partially obscured the communications path between Earth and Mars, making communications sessions unreliable. Engineers were able to successfully command Spirit on sol 241, and they had partial commanding success on sol 242.
Opportunity seems to be humming along in the aptly named Endurance crater. Anyone know if the MINI-TES is broke yet? Has it gotten cold enough to break it or is there a chance that we can dodge that bullet too?
__________________
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!"
Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-September-2004, 02:56 AM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lyford
Anyone know if the MINI-TES is broke yet? Has it gotten cold enough to break it or is there a chance that we can dodge that bullet too?
The Opportunity status report at the link you provided indicates that they used the mini-TES on Sol 211.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-September-2004, 04:59 AM
lyford's Avatar
lyford lyford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek
Quote:
Originally Posted by lyford
Anyone know if the MINI-TES is broke yet? Has it gotten cold enough to break it or is there a chance that we can dodge that bullet too?
The Opportunity status report at the link you provided indicates that they used the mini-TES on Sol 211.
You know I skimmed the article for mention of the mini-TES and missed it because they had the gall to call it the miniature thermal emission spectrometer. I've never seen them pass up a perfectly good acronym moment before.
I am humbled now, and shall retire to my chambers.
__________________
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!"
Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10-September-2004, 12:32 PM
banquo's_bumble_puppy's Avatar
banquo's_bumble_puppy banquo's_bumble_puppy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alpha III
Posts: 1,974
Default Could the rock grinder be used to blow dust off solar panels

Just a thought- re. the rovers-could the rock grinder be used to blow dust off solar panels? Does this thing generate air puffs?
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 10-September-2004, 03:53 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lyford
You know I skimmed the article for mention of the mini-TES and missed it because they had the gall to call it the miniature thermal emission spectrometer. I've never seen them pass up a perfectly good acronym moment before.
Whoever wrote it probably had to go stand in the corner for a couple of hours for blatant acronym avoidance (BAA). We don't tolerate that sort of thing here at NASA!
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 10-September-2004, 04:09 PM