Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2004, 12:16 PM
tycho1981 tycho1981 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 153
Default

http://www.marsdaily.com/2004/040114165625...5.hdc9ehsq.html

how about this?
I think a Russian plan is better
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2004, 12:30 PM
Josh's Avatar
Josh Josh is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,836
Send a message via MSN to Josh
Default

More power to them! I hope they can do it .. not least because if they do the USA will get their asses into gear. But, can the Russians even afford that? That's what happens when you think to take a pencil instead of a million dollar specially designed space pen.
__________________
1·618033988749894848204586834365638117720309179805 76286213544862270526046281890244970720720418939113 74
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2004, 12:36 PM
damienpaul damienpaul is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 2,804
Default

I would not be surprised if there were concerted efforts afoot from the Chinese, Japanese and Europeans as well.
__________________
Damien,
International Baccalaureate Physics teacher
Optics, Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Instrumentation Major
Admin: Pacific Science and Art
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2004, 10:17 PM
DippyHippy's Avatar
DippyHippy DippyHippy is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lawton, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,820
Default

I'm sure the ESA would be involved at some point, but not on their own... they'd contribute via the Russians or the US... they don't seem to be interested in manned spaceflight as much as everyone else.
__________________
"The stars are my home"
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe... Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion... I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark, near the Tanhauser Gate... all those moments will be lost, in time... like tears in the rain..."
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2004, 11:59 PM
Tiny's Avatar
Tiny Tiny is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 570
Default

it looks like most of the big countries already start going to take over the red planet, except the small countries still in progress I guess ^^
__________________
We come without a thing and gone without a thing. We need simple life. A cup of teas and a couple of meals per day, that is good enough. And this is my standard of living.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2004, 12:27 AM
kashi kashi is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,973
Send a message via MSN to kashi
Default

I'd love to see Russia make it there before the US.
__________________
Climate Change Australia
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2004, 01:33 AM
Chook Chook is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 847
Default

I know what you mean, Kashi; but I'd hate to see any country get anywhere before the USA - because they are the "good" guys, and we are on their side.

They've just overspent, that's all.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2004, 09:34 AM
Faulkner
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
I'd hate to see any country get anywhere before the USA - because they are the "good" guys, and we are on their side.
Man, I can't figure you out, Chook. Are you taking the ****? Or are you serious?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2004, 02:20 PM
tycho1981 tycho1981 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 153
Default

russia is good, they now suffering with very low budget but they going for it! still launch people to space.they know too that low budget is lower safety too.

what should NASA do if their side? cancels everything!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2004, 06:34 PM
I, Brian I, Brian is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 19
Default

Russia is playing the bluff card - the Russians have been trying to pretend for years that they are still a superpower. Now all they have is a fading space industry, the same poverty, yet far less political and military influence on the world. It's big talk with no walk.

Unfortunately, for all George W's words, he's not announced real plans for actually acheiving said goals. He's already been criticised for overspending on an economy running further into the red.

The only thing going for his announcement is the fact that there's no way that the USA will let China get too comfy in space. This is basically america waking up, rather than actually doing anything concrete.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2004, 06:51 PM
tycho1981 tycho1981 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 153
Default

russian keep sending supply and crew to ISS what is too expensive for them, they still do it.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2004, 07:46 PM
Chook Chook is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 847
Default

Trying to "keep up" with America led to her demise as a world power before. I totally agree with I,Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2004, 07:50 PM
Chook Chook is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 847
Default

Quote tycho 1981:
"russian keep sending supply and crew to ISS what is too expensive for them, they still do it"

... and this is a classical receipe for going broke - for a country, or you and I - spending when you haven't got the money.

Simple - anybody can understand, even FAULKNER.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 20-January-2004, 12:30 AM
Duane's Avatar
Duane Duane is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 2,787
Send a message via MSN to Duane
Default

Quote:
That's what happens when you think to take a pencil instead of a million dollar specially designed space pen.

