Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2003, 11:44 AM
Haglund Haglund is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 418
Default

I read something about how one could build a powerplant near a black hole. It would work like the hydrogenplants on earth, but instead of falling water it would be other matter falling towards the hole, providing the energy. They didn't say much and it was a while ago I read it, but it seems like an innovative solution...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 15-November-2003, 02:22 AM
QJones QJones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 255
Default

The walls of a dam essentially have a great amount of friction, preventing the water from washing away the walls. And then, water is allowed to leak through, turning turbines.

The problem with making turbines and allowing mass to fall into a black hole, is that 'what's holding the turbines'? They'd fall in too!

I guess you could make a really, (REALLY) long tether, holding the turbines to a orbiting gas giant, or something.
__________________
Live long enough to see Space!

We can get to space as a species. The above link is information about life-extension (living longer) so that you can personally see a space-based civilization.

The MPrize (a prize to encourage life extension research now contains over 3 million dollars.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 15-November-2003, 08:37 AM
Haglund Haglund is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 418
Default

What if you had it in orbit around the black hole? Of course, any matter turning the "turbines" would alter the orbit anyway, right? I wonder if this could be done in some way...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 15-November-2003, 10:00 AM
Matthew Matthew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,713
Default

Things can orbit black holes, you just need to be a certain distance away. If you had a metallic surface orbitting a black hole you could place all your turbines ect. on it. You could also have cities.

The matter could be rubbish from the cities, gas, asteroids, anything really! The matter would be sent in toward the black hole, and be spun back out (using a carefully plotted trajectory) hitting your turbines and creating electricity. This could also be used to launch space ships at extreemely high speeds.

There is one problem with a black hole power plant, it would take a long time before the mass came back. For the most energy in your matter you would try and get the matter close to the black hole (which would increase its speed more) as you could, but there is a problem in this, the closer it gets to the hole, the slower it seems to go! The matter may be travelling at huge speeds (maybe speeds of >.5c), but to an outside observer it would seem to be travelling at extremely slow speeds. This effect was predicted by Einstien, in his General Theory of Reletivity.
__________________
MacTalk - The Australian Apple Community - iPod, iPhone and Mac.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 15-November-2003, 11:33 AM
Haglund Haglund is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 418
Default

The slingshot idea seems cool, you would have the black hole to accelerate the mass before having it generate electricity.


Or what about this idea. You could build the turbine as a ring around the black hole, with lots of huge shovels placed around an extremely strong cable (this cable going around the hole as a circle). These "shovels" would be perhaps giant magnetic fields. Then you could let the accretion disk (of massive amounts of matter being sucked in to the hole) around the black hole make this giant ring spin around. Of course to build something like this would not be easy :-)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 15-November-2003, 03:20 PM
Planetwatcher
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The biggest problem with the ideas here is the ergosphere would not allow a stable orbit of the black hole. :huh:
It is in the ergoshere where the turbines would have to be to generate the power.
And with no means we know of to keep the turbines from being sucked through the event horizon.

And I don't think I'd want any settlements near a black hole. I don't care what you can get from it. The best way to deal with a black hole is by the A T and T method.
LONG DISTANCE, and the farther at that, the better.

But now using an ergosphere to launch ships at great speeds is pure genus, and nothing could beat a black hole for a garbage dump. :P
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 15-November-2003, 04:26 PM
Haglund Haglund is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 418
Default

Well it would be orbiting the black hole of course...
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 15-November-2003, 11:51 PM
Menikmati Menikmati is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 73
Send a message via AIM to Menikmati
Default

Over time the black hole would shrink and wouldn't that cause effect on what is orbiting it? Couldn't the gravity attraction change when it shrinks and whatever orbiting the black hole would be sent out or sucked in?
__________________
Imagination is more important than knowledge. -- Albert Einstein

"The book of nature is written in mathematical language." -- Galileo
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 16-November-2003, 12:47 AM
Matthew Matthew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,713
Default

Quote:
Over time the black hole would shrink and wouldn't that cause effect on what is orbiting it? Couldn't the gravity attraction change when it shrinks and whatever orbiting the black hole would be sent out or sucked in?
Over time the size of a black hole changes, if it absorbs more mass it gets bigger, but it takes a long time for a black hole to decrese in mass, with Hawking Radiation.
__________________
MacTalk - The Australian Apple Community - iPod, iPhone and Mac.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 16-November-2003, 02:08 AM
Menikmati Menikmati is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 73
Send a message via AIM to Menikmati
Default

Quote:
Over time the size of a black hole changes, if it absorbs more mass it gets bigger, but it takes a long time for a black hole to decrese in mass, with Hawking Radiation.
Yes I understand that, I have read like three of his books. I was just wondering if the mass change of the black hole would have an effect on whats orbiting it.
__________________
Imagination is more important than knowledge. -- Albert Einstein

"The book of nature is written in mathematical language." -- Galileo
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 16-November-2003, 10:26 PM
Planetwatcher
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The change would be more mass would increase the size and gravity influence of the black hole, so orbital elements would eventually be consumed it the orbit isn't adjusted quite frequently.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 17-November-2003, 08:23 AM
Matthew Matthew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,713
Default

If the black holes mass increased its gravity would increse, so for objects to continue to orbit it at the same speed it would need to go further out. And if the black holes mass decreased its gravitational influence would decrease so for objecvts to continue to orbit at the same speed they would need to go closer to the black hole.
__________________
MacTalk - The Australian Apple Community - iPod, iPhone and Mac.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 25-November-2003, 09:40 AM
Grokker Grokker is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3
Default

I began looking over a similiar question myself and soon realized that even the method of preparing the question was non-trivial.

http://www.relativitydomains.com/General/P.../PlanOrbit1.htm

It would be nice though to be able to throw people you hate into a black hole with some measure of chance. Russian roulette on a cosmological stage. The physics behind the energy inherent in that state of motion is known, but how will you design those machines, and what will you make them out of? Shouldn't we be looking for mega-engineering projects we can begin modelling for accuracy? I want a program like celestia that models physics {QED, Relativistic mechanics}, that is easily upgradeable with new theories. Autocad is cool for modelling some stuff, but something like celestia can be used by anyone productively. Does anyone know of an open source physics program or philosophy?

Found this
http://physics.clarku.edu/~hgould/teaching...g/Dcomp2002.pdf

http://www.particle.kth.se/~fmi/kurs/Physi.../resources.html

I think english will eventually become a second language as I use my mind for the contructing of machines, I wonder if painters live a life in art as I hope to live a life in engineering. Maybe those dirty hippies aren't so bad after all.
__________________
We can have in life but one great experience at best, and the secret of life is to reproduce that experience as often as possible – Wilde
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today