|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Planetary Society Weblog: Science Timeline for Monday's MESSENGER flyby of Mercury
Quote:
Previously, from August 4 or thereabouts: Quote:
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
JHUAPL: MESSENGER Mission News: MESSENGER Beams Back First Approach Images of Mercury
Quote:
2008, October 6, 0140 PDT, Monday 2008, October 6, 0440 EDT, Monday 2008, October 6, 0840 UTC, Monday About 2-1/2 days to closest approach
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
See some of Mercury never before seen.
Planetary Society Weblog: MESSENGER gets closer to Mercury Quote:
Closest approach: 2008, October 6, 0140 PDT, Monday 2008, October 6, 0440 EDT, Monday 2008, October 6, 0840 UTC, Monday About 13-1/2 hours to closest approach
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
Oooh, here we go again!
__________________
I want to go back to the moon. I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear. "If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis Rovers forever! - ToSeek |
|
||||
|
dmuller's MESSENGER Real-Time Simulation provides clocks, countdowns, events and simulated images.
Up next: Quote:
2008, October 6, 0140 PDT, Monday 2008, October 6, 0440 EDT, Monday 2008, October 6, 0840 UTC, Monday 7 hours to closest approach
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
It's great to see the speed relative to Mercury increase by thousands of km/h, and to "see" the acceleration. Great resource, dmuller!
__________________
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" -- Charles Darwin "Your right to hold an opinion is not being contested. Your expectation that it be taken seriously is." -- Jason Thompson Meet the OOONG TOE. |
|
||||
|
It is also interesting to see how the orbital speed (=energy) around the Sun is being reduced (despite approaching the Sun) ... of course this is the ultimate goal of the flyby, I just didnt expect it to be so clearly visible (even though I pro0grammed it
) |
|
||||
|
JHUAPL MESSENGER Gallery
Nothing new there, just the 5 inbound images taken the days before closest approach. The events schedule has some departure images and movies being made in the current timeframe. Nothing to see until the data begins to be downlinked. From Planetary Society Weblog: Science Timeline for Monday's MESSENGER flyby of Mercury Quote:
October 6 22:43 PDT, Monday October 7 01:43 EDT, Tuesday October 7 05:43 UTC, Tuesday Edit, later: Planetary Society Weblog: MESSENGER flyby: Radio signals indicate all went well
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... Last edited by 01101001; 06-October-2008 at 06:32 PM.. |
|
||||
|
JHUAPL: MESSENGER Mission News: MESSENGER Flyby of Mercury
Quote:
2008 October 7, 0700 PDT 2008 October 7, 1000 EDT 2008 October 7, 1400 UTC Check JHUAPL MESSENGER Mercury Flyby 2
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
So why no detailed prediction of what happens next? Because we do not have a detailed accounting of how and why Messenger was off-coarse, or by how much. Rough trajectory observational reporting does not allow any more than rough predictions of what will happen next. In general, motion of Messenger away from the sun should net more acceleration towards the sun than expected (notice this is opposite of the Pioneer anomally), gravitational assists less braking, and motion towards the sun less acceleration. This is all complicated by the parallel prediction that the speed of light varies very slightly more-than-expected in the sun's gravitational well. I don't expect details to emerge for several months; and I'm not sure it is kosher to repeat an ATM prediction on a space exploration thread. What we do know is Messengers first pass netted a curious acceleration that on first blush appears to be exactly opposite from what I expected We know they made it, we know good Doppler signals were recorded throughout the pass, and this is a first (there was a blind spot in the first pass)....what is Messenger telling us this time?
__________________
jwj It's a big universe out there...is it really unwinding, really burning out? |
|
||||
|
Sorry I asked a question your fantasy-physics can't answer.
I really should have known better. All we ever get is the promises -- never the promised land. === Images, and discussion of reality: BA Blog: Watermelon Planet JHUAPL MESSENGER Mission: Gallery: Science Photos More there. Edit, hours later: More, at Planetary Society Weblog: First images from MESSENGER's second flyby of Mercury: Quote:
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... Last edited by 01101001; 07-October-2008 at 11:00 PM.. |
|
||||
|
More very cool images. I think it's interesting how this mission is planned, (dictated by the location of Mercury, of course). Three fly-bys that have and will provide images and data never seen before, but all just a tantalizing sample of what is to come.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Who is to say they will not "discover" another surface gravity anomaly that can almost but not quite explain the first anomaly. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
jwj It's a big universe out there...is it really unwinding, really burning out? |
|
||||
|
Since closest approach is on a different tangent; a second three-sigma surface anomaly should be classified as fantasy-physics...as of now, for all [we] know, there was no deviation in the doppler from what was expected. [yes/no?]
__________________
jwj It's a big universe out there...is it really unwinding, really burning out? |
|
||||
|
They continue to put images from Mercury flyby 2 on the web.
JHUAPL MESSENGER Mission: Gallery: Science Photos === NASA TV Schedule Quote:
News Conference Begins 2008 October 29, 1000 PDT, Wednesday 2008 October 29, 1300 EDT, Wednesday 2008 October 29, 1700 UTC, Wednesday NASA TV (or NASA TV Yahoo! source or high-resolution)
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
I missed it.
Some coverage is in BA Blog: The colors of Mercury News conference will probably be rerun on NASA TV today.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
|||
|
Quote:
As regards a surface gravity anomaly being responsible for the anomaly in the first flyby, it was noted that the "blue" material was not always present in the ejecta at every crater which suggests that the crust is not homogenous. Whether this can be extended to infer a concentration of subsurface dikes of dense material sufficient to give the surface gravity anomaly will likely have to await a further mapping after orbital insertion. If there was a surface gravity anomaly, it will not likely to have gone away since the first flyby but will remain apparent from orbit. If it has gone away after orbital insertion, then another explanation will be needed. One can not conclude that a lack of statements regarding any gravity anomaly in the second flyby means that there was none to report. Considering the curious statements in March about the first flyby, it is even more curious that nothing has been said either way about the second flyby with respect to the comments in March. Perhaps they are continuing to analyze the data before making further remarks. They did not state that nothing unusual happened; they said nothing at all with respect to the earlier flyby gravity assist anomaly. I'm not suggesting that there is any conspiracy to keep the information secret; it may be they want to be more sure of the data and not be too speculative. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|