Har har! For sure!
__________________
All civilizations become either spacefaring or extinct.~ Carl Sagan ~

Humanity must rise above the Earth, to the top of the atmosphere and beyond, for only then will we fully understand the world in which we live.~Socrates, 500 B.C. ~

Let every man judge according to his own standards, by what he has himself read, not by what others tell him. ~Albert Einstein~
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 20-January-2004, 12:59 AM
soyuz soyuz is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by tycho1981@Jan 17 2004, 06:51 PM
russian keep sending supply and crew to ISS what is too expensive for them, they still do it.
If a remeber correctly it's the USA that has a hole the size of Texas in its budget. And as far as i know Russia hasn't got a deficit. And with these high oil prices the future looks bright for Russia's budget.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 20-January-2004, 01:18 AM
MarQ MarQ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: East Tennessee, Johnson City/Kingsport/Bristol
Posts: 64
Default

The crystal ball for space is hard to read. Whodathunkit that 29 years after Apollo-Soyuz linkup that America would depend on a Soyuz spaceship for a ride to the International Space Station? How about Russia and China going to the Moon together?
With the Space Shuttle said to be flown another 7 years (times 4 flights a year equals only 28 flights with six or seven seats each that has NASA astronauts playing musical chairs), America is clearly all dressed up and no place to go.
Until, of course, when this fabulous Crew Exploration Vehicle is cranked into production--the blueprints of which haven't been drawn yet.
I don't know, but it looks like a bunch of smoke and mirrors for what could be a 10 year lull, instead of conquest.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 14-July-2004, 04:04 AM
spedmen spedmen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
That's what happens when you think to take a pencil instead of a million dollar specially designed space pen.


Development on that /|\


When Nasa first started sending up astronauts, they quickly discovered that ball-point pens would not work in zero gravity. To combat the problem, scientists spent a decade and 12 billion dollars to develop a pen that writes in zero gravity, upside down, underwater, on almost any surface including glass and at temperatures ranging from below freezing to 300 C. The Russians used a pencil.

find more jokes like this at
http://http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100...ll&siteid=50082]
__________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity.
Albert Einstein

Do not worry about your difficulties in Mathematics. I can assure you mine are still greater.
Albert Einstein

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
Albert Einstein

Both the cockroach and the bird would get along very well without us, although the cockroach would miss us most.
Joseph Wood Krutch
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 14-July-2004, 04:24 AM
Tom2Mars's Avatar
Tom2Mars Tom2Mars is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 836
Default

Cryllic did not print...
__________________
Pre-Quote: 'To survive one has to experiment. When the environment changes, the traditional way of doing things doesn't work.'

Quote:
"It's the outriders, the organisms that seem to be maladjusted before the change, which are the only ones that survive these changes...in that way a species continues."

Carl Sagan
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-December-2004, 02:18 AM
code man
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Some news on Russia

Quote:
Some news & debate on the net on this one

Quote:
There has been much talk on the web about this spacecraft, I have gotten some quick info of other postings and space forums

