Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2005, 10:19 PM
SkepticJ's Avatar
SkepticJ SkepticJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 989
Default Mars rovers and Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators

Why are solar panels used instead of RTGs on Mars rovers? The radioactive stuff that would be released after millennia of erosion delt to the rover from blowing dust and sand on Mars?
__________________
If we don't play god, who will?-James Watson
I never think of the future, it comes soon enough.-Albert Einstein
The large print giveth and the small print taketh away.-Tom Waits
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a yo-yo.-Enoch Root, The Confusion
When I was a kid, if someone brandished a shrink gun he'd get a little bit of respect!-Myron Reducto, Harvey Birdman
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2005, 10:24 PM
Lance's Avatar
Lance Lance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 1,544
Default

I can't answer why the didn't this time, but they are considering it next time.

Quote:
NASA is considering a radioisotope power source that would generate electricity to power sophisticated science instruments and systems. This power source would also allow the rover to operate at higher and lower latitudes than those that might be traversed by a similarly equipped rover dependent on solar and battery power.
I actually thought they'd already made this choice... Guess not.
__________________
Home of the Illumi-Llama:
The Illuminati-R-Us Forums
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2005, 10:27 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,460
Default Re: Mars rovers and Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkepticJ
Why are solar panels used instead of RTGs on Mars rovers? The radioactive stuff that would be released after millennia of erosion delt to the rover from blowing dust and sand on Mars?
Launching RTGs cause a lot of yelling and screaming (as with Cassini and Galileo) that NASA would like to avoid. Launching RTGs also requires approval from the White House.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2005, 10:34 PM
SkepticJ's Avatar
SkepticJ SkepticJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 989
Default

Hmmm. Sounds good. I mean we can go and pick them up long before they wear open. Being able to work at night would be a boon to. How many years would the power last for the rover? The Voyagers will have power for about 17-20 more years if I'm remembering right. What if the rover used brushless motors, it could run for decades couldn't it? And charge certain parts so Martian dust doesn't stick and cause wear.
__________________
If we don't play god, who will?-James Watson
I never think of the future, it comes soon enough.-Albert Einstein
The large print giveth and the small print taketh away.-Tom Waits
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a yo-yo.-Enoch Root, The Confusion
When I was a kid, if someone brandished a shrink gun he'd get a little bit of respect!-Myron Reducto, Harvey Birdman
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2005, 10:35 PM
SkepticJ's Avatar
SkepticJ SkepticJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 989
Default Re: Mars rovers and Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek
Launching RTGs cause a lot of yelling and screaming (as with Cassini and Galileo) that NASA would like to avoid. Launching RTGs also requires approval from the White House.
Ah, have to love those nuke fearing woo woos.
__________________
If we don't play god, who will?-James Watson
I never think of the future, it comes soon enough.-Albert Einstein
The large print giveth and the small print taketh away.-Tom Waits
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a yo-yo.-Enoch Root, The Confusion
When I was a kid, if someone brandished a shrink gun he'd get a little bit of respect!-Myron Reducto, Harvey Birdman
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2005, 10:42 PM
Ilya's Avatar
Ilya Ilya is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,179
Default

Also, RTG's are expensive. Each adds about $50 million to the cost of the mission, so NASA uses them only when it absolutely has to.
__________________
Fiction has to be plausible. Reality is under no such constraint.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2005, 10:45 PM
John Kierein John Kierein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,851
Default

JPL has a developed RTG they called a "Powerstick". Lewis Research Center had hoped to use them for a proposed "Project Pascal" that would have distributed several landers over Mars to make weather measurements to be relayed to an orbiter and then to earth. I studied it and seem to remember that it may have included microphones to hear what Mars sounded like. The landers would have been dispersed from a main spacecraft bus as it approached Mars so that they would be at multiple locations.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today