Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Space Exploration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2003, 04:54 AM
nebularain's Avatar
nebularain nebularain is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Central MD
Posts: 2,049
Default Inside info on Hubble

I just attended the monthly Teachers' Thursday at the MD Science Center (which is also the official HST National Visitor Center , I might add). Tonight's guest speaker was Max Mutchler, Senior Data Analyst at STScI in Baltimore.

I had the chance to ask him about the threat of Hubble not being able to be re-serviced due to the loss of Columbia. He replied the word they were given was to continue planning as if still on schedule. So, maybe there is hope.

Interestingly, there are only two more scheduled re-servicings of Hubble - one in 2006, I believe it was, and the final in 2010. Also in 2010-2011 or there abouts, they plan on launching a successor to Hubble called the James Webb Space Telescope. This telescope will be geared towards IR light so it can study the early universe.

Early in the presentation, he mentioned some upcoming pictures to be released. One is the Ultra Deep Field. I believe he said it will be released this summer. The other is another imaging of the Helix Nebula to be released during Astronomy Day, May 10, 2003. Interestingly, this image was taken during the last Leonids Meteor shower, Nov. 19, 2002. It just so happened that the Helix Nebula was in the direction Hubble was turned toward in order to point away from the meteor shower. Convenient!

During the presentation, he made a reference to how some people are spreading hoax beliefs about UFO's by Photoshop'ing NASA pictures (he showed one of the infamous SOHO doctored images). I used teh opportunity to promote the Bad Astronomy web site to the other educators in the room. (Aren't you all proud of me? )
__________________
"As I lay beneath the Southern Cross, the stars tell more than I could" . . . David Meece
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2003, 03:38 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is online now
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 26,043
Default

The website says 2005, but that's probably tentative considering the shuttle situation.

I think that was originally supposed to be the last servicing mission, but with the delays on the JWST (which was originally supposed to launch in 2007, I believe), there's talk of an additional one.

Personally, it would make sense to me to keep Hubble going as long as the systems can hold out. Even if JWST is in place, it's still a unique instrument.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2003, 07:39 PM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,674
Default

Quote:
Personally, it would make sense to me to keep Hubble going as long as the systems can hold out. Even if JWST is in place, it's still a unique instrument.
I second that! The Hale scope at Mt. Palomar was not mothballed just because The Keck scopes came online. All the major scopes are overbooked, no matter how many "bigger and better" scopes get built. There will always be work for the Hubble. 8)
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-June-2003, 10:01 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is online now
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 26,043
Default

What to do with Hubble
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-June-2003, 10:52 PM
girlgeek girlgeek is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 48
Default

Quote:
The orbiting observatory could be brought down to Earth in 2010 for possible display in the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum.
Now that would be cool! I can only imagine how much longer the lines will be for that museum!

girlgeek
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-June-2003, 10:53 PM
Russ's Avatar
Russ Russ is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Ohio
Posts: 1,583
Default

I agree with ToSeek and KK. Keep it up there until they run out of duct tape and coathanger wire. (they can't fix it any more)
__________________
It's just one of those damn things of which there are many few. -- Dan Blocker
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-June-2003, 10:59 PM
dgruss23's Avatar
dgruss23 dgruss23 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 4,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek
It's a shame to think that such a productive piece of equipment will have to be retired from scientific work!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-June-2003, 03:47 AM
gethen's Avatar
gethen gethen is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: the great white north
Posts: 2,401
Default

Amen. Some of the most astounding images of space ever seen are from the Hubble. After all of the hoopla over the flawed mirror after its launch, it redeemed itself in fine fashion. Hate to see it go.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-June-2003, 03:56 AM
Peter B Peter B is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Oz, Down Under, Land of the Long Weekend
Posts: 1,624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by girlgeek
Quote:
The orbiting observatory could be brought down to Earth in 2010 for possible display in the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum.
Now that would be cool! I can only imagine how much longer the lines will be for that museum!

girlgeek
Just wait for the Twinkies to say it was never in orbit, and all the Hubble photos are faked!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-June-2003, 08:30 AM
beskeptical beskeptical is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,308
Default

So many sites, so little time.... The Sloan Digital Sky survey is making great progress.

Those sound like great Thursdays, Neb.
__________________
~~ ><>><> ~~ ><,,> ><,,> ...`;=;p d;=;' /\/\^/\ ^^ ^/\/\_
Democracy Now! - The lost art of investigative news reporting.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today