|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Would a comet the size of "Biedermann," about 1 mile wide, cause a tsunami that big, going in all the way to Ohio and Tennessee? I know that comet impacts cause huge waves, but I was wondering if the magnitude is correct.
|
|
||||
|
That tsunami would be able to travel long distances on the sea. It was approximately 1.5 km high (comparing with the WTC, which is engulfed by it in the movie), travelling at 3x the speed of sound. That mass of water would flatten everything on the shore line, advancing some miles inland, until it lost momentum. But somebody has to prove me that it would go further than a few miles into the continent.
__________________
What brings us together is stronger than what pulls us apart |
|
|||
|
This probably belongs in bad tv/bad movies, but I agree with you. I doubt that the wave would travel more than a few miles. Even crediting it as being a mile high, it's quite some way over fairly rough terrain to the appalachain mtns. A couple hundred miles around that point I believe. It sure as heck isn't gonna get PAST the mtns.
|
|
|||
|
Consider the La Palma megatsunami. In the event that it happens, 500 billion tons of rock and debris will plunge into the ocean, pushing up an unimaginably large wall of water that will race towards the U.S. east coast at around 450mph per hour. Even when it hits, it will only affect the easternmost twelve or so miles of the country. It's doubtful that the fictitious comet will produce larger devastation.
|
|
|||
|
8-[
This is all well and good, but... well... Some of us live on the coast. It's nice to know that all you people get to live, but...umm... Well, let's just say I'd rather it were me than you.
__________________
"I'm making wheatloaf. It's like meatloaf, only with wheat" "Isn't that just...bread?" |
|
|||
|
In addition to that, the tsunami wouldn't be that fast, according to the BA. The wave height increases by a huge amount, but the speed also falls to "only" a hundred kilometers per second. But on the other hand, we might be underestimating the fury of a comet impact.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
"I'm making wheatloaf. It's like meatloaf, only with wheat" "Isn't that just...bread?" |
|
|||
|
If you want to work the numbers refer to
http://personals.galaxyinternet.net/tunga/ There is still large variation in predicted impact driven tsunami models among experts. H. J. Melosh precently published that predicted waveheight is currently overestimated because (1) an impact induced tsunami will have a shorter wavelength than an earthquake induced tsunami, & (2) wave harmonics significantly dampen waveheight for an impact induced tsunami. This is based on early atomic bomb underwater testing. Personnally, I don't think you need to be worried about a tsunami in the nation's midsection from a 1-mile diameter comet. Although if it happened to hit in the middle of Lake Michigan, it might produce some unusual effects. |
|
||||
|
I read somewhere that the number of people actively involved in tracking NEOs is equivalent to that of an average sized branch of McDonalds
So one comet induced catastrophe - do you want fries with that and is that sit in or to go :P
__________________
Moderations in purple Fame, glory, adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things. To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post: ![]() ───────────────────────────────────────────── ◄ Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄ Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice ► |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|