Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 10-March-2008, 04:58 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 26,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joema View Post
I doubt it would attempt landing at a non-paved strip, although technically White Sands is non-paved. The orbiter tire loading is very high and landing gear structural margins are low. It simply cannot take a hard landing like an airliner.
My sources here at Goddard say that they're never going to land at White Sands again if they can help it. The one time they did, the damage to the tiles from the blowing sands was considerable.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 10-March-2008, 06:57 PM
samkent samkent is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 775
Default

Out of curiosity. How much time would they have to bail out? A five minute window? Ten?
I’m assuming there is a preset range of altitudes and speed that would allow this.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 10-March-2008, 07:05 PM
joema joema is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,077
Default

Orbiter would be put on autopilot at about 25,000 ft. NASA estimates crew of eight could bail out within 90 sec (about 12 sec per crewmember), which should be completed before reaching 10,000 ft.

From that point the vehicle would take approx 90 more sec. to descend to 2,000 ft (180 sec. total from beginning sequence). So there should be additional time in case someone was slow.

http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/shuttle/.../inflight.html

Despite the limitations it's vastly better than before Challenger when the only option was an ocean ditching, considered non-survivable for structural reasons.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today