QUOTE

It could be very good, it is a space craft with a 6 manned crew (2 pilots, 4 passengers) and a Launch mass of 14.5 tons. The craft might be a very nice and cost effective reusable re-entry vehicle something the shuttle always wanted to be but never actually was. This could become Russia's number one space ship and like the Soyuz, it has a rocket to pull the spaceship away from the launch vehicle in an emergency. What many whated to see was some agency develop a new space plane or a space craft with the wings that are retractable or a cheap craft that could go on a mission to the planets.
http://www2.arnes.si/~ssdszaj1/vesolje/nav...4/02/kliper.jpg
Energia, the developer of the Soyuz spacecraft, has been working on a brand-new vehicle for some months and it looks like they have been doing a very good job. The giant Russian Energia rockets were great and today the Russian president has been putting more money into Russian Nuclear technology and its likely to put more cash into space before 2007 so Russia can celebrate the SputnikI launch of 57.
http://www.federalspace.ru/PictFiles/P_rkk_15.jpg
This craft might be a great help to Russia's space flights and has an Internal available volume 20 cubic meters. Russia had already NASA to take part in the Klipper project but did not receive an official answer, now it has built the craft on its own however the European Space Agency showed interest in the offer and might buy into it if Europe desires manned flights. The Russian craft kliper can be used for inplanetary flights, but maybe the Russians really only mean to the moon?
http://www.astronautix.com/graphics/k/kliper04.jpg
The Russian spacecraft is a great design and consisted of three major modules. Klipper will be capable of flights to the ISS and interplanetary missions. Maybe the entry vehicle (CEV) would be used for LEO flights and as a entry vehicle for the Moon or Russian Mars crews when they get back. Scientists expect that the Kliper would be launched by the Russian Angara booster, an existing pad at Baikonur would be modified initially but it is not really known where the launch site will be. A Russian Kliper may launch from a pad at Plesetsk, or the new Soyuz pad at Kourou at a French facility in South America it could be modified eventually to accommodate the Onega.
http://www.federalspace.ru/PictFiles/p_rkk_18.jpg
The Russians seem to be one of the top players in making headway on developing the next-generation spacecraft. At the current rate of development, the United States will not have an alternative to the shuttle for another 10 to 15 years, if then. The Russians have had many good space plans Russians have what appears to be a sound, practical design for a vehicle . Now the Russians have been slogging away, in spite of being broke, building upon success after success. The craft has a maximum diameter of 3.06 meters and a Landing mass of 9.5 to 10.0 tonnes.
http://www.federalspace.ru/PictFiles/P_rkk_19.jpg
If the Europeans buy into this craft the Russians will no longer be broke and full of cash for their space programme, and having a European manned access to the station is really the only thing missing from European capabilities at the moment. An interplanetary CEV would be a fantastic thing, and this Russian design might be great. The Kliper will land with the help of a three main uncontrolled parachutes and several solid-propellant engines, which would be fired shortly before the touchdown. Space writers have noted that while in orbit, the Kliper would be capable of delivering crew and cargo to the space station or carrying two pilots and four passengers, including tourists, on an autonomous flight.
http://www.astronautix.com/graphics/k/klipercu.jpg
This Russian design has been quiet smart and Investment in the future is the key to choosing what the future of Space will be.


NASA plans on having the shuttle back soon. People are saying that the shuttle might again become a major problem for NASA. There have also been remarks that NASA will lose valuable learning experiences allowing other nations to catch up and possibly surpass them all the while the private sector will continue to embarass NASA by doing it cheaper, faster, better. Some people say shuttle really needs to be retired - but as NASA have missed the opportunity to develop something else in the two years the shuttle has been grounded (and of course pumped a huge amount of their budget into it rather than a 'replacement)Now it has been reported that nearly two years after Columbia shattered in the sky, NASA still has no way of repairing the kind of holes that could doom another shuttle, space agency officials acknowledged Monday in their latest status report on the return-to-flight effort.The development of patches for the shuttle wings and other vulnerable locations is proving far more difficult than imagined just months ago and, along with devising a way for astronauts to inspect their spaceship in orbit, represents "one of the most challenging and extensive return-to-flight tasks," the 268-page report said. The Space shuttle was originally supposed to push us out further into Space, it was to be cost effective, do wonderful groundbreaking science and fly every two weeks. It already had serious safety questions, it began costing over $450 million per launch, not enough science was done and it only went up about four or five times a year.

