|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Can anyone point me toward additional information about the Titan IV mentioned in the linked story?
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...il-050407.html I hate it when there is a story about something like this but failing to mention what the rocket was for, why that specific trajectory, etc, etc. Is this the sort of trajectory that they would have to use to place an object in polar orbit? Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks, Sheki |
|
||||
|
This article:
link says the delay is due to ground hardware issues. No mention of oil platforms in peril. The payload is a classified NRO satellite. What's the assumed ground track for the launch? CJSF
__________________
Two years ago moved from my town I was looking up past the city lights But the city lights got in my way See the constellation ride across the sky No cigar, no lady on his arm Just a guy made of dots and lines -from "See The Constellation" by They Might Be Giants |
|
|||
|
Seems the CBC really messed-up some important details there. Odd to call an NRO mission a "USAF missile test". Reading that, my first thoughts were "Titan IV missile test? What the heck are they doing, putting an interceptor warhead on a Titan IV and testing to see if they can take out an inbound ICBM flying in over the arctic?"
Heh, I guess not! Sheki |
|
|||
|
Ahhh, that's better:
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...ile050408.html And now, as an added bonus, it looks like some interesting politics might play out. Sheki |