Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 27-March-2006, 01:17 AM
VenusROVER's Avatar
VenusROVER VenusROVER is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: I live in kelowna B.C Canada
Posts: 148
Send a message via MSN to VenusROVER
Default Comon people give me some responses to Jupiter plungers

Comon let me here it
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 27-March-2006, 01:27 AM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin MA
Posts: 16,032
Default

Read about the Galileo Jupiter Atmospheric Probe. This was a pretty successful mission. We could do it again, and learn some new things.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 28-March-2006, 01:11 AM
VenusROVER's Avatar
VenusROVER VenusROVER is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: I live in kelowna B.C Canada
Posts: 148
Send a message via MSN to VenusROVER
Default

I want to here other peoples responses on whether there possible or not
And Jupiters does have oceans except there made of liquid hydrogen. And once you get deep down into Jupiter the liquid hydrogen gets so pressurized and heated that it turns metallic!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 28-March-2006, 01:31 AM
Launch window's Avatar
Launch window Launch window is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,994
Default

my advice is this : Don't try to go everywhere ( we'll never afford it ) if you have an idea for a space mission then just pick two or even one planet ( you seem to be a fan of Venus and Neptune ) so keep studying your math, geography and science.

For Jupiter you'd need some serious advances in materials science, metal toughness/stress and perhaps more impact testing, even if you made your probe from a diamond it would still be destroyed by Jupiter's heat and pressure.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 28-March-2006, 01:39 AM
The Supreme Canuck's Avatar
The Supreme Canuck The Supreme Canuck is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,877
Default

Besides, diamond is pretty brittle.
__________________
Quaeso quousque humi defixa tua mens erit? Nonne aspicis, quae in templa veneris?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 28-March-2006, 02:43 AM
VenusROVER's Avatar
VenusROVER VenusROVER is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: I live in kelowna B.C Canada
Posts: 148
Send a message via MSN to VenusROVER
Default

Perhaps nanotechnology can withstand the pressure dont know about the heat though
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 28-March-2006, 01:43 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin MA
Posts: 16,032
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VenusROVER
Perhaps nanotechnology can withstand the pressure dont know about the heat though
No, sorry, nano technology will not help here. There IS a way to get a probe that could descend deep into Jupiter, but it is very impractical. The question is how deep do you want to go?

The way to do it is to build something with sufficiently thick ablative shielding that the probe can survive long enough to get where you want to go. The idea is that you'd build something shaped like an Apollo commend module, but much bigger. If you'r plan is to get down to where the gas is so thick that the state diagram doesn't distinguish gas from liquid (I think that's what you've been saying), then a back of the envelope calculation says that you'd need to make the probe about 25 miles in diameter out of ceramic materials. The probe would need to be launched so that it enters the Jovian atmosphere pretty obliquely so that it can slow down with aerobraking slowly enough that it wouldn't lose structural integrity (the way the parts of SL9 did on their explosive way in). The Probe would eventually slow down to a few hundred miles per hour, and then start its trip almost straight down, with Jupiter's gravity doing the work of pulling it through the hot dense atmosphere.

On the way down, the atoms in the outer layer would be liberated by the energy of getting rammed by the fast-moving molecules, atoms, and ions of the gas around it, and this would happen at an increasing rate as it descended. Also the descent would slow pretty rapidly as it got deeper in.

Please note that my calculations used a lot of guesses and approximations, and the required diameter could be anywhere from 2 and a half miles to perhaps a thousand miles. The shielding would have to be solid, and housing a probe of about one cubic yard.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 28-March-2006, 04:59 PM
Spock Jenkins Spock Jenkins is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,165
Default

"Please note that my calculations used a lot of guesses and approximations, and the required diameter could be anywhere from 2 and a half miles to perhaps a thousand miles. The shielding would have to be solid, and housing a probe of about one cubic yard."

That's just to get the probe in there. Could the probe read anything with the shielding on? If it could - could it even get a message with it's readings out of the atmosphere and back to earth?

I can think of a lot more interesting things to for the money.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 28-March-2006, 05:09 PM
agingjb's Avatar
agingjb agingjb is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Default

If we could build something that could survive in a high pressure, high temperature environment like the Jovian atmosphere, then we would have some very impressive technology. Containing a mere plasma of low density, for instance, should be easy, so we would have cracked the fusion problem. We'd have abundant power; could we invert the containment?
Reply With Quote
Old 28-March-2006, 05:19 PM
Christopher Ferro
This message has been deleted by Christopher Ferro.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 28-March-2006, 06:09 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin MA
Posts: 16,032
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spock Jenkins
I can think of a lot more interesting things to for the money.
Hi Spock Jenkins, welcome to the BAUT forum.

I had hoped it was obvious that this would be an expensive and nearly pointless exercise.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 28-March-2006, 07:08 PM
parallaxicality's Avatar
parallaxicality parallaxicality is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,779
Default

Is it possible to determine whether or not Jupiter has a rocky core? I was imagining using something akin to depth charges to measure speed of the resulting seismic waves.
__________________
There is a growing tendancy to think of Man as a rational, thinking being, which is absurd.- Marvin the Martian.

It's gotten to the point where careful investigation is needed just to tell parody from reality. I think that means reality is broken.- Noclevername.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 03:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today