As the shuttle begins its return to Space there are people who have questions about the current space programe. NASA still has to get its management right, get the budget books in order and answer those questions of saftey. Some people like myself hoped that the Shuttle would be gone and NASA would have come up with a new and fantastic functional space craft.The shuttle will be kept very busy after its return to flight, there is much science to catch up on and experiments to do. There is also the current problem with Hubble and the possibility that shuttle will be used to do this work. The shuttle will also need many other trips and will be required for the ISS, estimates are that about 25 ( minimum ) shuttle flights will be needed for NASA to finish its work and the shuttle can then bow out of service by 2010. Some think that 25 flights and pushing the shuttle until 2010 could be quiet dangerous and risk lives. Some top scientists and astronauts have wrote ideas and talked on how the ISS station could have provided safe haven for the Columbia crew while everybody scrambled to launch a second orbiter to bring them all home safely. Some think that this plan of an ISS safe haven cold be very important for the shuttle return. The astronaut Buzz Aldrin who has been helping commercialisation, privatization of space-flight, push space-tourism, written much material and made very important comments on NASA has also had some good views on the current situation. Buzz has had many fantastic insights into the future of Space, the Apollo 11 moonwalker Buzz Aldrin has been calling for rejuvenated space efforts, steeped in market economics. Aldrin had said how the shuttle was expected to be a lot more robust but Buzz Aldrin told the reality of the shuttle in flight is that it is "not robust" on launch and "hazardous". Buzz, the second man on the Moon also explained what NASA will have to do saying we may need to have some risky shuttle flights for a limited period of time, or we are going to stand down and fly Soyuz spacecraft. Buzz has already explained how future shuttle flights should be required to be lofted into an orbit that is compatible with that of the space station, so if problems came up or inspections/repairs were needed, shuttle crews would find safe-haven at the station.

I hope everything works out fine and everything goes ahead safely, this shuttle business has a lot of people looking at NASA.



Why haven't the American public backed a new space craft designs, is it that it doesn't even really care about Space exploration anymore ??


A a new manned shuttle to the station at 2010 or before would be great, even if it is the Russians who are doing it, the Kliper space ship might be very good indeed.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-December-2004, 04:44 AM
zephyr46 zephyr46 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 885
Default

Best of luck to them!

And I think Russia is leading in the "can you come up with a reason for the existence of the ISS?" stakes, top marks!

I think the ISS should be in orbit around the moon or somthing, look at todays news, not "the ISS has made an amazing discovery!' no its the ISS astronauts might have to evacuate bescause they have nearly run out of food!

Wheres Burt? Whats he up these days?

Your right into this arn't you codeman

I think it reflects a deeper success in thinking that Russia is still the other big player in space travel. I wonder why they never made it to the moon. I watched 'the right stuff' the other night. What an amazing story, the mercury catch up programme, then Apollo, what happened Russia?

A overveiw of the Salyut space stations.
and
Mir

Overveiw of both from PBS

The issue of safety would be my oinly qualification.
__________________
My Webpage
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 08-December-2004, 06:12 AM
om@umr.edu om@umr.edu is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,234
Default

Competition in space discovery could be productive and lead to better space science.

However better space science was not the primary goal of the the race to the Moon in the 1960s.

I hope the race to Mars is not part of a return to the Cold War.

With kind regards,

Oliver
http://www.umr.edu/~om
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 10-December-2004, 09:39 PM
TuTone's Avatar
TuTone TuTone is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Peoria, Arizona
Posts: 213
Default

Wish George War Bush didn't spend all that money in Iraq & spent it on something more useful, like NASA.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2005, 06:21 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 25,996
Default

Six-seat spacecraft top of Russian space plan

Quote:
Russia is paving the way for a crewed mission to Mars, according to its new 10-year space plan. The plan also calls for it to finish the construction of its section of the International Space Station, though some analysts say this may now be impossible.

The Russian government has approved a space programme covering 2006 to 2015, a Russian space agency official told the Itar-Tass news agency on Tuesday. "The plan has been approved by the Russian government, which implies a commitment to fund it," says John Logsdon, director of the Space Policy Institute at George Washington University in Washington DC, US.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today