Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2006, 07:55 PM
trswartz trswartz is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2
Cool Highest Maximum orbit of space shuttle

Does anyone know what shuttle flight acheived the highest maximum orbit?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2006, 08:48 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 10,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trswartz
Does anyone know what shuttle flight acheived the highest maximum orbit?
Probably one of the Hubble missions. Let's see, here's a CNN page from 1997 that says "The crew also boosted Hubble into a 385-mile-high orbit, the highest the telescope -- or a space shuttle -- has ever flown."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2006, 09:00 PM
trswartz trswartz is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2
Talking Thanks!

Thank you. I am teaching a fifth-grade class about the space program and wanted to compare how far the ISS and space shuttle orbits are compared to weather and communication satellites.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2006, 09:20 PM
tlbs101's Avatar
tlbs101 tlbs101 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 837
Default

Here's a good analogy.

The orbital height of the ISS, shuttle, or Hubble are approximately the same as driving across a medium-sized state in the US, while the height of broadcast comm. satellites are approximately the same as driving around the world (and the GPS satellites are about 1/2 way in between).
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2006, 09:48 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 26,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hhEb09'1
Probably one of the Hubble missions. Let's see, here's a CNN page from 1997 that says "The crew also boosted Hubble into a 385-mile-high orbit, the highest the telescope -- or a space shuttle -- has ever flown."
Wikipedia lists the initial Hubble deployment mission, STS-31 as reaching 615 km, as contrasted with STS-82's (the mission mentioned above) 574 km.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2006, 11:05 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 10,765
Default

Hmm...385 miles converted into kilometers by multiplying by 1.609344 is 619.6 kilometers. I suppose it could have boosted the Hubble to 619.6 and that would have been the highest Hubble had flown--and higher than any shuttle. One way to interpret it.

Sounds like it's close enough for trswartz's purposes.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2006, 11:30 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 26,043
Default

Okay, NASA gives STS-82's altitude as 334 nautical miles, or 384 statute miles, and also notes that this is the highest altitude ever for Hubble, so after reviewing the play I'll go with STS-82.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 19-January-2006, 08:26 AM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 10,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek
Okay, NASA gives STS-82's altitude as 334 nautical miles, or 384 statute miles, and also notes that this is the highest altitude ever for Hubble, so after reviewing the play I'll go with STS-82.
Weird. The wiki STS-82 page says 360 statute miles, which is the same for the NASA page referenced at the bottom of the wiki article.

PS: The wiki page has Apogee: 574 km in the Mission Parameters, Orbit Altitude: 360 statute miles in the Mission Statistics, and the body mentions the same 335- by 321-nautical-mile orbit mentioned in your article. Hows come no furlongs?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 19-January-2006, 08:35 AM
gwiz's Avatar
gwiz gwiz is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 1,059
Default

The Shuttle reaches its maximum atltitude with a series of manoeuvres, so the maximum altitude of the first orbit is less than the absolute maximum. Sources that quote a single orbital height may not have done the necessary review of all the orbital data for the mission.
__________________
"The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head" Terry Pratchett
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 19-January-2006, 08:39 AM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 10,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gwiz
Sources that quote a single orbital height may not have done the necessary review of all the orbital data for the mission.
In this case, the source for both figures appears to be NASA
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 19-January-2006, 09:22 AM
gwiz's Avatar
gwiz gwiz is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 1,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hhEb09'1
In this case, the source for both figures appears to be NASA
The PR people may not have the necessary contact with the orbital mechanics people, after all, who but a bunch of nitpickers like us gives a monkey's?
__________________
"The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head" Terry Pratchett
Reply With Quote
Old 19-January-2006, 09:49 AM
hhEb09'1
This message has been deleted by hhEb09'1.
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 25-January-2006, 09:43 PM
publiusr publiusr is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,181
Default

Buran could take extra fuel in its payload bay and could fly higher than STS IIRC
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 07:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today